Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdrealtor
ParticipantSave yourself the time and check here. I’m sutrprised SD R didnt send you here. if he didnt know about this, he can thank me for teaching him another new trick. This is will show you the rate you should be able to get.
Meet and beat pricing often involves illegal discounting as title rates are filed with the state. More often than not they will “meet and beat” by issuing a cheaper/lower quality policy. You will pay less by getting less. The rate you will find here is for an ALTA HOP policy which is the best policy issued.
http://www.clta.titlewizard.com/default.aspx
You can get cheaper rates if you go with a lesser policy but the standard purchase contract states the policy should be an ALTA HOP.
sdrealtor
ParticipantSave yourself the time and check here. I’m sutrprised SD R didnt send you here. if he didnt know about this, he can thank me for teaching him another new trick. This is will show you the rate you should be able to get.
Meet and beat pricing often involves illegal discounting as title rates are filed with the state. More often than not they will “meet and beat” by issuing a cheaper/lower quality policy. You will pay less by getting less. The rate you will find here is for an ALTA HOP policy which is the best policy issued.
http://www.clta.titlewizard.com/default.aspx
You can get cheaper rates if you go with a lesser policy but the standard purchase contract states the policy should be an ALTA HOP.
sdrealtor
ParticipantSave yourself the time and check here. I’m sutrprised SD R didnt send you here. if he didnt know about this, he can thank me for teaching him another new trick. This is will show you the rate you should be able to get.
Meet and beat pricing often involves illegal discounting as title rates are filed with the state. More often than not they will “meet and beat” by issuing a cheaper/lower quality policy. You will pay less by getting less. The rate you will find here is for an ALTA HOP policy which is the best policy issued.
http://www.clta.titlewizard.com/default.aspx
You can get cheaper rates if you go with a lesser policy but the standard purchase contract states the policy should be an ALTA HOP.
sdrealtor
ParticipantSave yourself the time and check here. I’m sutrprised SD R didnt send you here. if he didnt know about this, he can thank me for teaching him another new trick. This is will show you the rate you should be able to get.
Meet and beat pricing often involves illegal discounting as title rates are filed with the state. More often than not they will “meet and beat” by issuing a cheaper/lower quality policy. You will pay less by getting less. The rate you will find here is for an ALTA HOP policy which is the best policy issued.
http://www.clta.titlewizard.com/default.aspx
You can get cheaper rates if you go with a lesser policy but the standard purchase contract states the policy should be an ALTA HOP.
sdrealtor
ParticipantSave yourself the time and check here. I’m sutrprised SD R didnt send you here. if he didnt know about this, he can thank me for teaching him another new trick. This is will show you the rate you should be able to get.
Meet and beat pricing often involves illegal discounting as title rates are filed with the state. More often than not they will “meet and beat” by issuing a cheaper/lower quality policy. You will pay less by getting less. The rate you will find here is for an ALTA HOP policy which is the best policy issued.
http://www.clta.titlewizard.com/default.aspx
You can get cheaper rates if you go with a lesser policy but the standard purchase contract states the policy should be an ALTA HOP.
sdrealtor
ParticipantVirtually every listing under 350K that you posted that is currently listed with a prior 2004 to 2006 sale will result in a 30%+ decline by the time it closes. A couple look like they could go over a 40% decline. Thats good enough for me to call it a 30 to 40% decline over there for the 350K and under market.
sdrealtor
ParticipantVirtually every listing under 350K that you posted that is currently listed with a prior 2004 to 2006 sale will result in a 30%+ decline by the time it closes. A couple look like they could go over a 40% decline. Thats good enough for me to call it a 30 to 40% decline over there for the 350K and under market.
sdrealtor
ParticipantVirtually every listing under 350K that you posted that is currently listed with a prior 2004 to 2006 sale will result in a 30%+ decline by the time it closes. A couple look like they could go over a 40% decline. Thats good enough for me to call it a 30 to 40% decline over there for the 350K and under market.
sdrealtor
ParticipantVirtually every listing under 350K that you posted that is currently listed with a prior 2004 to 2006 sale will result in a 30%+ decline by the time it closes. A couple look like they could go over a 40% decline. Thats good enough for me to call it a 30 to 40% decline over there for the 350K and under market.
sdrealtor
ParticipantVirtually every listing under 350K that you posted that is currently listed with a prior 2004 to 2006 sale will result in a 30%+ decline by the time it closes. A couple look like they could go over a 40% decline. Thats good enough for me to call it a 30 to 40% decline over there for the 350K and under market.
sdrealtor
ParticipantThanx AN, missed your post b4 putting mine in.
sdrealtor
ParticipantThanx AN, missed your post b4 putting mine in.
sdrealtor
ParticipantThanx AN, missed your post b4 putting mine in.
sdrealtor
ParticipantThanx AN, missed your post b4 putting mine in.
-
AuthorPosts
