[SD Transplant]

Yes, the closure of a CC impacts credit score because it will reflect a smaller credit amount available vs. credit used (if any).

[SD Transplant]

Yes, the closure of a CC impacts credit score because it will reflect a smaller credit amount available vs. credit used (if any).

[SD Transplant]

Yes, the closure of a CC impacts credit score because it will reflect a smaller credit amount available vs. credit used (if any).

[SD Transplant]

Yes, the closure of a CC impacts credit score because it will reflect a smaller credit amount available vs. credit used (if any).

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

Dan,

I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..

Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?

[SD Transplant]

I think he’s missing the biggest positive about renting today, which is: FLEXIBILITY / MOBILITY which ought to have a huge premium in today’s economic market. One could move & get a job anywhere in this country w/out trying to sell an underwater shack.

[SD Transplant]

I think he’s missing the biggest positive about renting today, which is: FLEXIBILITY / MOBILITY which ought to have a huge premium in today’s economic market. One could move & get a job anywhere in this country w/out trying to sell an underwater shack.

[SD Transplant]

I think he’s missing the biggest positive about renting today, which is: FLEXIBILITY / MOBILITY which ought to have a huge premium in today’s economic market. One could move & get a job anywhere in this country w/out trying to sell an underwater shack.

[SD Transplant]

I think he’s missing the biggest positive about renting today, which is: FLEXIBILITY / MOBILITY which ought to have a huge premium in today’s economic market. One could move & get a job anywhere in this country w/out trying to sell an underwater shack.

[SD Transplant]

I think he’s missing the biggest positive about renting today, which is: FLEXIBILITY / MOBILITY which ought to have a huge premium in today’s economic market. One could move & get a job anywhere in this country w/out trying to sell an underwater shack.

[SD Transplant]

IBM confirmed more or less about 4,600 layoffs….here are some details:

“Technology giant IBM is resorting to “scattered layoffs” and the total could be nearly 4,600 employees in North America even though the company has reported surprisingly strong quarterly profits in January, a media report says.
“Big companies also routinely carry out scattered layoffs that are small enough to stay under the radar… And IBM is one such company,” the New York Times said.
Interestingly, after reporting strong quarterly profits in January, its Chief Executive Samuel J Palmisano in an e-mail message to employees said that while other companies were reducing jobs, his company would not. “Most importantly, we will invest in our people,” he wrote.
But the next day, the New York Times said, “More than 1,400 employees in IBM’s sales and distribution division in the United States and Canada were told their jobs would be eliminated in a month. More cuts followed, and overall, IBM has told about 4,600 North American employees in recent weeks that their jobs are vanishing.”
Quoting J Randall MacDonald, IBM’s senior vice-president for human resources, the newspaper said, “It was routine for the company to lay off some employees while hiring elsewhere.”

[Author]

Posts