Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2010 at 12:42 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #519190February 26, 2010 at 12:34 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518259
sdcellar
ParticipantCA renter– you sound a lot like us. We really do have pretty reasonable criteria for how much money we’re willing to spend and we’ve also got a pretty broad search area.
We, too, are somewhat stuck on NCC, at least based on work proximity, some of our extracurricular activities and this one damn school we want to get our kids into, but we look elsewhere and that is probably one of the few compromises we’re willing to make.
February 26, 2010 at 12:34 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518400sdcellar
ParticipantCA renter– you sound a lot like us. We really do have pretty reasonable criteria for how much money we’re willing to spend and we’ve also got a pretty broad search area.
We, too, are somewhat stuck on NCC, at least based on work proximity, some of our extracurricular activities and this one damn school we want to get our kids into, but we look elsewhere and that is probably one of the few compromises we’re willing to make.
February 26, 2010 at 12:34 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518833sdcellar
ParticipantCA renter– you sound a lot like us. We really do have pretty reasonable criteria for how much money we’re willing to spend and we’ve also got a pretty broad search area.
We, too, are somewhat stuck on NCC, at least based on work proximity, some of our extracurricular activities and this one damn school we want to get our kids into, but we look elsewhere and that is probably one of the few compromises we’re willing to make.
February 26, 2010 at 12:34 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518927sdcellar
ParticipantCA renter– you sound a lot like us. We really do have pretty reasonable criteria for how much money we’re willing to spend and we’ve also got a pretty broad search area.
We, too, are somewhat stuck on NCC, at least based on work proximity, some of our extracurricular activities and this one damn school we want to get our kids into, but we look elsewhere and that is probably one of the few compromises we’re willing to make.
February 26, 2010 at 12:34 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #519180sdcellar
ParticipantCA renter– you sound a lot like us. We really do have pretty reasonable criteria for how much money we’re willing to spend and we’ve also got a pretty broad search area.
We, too, are somewhat stuck on NCC, at least based on work proximity, some of our extracurricular activities and this one damn school we want to get our kids into, but we look elsewhere and that is probably one of the few compromises we’re willing to make.
February 26, 2010 at 12:21 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518239sdcellar
ParticipantI think we need to be careful with what we consider inflation since 2001. Also, I’d look to Poway first, better schools and in the eights you can probably get something pretty decent.
February 26, 2010 at 12:21 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518380sdcellar
ParticipantI think we need to be careful with what we consider inflation since 2001. Also, I’d look to Poway first, better schools and in the eights you can probably get something pretty decent.
February 26, 2010 at 12:21 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518813sdcellar
ParticipantI think we need to be careful with what we consider inflation since 2001. Also, I’d look to Poway first, better schools and in the eights you can probably get something pretty decent.
February 26, 2010 at 12:21 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518907sdcellar
ParticipantI think we need to be careful with what we consider inflation since 2001. Also, I’d look to Poway first, better schools and in the eights you can probably get something pretty decent.
February 26, 2010 at 12:21 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #519160sdcellar
ParticipantI think we need to be careful with what we consider inflation since 2001. Also, I’d look to Poway first, better schools and in the eights you can probably get something pretty decent.
February 26, 2010 at 12:16 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518224sdcellar
Participant[quote=AN][quote=sdcellar][quote=AN]I guess that’s the downside of looking at only resale and have a very specific sets of criteria, it takes a long time to find one that you like at the price you like. Good luck to you CAR. Now I understand why you’re frustrated.[/quote]I’m not sensing that CA renter’s criteria is anything terribly picky. Nice houses (or even houses with good potential) are hard to find and still just too plain expensive.[/quote]
Single story on large non slope/non corner lot, 4+ bedrooms, (I assume) 2000+ sq-ft, in NCC, (I assume) under $700k. That seems pretty limited to me. There can’t possible be that many houses that fit those criteria.[/quote]If you excluded price, there’s nothing at all particularly unique about those criteria. So yes, price is the problem, but that doesn’t mean the prices are right, adjust that element of your criteria.February 26, 2010 at 12:16 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518365sdcellar
Participant[quote=AN][quote=sdcellar][quote=AN]I guess that’s the downside of looking at only resale and have a very specific sets of criteria, it takes a long time to find one that you like at the price you like. Good luck to you CAR. Now I understand why you’re frustrated.[/quote]I’m not sensing that CA renter’s criteria is anything terribly picky. Nice houses (or even houses with good potential) are hard to find and still just too plain expensive.[/quote]
Single story on large non slope/non corner lot, 4+ bedrooms, (I assume) 2000+ sq-ft, in NCC, (I assume) under $700k. That seems pretty limited to me. There can’t possible be that many houses that fit those criteria.[/quote]If you excluded price, there’s nothing at all particularly unique about those criteria. So yes, price is the problem, but that doesn’t mean the prices are right, adjust that element of your criteria.February 26, 2010 at 12:16 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518798sdcellar
Participant[quote=AN][quote=sdcellar][quote=AN]I guess that’s the downside of looking at only resale and have a very specific sets of criteria, it takes a long time to find one that you like at the price you like. Good luck to you CAR. Now I understand why you’re frustrated.[/quote]I’m not sensing that CA renter’s criteria is anything terribly picky. Nice houses (or even houses with good potential) are hard to find and still just too plain expensive.[/quote]
Single story on large non slope/non corner lot, 4+ bedrooms, (I assume) 2000+ sq-ft, in NCC, (I assume) under $700k. That seems pretty limited to me. There can’t possible be that many houses that fit those criteria.[/quote]If you excluded price, there’s nothing at all particularly unique about those criteria. So yes, price is the problem, but that doesn’t mean the prices are right, adjust that element of your criteria.February 26, 2010 at 12:16 AM in reply to: About half of U.S. mortgages seen underwater by 2011 #518892sdcellar
Participant[quote=AN][quote=sdcellar][quote=AN]I guess that’s the downside of looking at only resale and have a very specific sets of criteria, it takes a long time to find one that you like at the price you like. Good luck to you CAR. Now I understand why you’re frustrated.[/quote]I’m not sensing that CA renter’s criteria is anything terribly picky. Nice houses (or even houses with good potential) are hard to find and still just too plain expensive.[/quote]
Single story on large non slope/non corner lot, 4+ bedrooms, (I assume) 2000+ sq-ft, in NCC, (I assume) under $700k. That seems pretty limited to me. There can’t possible be that many houses that fit those criteria.[/quote]If you excluded price, there’s nothing at all particularly unique about those criteria. So yes, price is the problem, but that doesn’t mean the prices are right, adjust that element of your criteria. -
AuthorPosts
