Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantOwning a home is not a basic need and to classify it in the same breathe as air, water, food, even freedom is a joke.
Once more to place arbitrary restrictions on markets such as home ownership does not solve basic problems due to differentials in wealth.
You can apply your same line of reasoning to cars, to jobs, to food, to water, to anything. Carrying your logic to a not so unreasonable conclusion would imply everyone should have access to everything no matter what they have accomplished in life.
ParticipantOwning a home is not a basic need and to classify it in the same breathe as air, water, food, even freedom is a joke.
Once more to place arbitrary restrictions on markets such as home ownership does not solve basic problems due to differentials in wealth.
You can apply your same line of reasoning to cars, to jobs, to food, to water, to anything. Carrying your logic to a not so unreasonable conclusion would imply everyone should have access to everything no matter what they have accomplished in life.
ParticipantOwning a home is not a basic need and to classify it in the same breathe as air, water, food, even freedom is a joke.
Once more to place arbitrary restrictions on markets such as home ownership does not solve basic problems due to differentials in wealth.
You can apply your same line of reasoning to cars, to jobs, to food, to water, to anything. Carrying your logic to a not so unreasonable conclusion would imply everyone should have access to everything no matter what they have accomplished in life.
ParticipantWhy just restrict foreigners? Why not restrict rich people who are citizens? Why not restrict REITs and corporations?
What is the difference? Why not just take your taxpayer money and give it to those who have less money so that they can afford the homes? Just because you can afford a 600k home and someone else cannot does that mean you should not be able to buy it in hopes that the pricing will come down enough so someone else can?
I feel that arguments for such a society begin to place somewhat arbitrary levels of haves verses have nots and how that should benefit. Needless to say there can be a further argument that at some point making just enough effort to be a have not rather then working as hard as you can to be a have becomes a possibility.
I can understand the limitations on foreigners for holdings of US properties. I am no expert on tax law but I do believe there are tax ramifications for those who do.
Anyways more people around the world have caught up and surpassed us financially.
Get used to it.
ParticipantWhy just restrict foreigners? Why not restrict rich people who are citizens? Why not restrict REITs and corporations?
What is the difference? Why not just take your taxpayer money and give it to those who have less money so that they can afford the homes? Just because you can afford a 600k home and someone else cannot does that mean you should not be able to buy it in hopes that the pricing will come down enough so someone else can?
I feel that arguments for such a society begin to place somewhat arbitrary levels of haves verses have nots and how that should benefit. Needless to say there can be a further argument that at some point making just enough effort to be a have not rather then working as hard as you can to be a have becomes a possibility.
I can understand the limitations on foreigners for holdings of US properties. I am no expert on tax law but I do believe there are tax ramifications for those who do.
Anyways more people around the world have caught up and surpassed us financially.
Get used to it.
ParticipantWhy just restrict foreigners? Why not restrict rich people who are citizens? Why not restrict REITs and corporations?
What is the difference? Why not just take your taxpayer money and give it to those who have less money so that they can afford the homes? Just because you can afford a 600k home and someone else cannot does that mean you should not be able to buy it in hopes that the pricing will come down enough so someone else can?
I feel that arguments for such a society begin to place somewhat arbitrary levels of haves verses have nots and how that should benefit. Needless to say there can be a further argument that at some point making just enough effort to be a have not rather then working as hard as you can to be a have becomes a possibility.
I can understand the limitations on foreigners for holdings of US properties. I am no expert on tax law but I do believe there are tax ramifications for those who do.
Anyways more people around the world have caught up and surpassed us financially.
Get used to it.
ParticipantWhy just restrict foreigners? Why not restrict rich people who are citizens? Why not restrict REITs and corporations?
What is the difference? Why not just take your taxpayer money and give it to those who have less money so that they can afford the homes? Just because you can afford a 600k home and someone else cannot does that mean you should not be able to buy it in hopes that the pricing will come down enough so someone else can?
I feel that arguments for such a society begin to place somewhat arbitrary levels of haves verses have nots and how that should benefit. Needless to say there can be a further argument that at some point making just enough effort to be a have not rather then working as hard as you can to be a have becomes a possibility.
I can understand the limitations on foreigners for holdings of US properties. I am no expert on tax law but I do believe there are tax ramifications for those who do.
Anyways more people around the world have caught up and surpassed us financially.
Get used to it.
ParticipantWhy just restrict foreigners? Why not restrict rich people who are citizens? Why not restrict REITs and corporations?
What is the difference? Why not just take your taxpayer money and give it to those who have less money so that they can afford the homes? Just because you can afford a 600k home and someone else cannot does that mean you should not be able to buy it in hopes that the pricing will come down enough so someone else can?
I feel that arguments for such a society begin to place somewhat arbitrary levels of haves verses have nots and how that should benefit. Needless to say there can be a further argument that at some point making just enough effort to be a have not rather then working as hard as you can to be a have becomes a possibility.
I can understand the limitations on foreigners for holdings of US properties. I am no expert on tax law but I do believe there are tax ramifications for those who do.
Anyways more people around the world have caught up and surpassed us financially.
Get used to it.
ParticipantThat is kind of a bizarre statement. The homeowner is paying the rate specified on the note. Nothing more and nothing less regardless of how many times the note changes hands.
ParticipantThat is kind of a bizarre statement. The homeowner is paying the rate specified on the note. Nothing more and nothing less regardless of how many times the note changes hands.
ParticipantThat is kind of a bizarre statement. The homeowner is paying the rate specified on the note. Nothing more and nothing less regardless of how many times the note changes hands.
ParticipantThat is kind of a bizarre statement. The homeowner is paying the rate specified on the note. Nothing more and nothing less regardless of how many times the note changes hands.
ParticipantThat is kind of a bizarre statement. The homeowner is paying the rate specified on the note. Nothing more and nothing less regardless of how many times the note changes hands.
ParticipantCome on CAR you cannot be serious. You start sliding down a slippery slope when you start making restrictions like that.
Mojo I guess it depends on the market conditions…
-
AuthorPosts
