Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #518581February 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #519013
SD Realtor
ParticipantHmmm I could have sworn earlier in this thread you wrote the bailouts worked… something about progressives doing what works and preserving the status quo and keeping millions from falling into poverty.
Maybe I misread that….seems like your responses vary.
*************
Funny how it is always convenient to remind people about this mess not being originated by Obama.
Try to read what I wrote, they are all bad, libertarians are not progressives, not republicans, not democrats. No party lines Brian… they all suck. It doesn’t matter who caused it.
What matters is reversing it and we are in no way going in that direction.
February 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #519107SD Realtor
ParticipantHmmm I could have sworn earlier in this thread you wrote the bailouts worked… something about progressives doing what works and preserving the status quo and keeping millions from falling into poverty.
Maybe I misread that….seems like your responses vary.
*************
Funny how it is always convenient to remind people about this mess not being originated by Obama.
Try to read what I wrote, they are all bad, libertarians are not progressives, not republicans, not democrats. No party lines Brian… they all suck. It doesn’t matter who caused it.
What matters is reversing it and we are in no way going in that direction.
February 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #519361SD Realtor
ParticipantHmmm I could have sworn earlier in this thread you wrote the bailouts worked… something about progressives doing what works and preserving the status quo and keeping millions from falling into poverty.
Maybe I misread that….seems like your responses vary.
*************
Funny how it is always convenient to remind people about this mess not being originated by Obama.
Try to read what I wrote, they are all bad, libertarians are not progressives, not republicans, not democrats. No party lines Brian… they all suck. It doesn’t matter who caused it.
What matters is reversing it and we are in no way going in that direction.
February 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM in reply to: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review #518364SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya as a libertarian my prime faith is that govt should be used for a few functions as possible. The govt has proven to be inept in pretty much every single large program they have attempted regardless of party in power. Jeez Arraya they cannot even run the friggin postal service and break even. Failure in govt at county, state and federal levels is clearly evident to me, whether others see it or not is something I never understand.
Getting back to the main point, I am making my statements from a strict supply/demand perspective. This is simply a supply constriction measure to me, nothing more and nothing less. It will also help to increase bank dependence on the govt as it will only slowdown what I call the reconciliation process, disposing of non performing assets and getting the books cleaned up. The longer it takes banks to do this, the more they will need to be backstopped.
February 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM in reply to: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review #518506SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya as a libertarian my prime faith is that govt should be used for a few functions as possible. The govt has proven to be inept in pretty much every single large program they have attempted regardless of party in power. Jeez Arraya they cannot even run the friggin postal service and break even. Failure in govt at county, state and federal levels is clearly evident to me, whether others see it or not is something I never understand.
Getting back to the main point, I am making my statements from a strict supply/demand perspective. This is simply a supply constriction measure to me, nothing more and nothing less. It will also help to increase bank dependence on the govt as it will only slowdown what I call the reconciliation process, disposing of non performing assets and getting the books cleaned up. The longer it takes banks to do this, the more they will need to be backstopped.
February 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM in reply to: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review #518938SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya as a libertarian my prime faith is that govt should be used for a few functions as possible. The govt has proven to be inept in pretty much every single large program they have attempted regardless of party in power. Jeez Arraya they cannot even run the friggin postal service and break even. Failure in govt at county, state and federal levels is clearly evident to me, whether others see it or not is something I never understand.
Getting back to the main point, I am making my statements from a strict supply/demand perspective. This is simply a supply constriction measure to me, nothing more and nothing less. It will also help to increase bank dependence on the govt as it will only slowdown what I call the reconciliation process, disposing of non performing assets and getting the books cleaned up. The longer it takes banks to do this, the more they will need to be backstopped.
February 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM in reply to: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review #519032SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya as a libertarian my prime faith is that govt should be used for a few functions as possible. The govt has proven to be inept in pretty much every single large program they have attempted regardless of party in power. Jeez Arraya they cannot even run the friggin postal service and break even. Failure in govt at county, state and federal levels is clearly evident to me, whether others see it or not is something I never understand.
Getting back to the main point, I am making my statements from a strict supply/demand perspective. This is simply a supply constriction measure to me, nothing more and nothing less. It will also help to increase bank dependence on the govt as it will only slowdown what I call the reconciliation process, disposing of non performing assets and getting the books cleaned up. The longer it takes banks to do this, the more they will need to be backstopped.
February 26, 2010 at 9:00 AM in reply to: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review #519286SD Realtor
ParticipantArraya as a libertarian my prime faith is that govt should be used for a few functions as possible. The govt has proven to be inept in pretty much every single large program they have attempted regardless of party in power. Jeez Arraya they cannot even run the friggin postal service and break even. Failure in govt at county, state and federal levels is clearly evident to me, whether others see it or not is something I never understand.
Getting back to the main point, I am making my statements from a strict supply/demand perspective. This is simply a supply constriction measure to me, nothing more and nothing less. It will also help to increase bank dependence on the govt as it will only slowdown what I call the reconciliation process, disposing of non performing assets and getting the books cleaned up. The longer it takes banks to do this, the more they will need to be backstopped.
February 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #518229SD Realtor
ParticipantHow do we know the bailouts worked?
How do we know that the financial system would have failed. Sure this is what we have been told but do you believe everything the govt tells you?
To me the bailouts have done nothing but preserved the system and resulted in keeping those who had power and wealth, in that same position if not solidifying the positions they had.
I guess if you are happy with the way things were then yes they worked.
No pain, no gain. Just remember the chaos you think we averted is chaos that you were told would happen, that you have been programmed would happen, and that your government 100% counted on you to believe it would happen so a bailout MUST be passed immediately. In fact, to take a page from Arrayas handbook, if the chaos would not have happened, maybe our govt would have…. created some chaos.
Never waste a good emergency.
February 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #518370SD Realtor
ParticipantHow do we know the bailouts worked?
How do we know that the financial system would have failed. Sure this is what we have been told but do you believe everything the govt tells you?
To me the bailouts have done nothing but preserved the system and resulted in keeping those who had power and wealth, in that same position if not solidifying the positions they had.
I guess if you are happy with the way things were then yes they worked.
No pain, no gain. Just remember the chaos you think we averted is chaos that you were told would happen, that you have been programmed would happen, and that your government 100% counted on you to believe it would happen so a bailout MUST be passed immediately. In fact, to take a page from Arrayas handbook, if the chaos would not have happened, maybe our govt would have…. created some chaos.
Never waste a good emergency.
February 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #518803SD Realtor
ParticipantHow do we know the bailouts worked?
How do we know that the financial system would have failed. Sure this is what we have been told but do you believe everything the govt tells you?
To me the bailouts have done nothing but preserved the system and resulted in keeping those who had power and wealth, in that same position if not solidifying the positions they had.
I guess if you are happy with the way things were then yes they worked.
No pain, no gain. Just remember the chaos you think we averted is chaos that you were told would happen, that you have been programmed would happen, and that your government 100% counted on you to believe it would happen so a bailout MUST be passed immediately. In fact, to take a page from Arrayas handbook, if the chaos would not have happened, maybe our govt would have…. created some chaos.
Never waste a good emergency.
February 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #518897SD Realtor
ParticipantHow do we know the bailouts worked?
How do we know that the financial system would have failed. Sure this is what we have been told but do you believe everything the govt tells you?
To me the bailouts have done nothing but preserved the system and resulted in keeping those who had power and wealth, in that same position if not solidifying the positions they had.
I guess if you are happy with the way things were then yes they worked.
No pain, no gain. Just remember the chaos you think we averted is chaos that you were told would happen, that you have been programmed would happen, and that your government 100% counted on you to believe it would happen so a bailout MUST be passed immediately. In fact, to take a page from Arrayas handbook, if the chaos would not have happened, maybe our govt would have…. created some chaos.
Never waste a good emergency.
February 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM in reply to: Straight from horses mouth – Schiller says “substantial downward risk” #519150SD Realtor
ParticipantHow do we know the bailouts worked?
How do we know that the financial system would have failed. Sure this is what we have been told but do you believe everything the govt tells you?
To me the bailouts have done nothing but preserved the system and resulted in keeping those who had power and wealth, in that same position if not solidifying the positions they had.
I guess if you are happy with the way things were then yes they worked.
No pain, no gain. Just remember the chaos you think we averted is chaos that you were told would happen, that you have been programmed would happen, and that your government 100% counted on you to believe it would happen so a bailout MUST be passed immediately. In fact, to take a page from Arrayas handbook, if the chaos would not have happened, maybe our govt would have…. created some chaos.
Never waste a good emergency.
SD Realtor
ParticipantI was tempted to say combat but will stick with all veterans.
-
AuthorPosts
