Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM in reply to: What is keeping real estate prices so high in San Diego? #211739May 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM in reply to: What is keeping real estate prices so high in San Diego? #211810
sdnativeson
ParticipantIt’s all the extremely high paying mid six figure and beyond incomes that the service industry workers pull down.
That “median income” stuff is all crap.May 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM in reply to: What is keeping real estate prices so high in San Diego? #211838ParticipantIt’s all the extremely high paying mid six figure and beyond incomes that the service industry workers pull down.
That “median income” stuff is all crap.May 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM in reply to: What is keeping real estate prices so high in San Diego? #211861ParticipantIt’s all the extremely high paying mid six figure and beyond incomes that the service industry workers pull down.
That “median income” stuff is all crap.May 26, 2008 at 9:27 PM in reply to: What is keeping real estate prices so high in San Diego? #211892ParticipantIt’s all the extremely high paying mid six figure and beyond incomes that the service industry workers pull down.
That “median income” stuff is all crap.ParticipantWell said.
ParticipantWell said.
ParticipantWell said.
ParticipantWell said.
ParticipantWell said.
ParticipantIn the mid 3’s? LOL. so much for “fundamentals”. It’s not worth that now and won’t be in another year IMHO.
Some neighborhoods in Clairemont (some above the 52 and farther west are nice and can warrant a higher digit but the mount streets? Not much more than a decade ago houses were well under 200 in most of those Mount neighborhoods. I know, I know, its not the same, times have changed etc. but most of Clairemont hasn’t changed, for the better.
In the fours and fives it’s way beyond the middle, lower middle class area it started out as. The lot sizes on a majority of those homes are far smaller than this place (not much room to grow beyond up).
That all aside I guess someone could get off an having the
most expensive house in this neighborhood.ParticipantIn the mid 3’s? LOL. so much for “fundamentals”. It’s not worth that now and won’t be in another year IMHO.
Some neighborhoods in Clairemont (some above the 52 and farther west are nice and can warrant a higher digit but the mount streets? Not much more than a decade ago houses were well under 200 in most of those Mount neighborhoods. I know, I know, its not the same, times have changed etc. but most of Clairemont hasn’t changed, for the better.
In the fours and fives it’s way beyond the middle, lower middle class area it started out as. The lot sizes on a majority of those homes are far smaller than this place (not much room to grow beyond up).
That all aside I guess someone could get off an having the
most expensive house in this neighborhood.ParticipantIn the mid 3’s? LOL. so much for “fundamentals”. It’s not worth that now and won’t be in another year IMHO.
Some neighborhoods in Clairemont (some above the 52 and farther west are nice and can warrant a higher digit but the mount streets? Not much more than a decade ago houses were well under 200 in most of those Mount neighborhoods. I know, I know, its not the same, times have changed etc. but most of Clairemont hasn’t changed, for the better.
In the fours and fives it’s way beyond the middle, lower middle class area it started out as. The lot sizes on a majority of those homes are far smaller than this place (not much room to grow beyond up).
That all aside I guess someone could get off an having the
most expensive house in this neighborhood.ParticipantIn the mid 3’s? LOL. so much for “fundamentals”. It’s not worth that now and won’t be in another year IMHO.
Some neighborhoods in Clairemont (some above the 52 and farther west are nice and can warrant a higher digit but the mount streets? Not much more than a decade ago houses were well under 200 in most of those Mount neighborhoods. I know, I know, its not the same, times have changed etc. but most of Clairemont hasn’t changed, for the better.
In the fours and fives it’s way beyond the middle, lower middle class area it started out as. The lot sizes on a majority of those homes are far smaller than this place (not much room to grow beyond up).
That all aside I guess someone could get off an having the
most expensive house in this neighborhood.ParticipantIn the mid 3’s? LOL. so much for “fundamentals”. It’s not worth that now and won’t be in another year IMHO.
Some neighborhoods in Clairemont (some above the 52 and farther west are nice and can warrant a higher digit but the mount streets? Not much more than a decade ago houses were well under 200 in most of those Mount neighborhoods. I know, I know, its not the same, times have changed etc. but most of Clairemont hasn’t changed, for the better.
In the fours and fives it’s way beyond the middle, lower middle class area it started out as. The lot sizes on a majority of those homes are far smaller than this place (not much room to grow beyond up).
That all aside I guess someone could get off an having the
most expensive house in this neighborhood. -
AuthorPosts
