Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay Brian
Since you seem to know so much about how appraisers work, why don’t you tell me how many appraisers you have personally worked with. Let me know how many of them dig through the county records to find useful comps.
The ones I have dealt with in my experience use the MLS. They may cross check whatever they are using with the county records but that is never a starting point. Furthermore when they find a data point that is way out of whack, they do not use it or they note it is an exception.
When you make an insinuation that this property could be used as a comp that an insult not to people who know about real estate but it lowers the bar for the entire blog.
*************
Additionally these people did record the sale. You got what you are entitled to Brian, a recorded sale. What irritates you is that you feel entitled to know the details of the transaction. Rather then think there are reasonable explanations you immediately feel it is your business to know because it doesn’t fit the data set. Why that is, I am not sure. Could it be that this person sold to a family member or a friend? Could it be that there is an explanation for it? Regardless of whether the reason is legal or not, why are you entitled to know the underlying circumstances? Is it your job? Are you an IRS agent? Are you an appraiser?
You see, the point here is that the data point not only does not fit the data set, it is so far from the data set, that it doesn’t matter. For you to cry about entitlement to find out the details is odd to me. What is more scary is that it is not a leap of faith to go from wanting to know the details about this sort of stuff, to wanting to know more details about other purchases, or other aspects of our lives that frankly are personal and to this point still gauranteed by our right to privacy.
ParticipantOkay Brian
Since you seem to know so much about how appraisers work, why don’t you tell me how many appraisers you have personally worked with. Let me know how many of them dig through the county records to find useful comps.
The ones I have dealt with in my experience use the MLS. They may cross check whatever they are using with the county records but that is never a starting point. Furthermore when they find a data point that is way out of whack, they do not use it or they note it is an exception.
When you make an insinuation that this property could be used as a comp that an insult not to people who know about real estate but it lowers the bar for the entire blog.
*************
Additionally these people did record the sale. You got what you are entitled to Brian, a recorded sale. What irritates you is that you feel entitled to know the details of the transaction. Rather then think there are reasonable explanations you immediately feel it is your business to know because it doesn’t fit the data set. Why that is, I am not sure. Could it be that this person sold to a family member or a friend? Could it be that there is an explanation for it? Regardless of whether the reason is legal or not, why are you entitled to know the underlying circumstances? Is it your job? Are you an IRS agent? Are you an appraiser?
You see, the point here is that the data point not only does not fit the data set, it is so far from the data set, that it doesn’t matter. For you to cry about entitlement to find out the details is odd to me. What is more scary is that it is not a leap of faith to go from wanting to know the details about this sort of stuff, to wanting to know more details about other purchases, or other aspects of our lives that frankly are personal and to this point still gauranteed by our right to privacy.
ParticipantOkay Brian
Since you seem to know so much about how appraisers work, why don’t you tell me how many appraisers you have personally worked with. Let me know how many of them dig through the county records to find useful comps.
The ones I have dealt with in my experience use the MLS. They may cross check whatever they are using with the county records but that is never a starting point. Furthermore when they find a data point that is way out of whack, they do not use it or they note it is an exception.
When you make an insinuation that this property could be used as a comp that an insult not to people who know about real estate but it lowers the bar for the entire blog.
*************
Additionally these people did record the sale. You got what you are entitled to Brian, a recorded sale. What irritates you is that you feel entitled to know the details of the transaction. Rather then think there are reasonable explanations you immediately feel it is your business to know because it doesn’t fit the data set. Why that is, I am not sure. Could it be that this person sold to a family member or a friend? Could it be that there is an explanation for it? Regardless of whether the reason is legal or not, why are you entitled to know the underlying circumstances? Is it your job? Are you an IRS agent? Are you an appraiser?
You see, the point here is that the data point not only does not fit the data set, it is so far from the data set, that it doesn’t matter. For you to cry about entitlement to find out the details is odd to me. What is more scary is that it is not a leap of faith to go from wanting to know the details about this sort of stuff, to wanting to know more details about other purchases, or other aspects of our lives that frankly are personal and to this point still gauranteed by our right to privacy.
ParticipantThe transaction was done by two private individuals. The recording is ENTIRELY the choice of those that are involved. Contrary to your self proclaimed right of entitlement, those parties have the choice to record or not record.
The assessors office will decide to assess the property at whatever valuation they feel is of fair value regardless of the recording.
The sale of the home was not on the MLS, the sale will not be used as a comp by some appraiser.
***********
What it sounds like to me is that it really is not yours or my business on this sale. Try to remember that the seller has every right to sell the home at whatever price they want to sell it at, to whoever they want to sell it at.
ParticipantThe transaction was done by two private individuals. The recording is ENTIRELY the choice of those that are involved. Contrary to your self proclaimed right of entitlement, those parties have the choice to record or not record.
The assessors office will decide to assess the property at whatever valuation they feel is of fair value regardless of the recording.
The sale of the home was not on the MLS, the sale will not be used as a comp by some appraiser.
***********
What it sounds like to me is that it really is not yours or my business on this sale. Try to remember that the seller has every right to sell the home at whatever price they want to sell it at, to whoever they want to sell it at.
ParticipantThe transaction was done by two private individuals. The recording is ENTIRELY the choice of those that are involved. Contrary to your self proclaimed right of entitlement, those parties have the choice to record or not record.
The assessors office will decide to assess the property at whatever valuation they feel is of fair value regardless of the recording.
The sale of the home was not on the MLS, the sale will not be used as a comp by some appraiser.
***********
What it sounds like to me is that it really is not yours or my business on this sale. Try to remember that the seller has every right to sell the home at whatever price they want to sell it at, to whoever they want to sell it at.
ParticipantThe transaction was done by two private individuals. The recording is ENTIRELY the choice of those that are involved. Contrary to your self proclaimed right of entitlement, those parties have the choice to record or not record.
The assessors office will decide to assess the property at whatever valuation they feel is of fair value regardless of the recording.
The sale of the home was not on the MLS, the sale will not be used as a comp by some appraiser.
***********
What it sounds like to me is that it really is not yours or my business on this sale. Try to remember that the seller has every right to sell the home at whatever price they want to sell it at, to whoever they want to sell it at.
ParticipantThe transaction was done by two private individuals. The recording is ENTIRELY the choice of those that are involved. Contrary to your self proclaimed right of entitlement, those parties have the choice to record or not record.
The assessors office will decide to assess the property at whatever valuation they feel is of fair value regardless of the recording.
The sale of the home was not on the MLS, the sale will not be used as a comp by some appraiser.
***********
What it sounds like to me is that it really is not yours or my business on this sale. Try to remember that the seller has every right to sell the home at whatever price they want to sell it at, to whoever they want to sell it at.
ParticipantAye caramba…
Really? In early America everyone knew about everyone and everything?
I see…
ParticipantAye caramba…
Really? In early America everyone knew about everyone and everything?
I see…
ParticipantAye caramba…
Really? In early America everyone knew about everyone and everything?
I see…
ParticipantAye caramba…
Really? In early America everyone knew about everyone and everything?
I see…
ParticipantAye caramba…
Really? In early America everyone knew about everyone and everything?
I see…
ParticipantActually I think there is a vast difference. As mentioned Scripps is SDUSD and Sabre is PUSD. Stonebridge however is PUSD as well. The variety of homes that Scripps offers contrasts widly and I break it down to 4 distint types/areas. Stonebridge is the newest with the largest homes and as you go deep in, the large lots. Tradeoffs include more home for your money with little to no community infrastructure and possible proximity to power lines. Getting in and out is viewed by some as a problem and by others as not a problem. Old Scripps south of pomerado is desireable and is a mix of older homes which most have been kept up, (built in the 70s) and new ones to replace those that burned in the fires. The main fire damage was done in this part of scripps. BTW this is my favorite part of Scripps but that is just personal choice. Old Scripps north of pomerado but south of spring canyon has a diverse selection of older homes built in the 70s with pockets of 80s vintage stuff as well. This is viewed as a step down from living sout of Pomerado and of course it is where I live now and enjoy it and have no complaints at all. New Scripps north of spring canyon is the carbon copy of Sabre Springs homes, maybe a bit larger and those that sit with a view are nice. New Scripps on the west side is a step above Sabre Springs as well in terms of home sizes, pricing and desireability. Sabre Springs is nice and I would characterize it as a cheaper alternative to 4S with 80s/90s stock of homes and served by PUSD. So yes SS and part of Scripps are very similar but only 1 part of Scripps.
-
AuthorPosts
