Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
SD Realtor
ParticipantYes Brian we better set up a regulatory structure with the govt protecting people from craigslist and protecting disneyland from people like me and sdr. That way everyone can be protected with taxpayer money.
ParticipantYes Brian we better set up a regulatory structure with the govt protecting people from craigslist and protecting disneyland from people like me and sdr. That way everyone can be protected with taxpayer money.
ParticipantYes Brian we better set up a regulatory structure with the govt protecting people from craigslist and protecting disneyland from people like me and sdr. That way everyone can be protected with taxpayer money.
ParticipantIt is tough for me because I have a slight anti stonebridge bias built in… Don’t get me wrong I like it, and for me personally I think you get more home/land in Stonebridge then 4S but it is a tough commute in and out of…not convenient for getting groceries or basically anything. Also it is a bit lunar for me…. needs time for the trees to grow and become more lush if that is possible out there. To me it kind of sits and bakes in the sun.
I don’t mean to bash Stonebridge because as I read it, it sounds like I am but I am not. I know alot of people living there and I dont think one person I know there doesn’t really enjoy it. So I do think it will go down as more economic distress rolls out but I think it will happen slowly. The new home sales are moving pretty well there as well and I think as things slow down the builders will be forced to give some concessions as sales slow. A few posters did well in 2008 when things really crapped out up there.
ParticipantIt is tough for me because I have a slight anti stonebridge bias built in… Don’t get me wrong I like it, and for me personally I think you get more home/land in Stonebridge then 4S but it is a tough commute in and out of…not convenient for getting groceries or basically anything. Also it is a bit lunar for me…. needs time for the trees to grow and become more lush if that is possible out there. To me it kind of sits and bakes in the sun.
I don’t mean to bash Stonebridge because as I read it, it sounds like I am but I am not. I know alot of people living there and I dont think one person I know there doesn’t really enjoy it. So I do think it will go down as more economic distress rolls out but I think it will happen slowly. The new home sales are moving pretty well there as well and I think as things slow down the builders will be forced to give some concessions as sales slow. A few posters did well in 2008 when things really crapped out up there.
ParticipantIt is tough for me because I have a slight anti stonebridge bias built in… Don’t get me wrong I like it, and for me personally I think you get more home/land in Stonebridge then 4S but it is a tough commute in and out of…not convenient for getting groceries or basically anything. Also it is a bit lunar for me…. needs time for the trees to grow and become more lush if that is possible out there. To me it kind of sits and bakes in the sun.
I don’t mean to bash Stonebridge because as I read it, it sounds like I am but I am not. I know alot of people living there and I dont think one person I know there doesn’t really enjoy it. So I do think it will go down as more economic distress rolls out but I think it will happen slowly. The new home sales are moving pretty well there as well and I think as things slow down the builders will be forced to give some concessions as sales slow. A few posters did well in 2008 when things really crapped out up there.
ParticipantIt is tough for me because I have a slight anti stonebridge bias built in… Don’t get me wrong I like it, and for me personally I think you get more home/land in Stonebridge then 4S but it is a tough commute in and out of…not convenient for getting groceries or basically anything. Also it is a bit lunar for me…. needs time for the trees to grow and become more lush if that is possible out there. To me it kind of sits and bakes in the sun.
I don’t mean to bash Stonebridge because as I read it, it sounds like I am but I am not. I know alot of people living there and I dont think one person I know there doesn’t really enjoy it. So I do think it will go down as more economic distress rolls out but I think it will happen slowly. The new home sales are moving pretty well there as well and I think as things slow down the builders will be forced to give some concessions as sales slow. A few posters did well in 2008 when things really crapped out up there.
ParticipantIt is tough for me because I have a slight anti stonebridge bias built in… Don’t get me wrong I like it, and for me personally I think you get more home/land in Stonebridge then 4S but it is a tough commute in and out of…not convenient for getting groceries or basically anything. Also it is a bit lunar for me…. needs time for the trees to grow and become more lush if that is possible out there. To me it kind of sits and bakes in the sun.
I don’t mean to bash Stonebridge because as I read it, it sounds like I am but I am not. I know alot of people living there and I dont think one person I know there doesn’t really enjoy it. So I do think it will go down as more economic distress rolls out but I think it will happen slowly. The new home sales are moving pretty well there as well and I think as things slow down the builders will be forced to give some concessions as sales slow. A few posters did well in 2008 when things really crapped out up there.
August 16, 2010 at 9:50 PM in reply to: Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History” #591870ParticipantWell it makes some sense but breaks down on the jobs part.
Here is what I do not understand…. Everyone says bring the jobs back. Bring them back! Like it is no problem to do so… However if there are people who will do the same job for 1/10 of the cost of an American employee then how exactly does that work? If American union jobs benefit the american employee somewhat but a nice percentage of that salary goes to the union which then goes to lobbyists, then how does that work as well?
The crux of it is that “american jobs” carry so much overhead with the salary that the answer is that IT DOESNT WORK.
The big admission here is that a percentage of the American labor force has priced themselves out of jobs. The govt has compounded the problems by awarding corporations for outsourcing as well and all that infrastructure buildout did not happen in a year and you cannot throw a switch and expect it to be reversed in a year… or two…or five. Similarly the effort it will take to return those jobs is indescribeable and the bottom line it that it will hurt the companies it is aimed at which will hurt their bottom line and their stock price which will hurt Wall St which controls the govt…
savy?
August 16, 2010 at 9:50 PM in reply to: Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History” #591964ParticipantWell it makes some sense but breaks down on the jobs part.
Here is what I do not understand…. Everyone says bring the jobs back. Bring them back! Like it is no problem to do so… However if there are people who will do the same job for 1/10 of the cost of an American employee then how exactly does that work? If American union jobs benefit the american employee somewhat but a nice percentage of that salary goes to the union which then goes to lobbyists, then how does that work as well?
The crux of it is that “american jobs” carry so much overhead with the salary that the answer is that IT DOESNT WORK.
The big admission here is that a percentage of the American labor force has priced themselves out of jobs. The govt has compounded the problems by awarding corporations for outsourcing as well and all that infrastructure buildout did not happen in a year and you cannot throw a switch and expect it to be reversed in a year… or two…or five. Similarly the effort it will take to return those jobs is indescribeable and the bottom line it that it will hurt the companies it is aimed at which will hurt their bottom line and their stock price which will hurt Wall St which controls the govt…
savy?
August 16, 2010 at 9:50 PM in reply to: Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History” #592500ParticipantWell it makes some sense but breaks down on the jobs part.
Here is what I do not understand…. Everyone says bring the jobs back. Bring them back! Like it is no problem to do so… However if there are people who will do the same job for 1/10 of the cost of an American employee then how exactly does that work? If American union jobs benefit the american employee somewhat but a nice percentage of that salary goes to the union which then goes to lobbyists, then how does that work as well?
The crux of it is that “american jobs” carry so much overhead with the salary that the answer is that IT DOESNT WORK.
The big admission here is that a percentage of the American labor force has priced themselves out of jobs. The govt has compounded the problems by awarding corporations for outsourcing as well and all that infrastructure buildout did not happen in a year and you cannot throw a switch and expect it to be reversed in a year… or two…or five. Similarly the effort it will take to return those jobs is indescribeable and the bottom line it that it will hurt the companies it is aimed at which will hurt their bottom line and their stock price which will hurt Wall St which controls the govt…
savy?
August 16, 2010 at 9:50 PM in reply to: Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History” #592612ParticipantWell it makes some sense but breaks down on the jobs part.
Here is what I do not understand…. Everyone says bring the jobs back. Bring them back! Like it is no problem to do so… However if there are people who will do the same job for 1/10 of the cost of an American employee then how exactly does that work? If American union jobs benefit the american employee somewhat but a nice percentage of that salary goes to the union which then goes to lobbyists, then how does that work as well?
The crux of it is that “american jobs” carry so much overhead with the salary that the answer is that IT DOESNT WORK.
The big admission here is that a percentage of the American labor force has priced themselves out of jobs. The govt has compounded the problems by awarding corporations for outsourcing as well and all that infrastructure buildout did not happen in a year and you cannot throw a switch and expect it to be reversed in a year… or two…or five. Similarly the effort it will take to return those jobs is indescribeable and the bottom line it that it will hurt the companies it is aimed at which will hurt their bottom line and their stock price which will hurt Wall St which controls the govt…
savy?
August 16, 2010 at 9:50 PM in reply to: Founder Of Reaganomics Says That “Without A Revolution, Americans Are History” #592920ParticipantWell it makes some sense but breaks down on the jobs part.
Here is what I do not understand…. Everyone says bring the jobs back. Bring them back! Like it is no problem to do so… However if there are people who will do the same job for 1/10 of the cost of an American employee then how exactly does that work? If American union jobs benefit the american employee somewhat but a nice percentage of that salary goes to the union which then goes to lobbyists, then how does that work as well?
The crux of it is that “american jobs” carry so much overhead with the salary that the answer is that IT DOESNT WORK.
The big admission here is that a percentage of the American labor force has priced themselves out of jobs. The govt has compounded the problems by awarding corporations for outsourcing as well and all that infrastructure buildout did not happen in a year and you cannot throw a switch and expect it to be reversed in a year… or two…or five. Similarly the effort it will take to return those jobs is indescribeable and the bottom line it that it will hurt the companies it is aimed at which will hurt their bottom line and their stock price which will hurt Wall St which controls the govt…
savy?
ParticipantCannot argue about the sentiment of Old Scripps. I feel the same way. My favorite is still south of Pomerado but I am okay with alot of Old Scripps. Very community oriented.
-
AuthorPosts
