[sdrealtor]

A couple years ago $2M got you a teardown in La Jolla. Now $2M gets you a very nice ocean view home or one a block or two forom the beach. My times have changed.

[sdrealtor]

$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.

In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.

This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.

Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.

Make sure you get all the important facts.

I hope this makes sense to y’all.

[sdrealtor]

$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.

In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.

This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.

Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.

Make sure you get all the important facts.

I hope this makes sense to y’all.

[sdrealtor]

$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.

In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.

This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.

Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.

Make sure you get all the important facts.

I hope this makes sense to y’all.

[sdrealtor]

$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.

In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.

This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.

Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.

Make sure you get all the important facts.

I hope this makes sense to y’all.

[sdrealtor]

$/sq ft cant be looked at alone. You also need to look at the average sq ft. Larger homes sell for less per sq ft and smaller homes sell for more.

In the current environment with low end (i.e smaller homes) dominating the market the $/sq ft will be higher than it really is understating the decline. When we were booming, the newer/larger homes (i.e. mcMansions) dominated the market understating the increases.

Here’s a hypothetical example:

Last year average $/sq ft in an area is $300 and the average size is 2000 sq ft.

This year average $/sq ft in same area is $300 but the average size is now 1500 sq ft.

Looking at $/sq ft would show no decline while there was a significant decline because you are seeing $300/sq ft for a much smaller home.

Make sure you get all the important facts.

I hope this makes sense to y’all.

[sdrealtor]

There will be some very good deal in a couple months (i.e. Nov/Dec). Some will be very compelling with carrying costs well below market rents. Get good counsel and make your own decision.

[sdrealtor]

There will be some very good deal in a couple months (i.e. Nov/Dec). Some will be very compelling with carrying costs well below market rents. Get good counsel and make your own decision.

[sdrealtor]

There will be some very good deal in a couple months (i.e. Nov/Dec). Some will be very compelling with carrying costs well below market rents. Get good counsel and make your own decision.

[sdrealtor]

There will be some very good deal in a couple months (i.e. Nov/Dec). Some will be very compelling with carrying costs well below market rents. Get good counsel and make your own decision.

[sdrealtor]

There will be some very good deal in a couple months (i.e. Nov/Dec). Some will be very compelling with carrying costs well below market rents. Get good counsel and make your own decision.

[sdrealtor]

village park in encinitas used to be the town dump.

[sdrealtor]

village park in encinitas used to be the town dump.

[sdrealtor]

village park in encinitas used to be the town dump.

[sdrealtor]

village park in encinitas used to be the town dump.

[Author]

Posts