Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantYour post had two sentences, one of which was incorrect. Just stating the facts.
ParticipantThis is awesome!!
Raise taxes a little bit but don’t spend any less.
December 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM in reply to: Green techs:: A123 systems…Funded by the U.S., Purchased by China…. #756944ParticipantDon’t worry it is only our tax dollars at work.
ParticipantContrary to your statement, the Chargers are perenially at or near the cap. Try to see the difference between poor coaching, and inept management with being a cheapskate.
ParticipantI agree with the inventory and price assessments. It is a very frustrating time for buyers and I don’t see it changing at all in the near future until rates move. Bodes well for those who have purchased in the last few years. Does not bode well for families looking to buy a home/condo for themselves or for a long term investment.
December 17, 2012 at 12:31 PM in reply to: Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy #756463ParticipantFunny, you keep going back to money and I keep talking about a quality of life. You don’t need money to have a decent quality of life, that goes without saying. However living in a society with quality goods and services sure is nice. Same thing with availability to basic necessities and not having to scramble for things.
I am sure it is alot nicer living in a spacious home in Temecula then living in a 1 or 2 bedroom apartment in Riverside. You may not care but your kids and wife sure would.
You can keep reciting your optimistic mantra and ignoring the real financial condition of the country.
December 16, 2012 at 9:46 PM in reply to: Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy #756419ParticipantI love the logic. So let me get this straight. When our kids grow up they will have less opportunity to get quality jobs. They will live in a country that is riddled with debt and could have by then defaulted. They will live in a society that does not enjoy the same benefits as the society that their parents lived in at both the state and federal levels. They will have a currency that is worth less then it was when they were kids. They will have to compete much harder for jobs. They may have advance degrees but may have to settle for jobs that do not require them.
However your argument is that they will be happier? That logic is based on what? That they will be happier because they did not know what it was like to live in a better society?
So if you never got to live through better times, you will be happier living in crappier times.
Awesome logic man… just awesome.
December 15, 2012 at 7:43 PM in reply to: Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy #756354ParticipantI think getting in good physical health is a good thing to do. I agree that the can has been kicked down the road so long that it is easy to form an illusion. Inflating our way out of the mess will not work given the quantity of debt we are carrying. While the value of the notes that are held decrease due to the currency approaching what will be turd wipe status, each bond auction will require a higher and higher interest rate. Similarly price inflation without wage inflation will be very tough to handle.
With very few exceptions, conditions will be much harsher for our children then they have been for us.
December 13, 2012 at 9:09 PM in reply to: Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy #756274ParticipantAnything is possible.
It is possible I will win the lottery. Highly improbably but possible.
Just in case I don’t though I am trying to take some measures to be prepared. I think having land and water is a good first step.
December 13, 2012 at 8:36 AM in reply to: Quantitative Easing Benefits the Super-Elite … And Hurts the Little Guy and the American Economy #756238ParticipantObviously Bush is behind all of this, even QE4, 5, 6 and 7!
ParticipantYou said the property was a short sale correct? why don’t you have your agent contact the listing agent and ask if you could start the utilities up in your name if the short sale gets accepted. This will be a small expense compared with the relatively large expense of that could be accrued with a poor diagnosis.
All they could say is no. Not much risk there is it?
December 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM in reply to: Taxing the rich more? How about making companies bring money back…… #756092ParticipantHere is a good site:
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/
Go to the spending tab. Then you can plug in any year to see spending itemized by fairly major categories. You can then drill down into each category for subcategories. It is fairly laborious but it is as close to an unbiased presentation of numbers as it gets.
I really wish that each plan both from team obama, and team pub would simply tell me where the spending cuts would come from based on spending in each of these categories. I also want to see the breakdown year by year.
Honestly a 1 or 2 or 4 trillion dollar reduction in the next 10 years doesn’t comfort me much especially when we are projected to hit 20T in the next 4 years.
December 11, 2012 at 12:07 PM in reply to: Taxing the rich more? How about making companies bring money back…… #756087ParticipantKind of like saying there were no cuts to medicare during the election but counting cuts to medicare now as spending reductions.
ParticipantThere is some pending litigation regarding 4S Master HOA due to some construction defects involving common area.
-
AuthorPosts
