Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659755January 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660358
SD Realtor
ParticipantI am not taking anything personally. You can look at all my posts and anytime anyone says anything contrary to what is either the truth or what is the reality of what goes on in transactions I speak up.
I am not worried about anything.
Tell us all, since you have been licensed so long, when exactly was your last transaction? In fact when was your last short sale?
As for what NAR or CAR or even SDAR does, I honestly do not care one bit.
The entire premise of your rants have been that buyers spend lots of money before they find out about liens. This is a blatant falsehood. All I am asserting is that what you are saying is not true. The court case is fine and I hope that agent gets what is coming to them.
I am attacking you for making statements about buyers putting out alot of money before being able to find out liens in a short sale.
Just because an escrow is opened doesn’t mean a thing. The buyer does not have to spend a penny. Contingencies have not started in a short sale until written approval is obtained from the lender/lenders involved. Everything can be found out (and usually is found out) weeks and even months before the approval is completed.
Your assertions that buyers are putting out money because they cannot find out this information are false. You are telling a lie. Your other allegations about short sales falling through because of your litany of judgements and other reasons… well I will ask you AGAIN…you said you were going to talk to realtors and find out about how many transactions this occurred in? Well? I am still waiting.
I am not taking anything personally. I am one of a few people who can call you out on this. The bottom line is you know deep down that buyers can find out all of this information and instead of saying, “yes buyers can find out about this” you would rather do anything you can to not say that.
January 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660497ParticipantI am not taking anything personally. You can look at all my posts and anytime anyone says anything contrary to what is either the truth or what is the reality of what goes on in transactions I speak up.
I am not worried about anything.
Tell us all, since you have been licensed so long, when exactly was your last transaction? In fact when was your last short sale?
As for what NAR or CAR or even SDAR does, I honestly do not care one bit.
The entire premise of your rants have been that buyers spend lots of money before they find out about liens. This is a blatant falsehood. All I am asserting is that what you are saying is not true. The court case is fine and I hope that agent gets what is coming to them.
I am attacking you for making statements about buyers putting out alot of money before being able to find out liens in a short sale.
Just because an escrow is opened doesn’t mean a thing. The buyer does not have to spend a penny. Contingencies have not started in a short sale until written approval is obtained from the lender/lenders involved. Everything can be found out (and usually is found out) weeks and even months before the approval is completed.
Your assertions that buyers are putting out money because they cannot find out this information are false. You are telling a lie. Your other allegations about short sales falling through because of your litany of judgements and other reasons… well I will ask you AGAIN…you said you were going to talk to realtors and find out about how many transactions this occurred in? Well? I am still waiting.
I am not taking anything personally. I am one of a few people who can call you out on this. The bottom line is you know deep down that buyers can find out all of this information and instead of saying, “yes buyers can find out about this” you would rather do anything you can to not say that.
January 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660826ParticipantI am not taking anything personally. You can look at all my posts and anytime anyone says anything contrary to what is either the truth or what is the reality of what goes on in transactions I speak up.
I am not worried about anything.
Tell us all, since you have been licensed so long, when exactly was your last transaction? In fact when was your last short sale?
As for what NAR or CAR or even SDAR does, I honestly do not care one bit.
The entire premise of your rants have been that buyers spend lots of money before they find out about liens. This is a blatant falsehood. All I am asserting is that what you are saying is not true. The court case is fine and I hope that agent gets what is coming to them.
I am attacking you for making statements about buyers putting out alot of money before being able to find out liens in a short sale.
Just because an escrow is opened doesn’t mean a thing. The buyer does not have to spend a penny. Contingencies have not started in a short sale until written approval is obtained from the lender/lenders involved. Everything can be found out (and usually is found out) weeks and even months before the approval is completed.
Your assertions that buyers are putting out money because they cannot find out this information are false. You are telling a lie. Your other allegations about short sales falling through because of your litany of judgements and other reasons… well I will ask you AGAIN…you said you were going to talk to realtors and find out about how many transactions this occurred in? Well? I am still waiting.
I am not taking anything personally. I am one of a few people who can call you out on this. The bottom line is you know deep down that buyers can find out all of this information and instead of saying, “yes buyers can find out about this” you would rather do anything you can to not say that.
January 29, 2011 at 3:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659617ParticipantI honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.
I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.
*********
Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.
Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?
Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.
I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.
January 29, 2011 at 3:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659680ParticipantI honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.
I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.
*********
Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.
Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?
Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.
I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.
January 29, 2011 at 3:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660283ParticipantI honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.
I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.
*********
Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.
Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?
Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.
I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.
January 29, 2011 at 3:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660422ParticipantI honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.
I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.
*********
Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.
Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?
Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.
I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.
January 29, 2011 at 3:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660751ParticipantI honestly keep asking myself why I am wasting my time but then I keep thinking that there may be some people on here who actually learn useful items from the site.
I recall many a post where people called out fraud on transactions only to be corrected when a little bit of actual legwork was done.
*********
Anyone who is a notch above a dimwit and has submitted an actual package for a short sale understands how accurate the estimated HUD should be. To get an accurate HUD you ask your escrow officer to call title and get a PR. The buyer has not yet spent a penny, and the contingency period has not started yet. Guess what, I JUST DID IT 10 DAYS AGO BEFORE I SUBMITTED A PACKAGE FOR A LISTING I HAVE.
Really, it is almost embarassing at this point okay?
Tell you what, go get your license, and start practicing. Then you can tell us all about the transactions you perform.
I am trying to not be civil but it is getting difficult.
January 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659557ParticipantI read yourfirst statement and did not read the rest because you were wrong.
The PR is available WHENEVER YOU WANT TO ORDER ONE.
When you want to step into the present we can discuss things. Until then I pity people who follow advice is given from someone who has not touched a transaction in a few decades.
Try maybe to say that this would not have happened to these people if they had a competent agent representing them.
January 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659620ParticipantI read yourfirst statement and did not read the rest because you were wrong.
The PR is available WHENEVER YOU WANT TO ORDER ONE.
When you want to step into the present we can discuss things. Until then I pity people who follow advice is given from someone who has not touched a transaction in a few decades.
Try maybe to say that this would not have happened to these people if they had a competent agent representing them.
January 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660223ParticipantI read yourfirst statement and did not read the rest because you were wrong.
The PR is available WHENEVER YOU WANT TO ORDER ONE.
When you want to step into the present we can discuss things. Until then I pity people who follow advice is given from someone who has not touched a transaction in a few decades.
Try maybe to say that this would not have happened to these people if they had a competent agent representing them.
January 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660361ParticipantI read yourfirst statement and did not read the rest because you were wrong.
The PR is available WHENEVER YOU WANT TO ORDER ONE.
When you want to step into the present we can discuss things. Until then I pity people who follow advice is given from someone who has not touched a transaction in a few decades.
Try maybe to say that this would not have happened to these people if they had a competent agent representing them.
January 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #660691ParticipantI read yourfirst statement and did not read the rest because you were wrong.
The PR is available WHENEVER YOU WANT TO ORDER ONE.
When you want to step into the present we can discuss things. Until then I pity people who follow advice is given from someone who has not touched a transaction in a few decades.
Try maybe to say that this would not have happened to these people if they had a competent agent representing them.
January 29, 2011 at 9:20 AM in reply to: Landmark State Decision in RE Agency and Disclosure Law #659507ParticipantI think that if anything is learned from this lawsuit it is that buyers should beware when they choose to work directly through a listing agent. I think that for buyers who are savvy and know what is going on then there may be some benefit as they can potentially try to gain position in a competitive bidding process. However if you are assuming your representation is going to be top notch then that is an incorrect assumption.
-
AuthorPosts
