Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405643May 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405883
SD Realtor
ParticipantPatientrenter you hit that one out of the park. More defecit spending and more taxes.
May 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405944ParticipantPatientrenter you hit that one out of the park. More defecit spending and more taxes.
May 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #406091ParticipantPatientrenter you hit that one out of the park. More defecit spending and more taxes.
ParticipantSunny without getting into much detail, I would not recommend Regents as an investment purchase. It does not pencil out anywhere close to what some of the other stock in UTC pencils out with regarding a rental property. The increase in rent that you would get does not come close to covering the expense of the complex.
ParticipantSunny without getting into much detail, I would not recommend Regents as an investment purchase. It does not pencil out anywhere close to what some of the other stock in UTC pencils out with regarding a rental property. The increase in rent that you would get does not come close to covering the expense of the complex.
ParticipantSunny without getting into much detail, I would not recommend Regents as an investment purchase. It does not pencil out anywhere close to what some of the other stock in UTC pencils out with regarding a rental property. The increase in rent that you would get does not come close to covering the expense of the complex.
ParticipantSunny without getting into much detail, I would not recommend Regents as an investment purchase. It does not pencil out anywhere close to what some of the other stock in UTC pencils out with regarding a rental property. The increase in rent that you would get does not come close to covering the expense of the complex.
ParticipantSunny without getting into much detail, I would not recommend Regents as an investment purchase. It does not pencil out anywhere close to what some of the other stock in UTC pencils out with regarding a rental property. The increase in rent that you would get does not come close to covering the expense of the complex.
May 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405158ParticipantRicechex how do you propose to fund services that we don’t have, and never had the money to pay for?
None of this is new. Every year the budgets have been a sham. Don’t you get it? Even if they somehow by a miracle met the budget, what about next year.
It is simple. The state cannot fund what the state cannot pay for.
How do you think other states do this? Do you think every state in the union has this same problem?
This is not some crime against humanity. This is not some intractable problem. This is the result of years and years of irresponsible spending. Years of incompetent leadership. Years of making social contracts with NOT ANY CLUE as to how they will be paid for. WE WERE PROMISED A BALANCED BUDGET JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?
Jeez our state applies the SECOND HIGHEST TAXES in the country to state residents and look how f’d up we are.
You have to look no further then our state legislature.
The reality is that only after we cut all the services do we really know what we can actually spend at the state level. Until it is actually done, until we wean ourselves from defiecit spending, this state will never function efficiently. In the long run, it hurts everyone alot worse.
May 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405405ParticipantRicechex how do you propose to fund services that we don’t have, and never had the money to pay for?
None of this is new. Every year the budgets have been a sham. Don’t you get it? Even if they somehow by a miracle met the budget, what about next year.
It is simple. The state cannot fund what the state cannot pay for.
How do you think other states do this? Do you think every state in the union has this same problem?
This is not some crime against humanity. This is not some intractable problem. This is the result of years and years of irresponsible spending. Years of incompetent leadership. Years of making social contracts with NOT ANY CLUE as to how they will be paid for. WE WERE PROMISED A BALANCED BUDGET JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?
Jeez our state applies the SECOND HIGHEST TAXES in the country to state residents and look how f’d up we are.
You have to look no further then our state legislature.
The reality is that only after we cut all the services do we really know what we can actually spend at the state level. Until it is actually done, until we wean ourselves from defiecit spending, this state will never function efficiently. In the long run, it hurts everyone alot worse.
May 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405644ParticipantRicechex how do you propose to fund services that we don’t have, and never had the money to pay for?
None of this is new. Every year the budgets have been a sham. Don’t you get it? Even if they somehow by a miracle met the budget, what about next year.
It is simple. The state cannot fund what the state cannot pay for.
How do you think other states do this? Do you think every state in the union has this same problem?
This is not some crime against humanity. This is not some intractable problem. This is the result of years and years of irresponsible spending. Years of incompetent leadership. Years of making social contracts with NOT ANY CLUE as to how they will be paid for. WE WERE PROMISED A BALANCED BUDGET JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?
Jeez our state applies the SECOND HIGHEST TAXES in the country to state residents and look how f’d up we are.
You have to look no further then our state legislature.
The reality is that only after we cut all the services do we really know what we can actually spend at the state level. Until it is actually done, until we wean ourselves from defiecit spending, this state will never function efficiently. In the long run, it hurts everyone alot worse.
May 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405708ParticipantRicechex how do you propose to fund services that we don’t have, and never had the money to pay for?
None of this is new. Every year the budgets have been a sham. Don’t you get it? Even if they somehow by a miracle met the budget, what about next year.
It is simple. The state cannot fund what the state cannot pay for.
How do you think other states do this? Do you think every state in the union has this same problem?
This is not some crime against humanity. This is not some intractable problem. This is the result of years and years of irresponsible spending. Years of incompetent leadership. Years of making social contracts with NOT ANY CLUE as to how they will be paid for. WE WERE PROMISED A BALANCED BUDGET JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?
Jeez our state applies the SECOND HIGHEST TAXES in the country to state residents and look how f’d up we are.
You have to look no further then our state legislature.
The reality is that only after we cut all the services do we really know what we can actually spend at the state level. Until it is actually done, until we wean ourselves from defiecit spending, this state will never function efficiently. In the long run, it hurts everyone alot worse.
May 24, 2009 at 9:55 PM in reply to: OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs #405854ParticipantRicechex how do you propose to fund services that we don’t have, and never had the money to pay for?
None of this is new. Every year the budgets have been a sham. Don’t you get it? Even if they somehow by a miracle met the budget, what about next year.
It is simple. The state cannot fund what the state cannot pay for.
How do you think other states do this? Do you think every state in the union has this same problem?
This is not some crime against humanity. This is not some intractable problem. This is the result of years and years of irresponsible spending. Years of incompetent leadership. Years of making social contracts with NOT ANY CLUE as to how they will be paid for. WE WERE PROMISED A BALANCED BUDGET JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?
Jeez our state applies the SECOND HIGHEST TAXES in the country to state residents and look how f’d up we are.
You have to look no further then our state legislature.
The reality is that only after we cut all the services do we really know what we can actually spend at the state level. Until it is actually done, until we wean ourselves from defiecit spending, this state will never function efficiently. In the long run, it hurts everyone alot worse.
ParticipantYes it is common. Many times an asset disposition company is hired to dispose of the property. They assign the ;roperty to a brokerage. Before the brokerage gets a price from the dispostion company the property needs to be prepped for sale. Changing the locks, trash out, perhaps even cash for keys or evictions, etc… Many times the property is ready to sell before the price is given to the brokerage. In that timeframe (or even before so) there is nothing stopping the broker from marketting the home, even taking offers on it. Many times the sign goes up immediately after the broker has received the assignment from the disposition company. However the home cannot go on the MLS because there is no price yet.
Many disposition companies will ask the broker to keep the home on the MLS at least a few days. Some do not. Also yes there are brokers who cheat the system to double end the deal.
-
AuthorPosts
