Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdduuuude
Participant[quote=equalizerWhat do you want Ben to do? Nothing?
Do you want half the annuities to diappear? [/quote]
Yes.
No, but they likely already have. If they have, saying the haven’t isn’t really going to bring them back.
sdduuuude
Participant[quote=equalizerWhat do you want Ben to do? Nothing?
Do you want half the annuities to diappear? [/quote]
Yes.
No, but they likely already have. If they have, saying the haven’t isn’t really going to bring them back.
sdduuuude
Participant[quote=equalizerWhat do you want Ben to do? Nothing?
Do you want half the annuities to diappear? [/quote]
Yes.
No, but they likely already have. If they have, saying the haven’t isn’t really going to bring them back.
March 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM in reply to: Elite Actor Spends Public Money on his Bloated Mansion #364187sdduuuude
Participant[quote=afx114]… the point of rebates and incentives on things like this (whether you’re rich or poor or live in a big house or small) is to get the ball rolling in a new industry.[/quote]
With oil at $200/barrel there are sufficient incentives built into the economics of the situaion.
With oil at $40, it is pushing on a rope, not getting the ball rolling.
March 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM in reply to: Elite Actor Spends Public Money on his Bloated Mansion #364475sdduuuude
Participant[quote=afx114]… the point of rebates and incentives on things like this (whether you’re rich or poor or live in a big house or small) is to get the ball rolling in a new industry.[/quote]
With oil at $200/barrel there are sufficient incentives built into the economics of the situaion.
With oil at $40, it is pushing on a rope, not getting the ball rolling.
March 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM in reply to: Elite Actor Spends Public Money on his Bloated Mansion #364634sdduuuude
Participant[quote=afx114]… the point of rebates and incentives on things like this (whether you’re rich or poor or live in a big house or small) is to get the ball rolling in a new industry.[/quote]
With oil at $200/barrel there are sufficient incentives built into the economics of the situaion.
With oil at $40, it is pushing on a rope, not getting the ball rolling.
March 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM in reply to: Elite Actor Spends Public Money on his Bloated Mansion #364668sdduuuude
Participant[quote=afx114]… the point of rebates and incentives on things like this (whether you’re rich or poor or live in a big house or small) is to get the ball rolling in a new industry.[/quote]
With oil at $200/barrel there are sufficient incentives built into the economics of the situaion.
With oil at $40, it is pushing on a rope, not getting the ball rolling.
March 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM in reply to: Elite Actor Spends Public Money on his Bloated Mansion #364782sdduuuude
Participant[quote=afx114]… the point of rebates and incentives on things like this (whether you’re rich or poor or live in a big house or small) is to get the ball rolling in a new industry.[/quote]
With oil at $200/barrel there are sufficient incentives built into the economics of the situaion.
With oil at $40, it is pushing on a rope, not getting the ball rolling.
sdduuuude
ParticipantI have no response to this.
I feel like Microsoft Excel that has just encountered a circular reference.sdduuuude
ParticipantI have no response to this.
I feel like Microsoft Excel that has just encountered a circular reference.sdduuuude
ParticipantI have no response to this.
I feel like Microsoft Excel that has just encountered a circular reference.sdduuuude
ParticipantI have no response to this.
I feel like Microsoft Excel that has just encountered a circular reference.sdduuuude
ParticipantI have no response to this.
I feel like Microsoft Excel that has just encountered a circular reference.sdduuuude
Participant[quote=SDEngineer]BTW, the other problem with a currency tied to a particular commodity – especially a scarce commodity little tied to GDP as a whole – is that by it’s nature, any fixed relationship to that commodity will result in deflationary pressure[/quote]
I’m with you there.
[quote=SDEngineer]which harms investment[/quote]
Not with you there. It would change the investment environment, not necessarily for the worse. The economy would become less “borrow and spend” oriented and more savings oriented. How awful.
-
AuthorPosts
