Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM in reply to: Will an offer contingent on the sale of the buyer’s home be accepted? #442769August 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM in reply to: Will an offer contingent on the sale of the buyer’s home be accepted? #443106
SD Realtor
ParticipantI do believe you will find some sellers willing to accept a contingent offer. However your offer would be much stronger without the sale contingency. Still though, your agent should be able to help you find homes that have been on the market for a few months and those owners will be more receptive to a contingent offer.
August 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM in reply to: Will an offer contingent on the sale of the buyer’s home be accepted? #443176ParticipantI do believe you will find some sellers willing to accept a contingent offer. However your offer would be much stronger without the sale contingency. Still though, your agent should be able to help you find homes that have been on the market for a few months and those owners will be more receptive to a contingent offer.
August 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM in reply to: Will an offer contingent on the sale of the buyer’s home be accepted? #443352ParticipantI do believe you will find some sellers willing to accept a contingent offer. However your offer would be much stronger without the sale contingency. Still though, your agent should be able to help you find homes that have been on the market for a few months and those owners will be more receptive to a contingent offer.
ParticipantIt was not a perfectly good idea, it was perfectly stupid. It has nothing to do with incentivizing people to help the environment. Are you kidding me? It was an ill conceived idiotic idea. First off it is a subsidy for an already ailing auto industry that already had been pumped full of govt money. It also was a pathetic attempt to help people spend more money when people should be saving money rather then incur more debt. Finally it has done nothing but provide a strong bump in sales and clog the already overclogged landfills with many cars that were nowhere near ready to be destroyed.
I am amazed that this could be considered a great idea by anybody.
You really think this is a wise use of your tax dollars?
ParticipantIt was not a perfectly good idea, it was perfectly stupid. It has nothing to do with incentivizing people to help the environment. Are you kidding me? It was an ill conceived idiotic idea. First off it is a subsidy for an already ailing auto industry that already had been pumped full of govt money. It also was a pathetic attempt to help people spend more money when people should be saving money rather then incur more debt. Finally it has done nothing but provide a strong bump in sales and clog the already overclogged landfills with many cars that were nowhere near ready to be destroyed.
I am amazed that this could be considered a great idea by anybody.
You really think this is a wise use of your tax dollars?
ParticipantIt was not a perfectly good idea, it was perfectly stupid. It has nothing to do with incentivizing people to help the environment. Are you kidding me? It was an ill conceived idiotic idea. First off it is a subsidy for an already ailing auto industry that already had been pumped full of govt money. It also was a pathetic attempt to help people spend more money when people should be saving money rather then incur more debt. Finally it has done nothing but provide a strong bump in sales and clog the already overclogged landfills with many cars that were nowhere near ready to be destroyed.
I am amazed that this could be considered a great idea by anybody.
You really think this is a wise use of your tax dollars?
ParticipantIt was not a perfectly good idea, it was perfectly stupid. It has nothing to do with incentivizing people to help the environment. Are you kidding me? It was an ill conceived idiotic idea. First off it is a subsidy for an already ailing auto industry that already had been pumped full of govt money. It also was a pathetic attempt to help people spend more money when people should be saving money rather then incur more debt. Finally it has done nothing but provide a strong bump in sales and clog the already overclogged landfills with many cars that were nowhere near ready to be destroyed.
I am amazed that this could be considered a great idea by anybody.
You really think this is a wise use of your tax dollars?
ParticipantIt was not a perfectly good idea, it was perfectly stupid. It has nothing to do with incentivizing people to help the environment. Are you kidding me? It was an ill conceived idiotic idea. First off it is a subsidy for an already ailing auto industry that already had been pumped full of govt money. It also was a pathetic attempt to help people spend more money when people should be saving money rather then incur more debt. Finally it has done nothing but provide a strong bump in sales and clog the already overclogged landfills with many cars that were nowhere near ready to be destroyed.
I am amazed that this could be considered a great idea by anybody.
You really think this is a wise use of your tax dollars?
Participanta duck!!!
Participanta duck!!!
Participanta duck!!!
Participanta duck!!!
Participanta duck!!!
ParticipantI call it cheating because in some situations they are not getting the top dollar for thier client the bank.
It has nothing to do with the buyer. If I have 5 days to get a buyer for a property I can gaurantee you I will get more buyers and a higher price by putting it on the MLS then not. The higher price in most cases will surpass the coop commission.
-
AuthorPosts
