[Scarlett]

B of A CDs rate is 0.4% for 9 months risk free, and 0.8% for 1 yr HIGH YIELD (is that a joke?!)

I didn’t even know that you COULD have less than 1% returns on a CD – they should be embarassed. I’d rather keep my money in a safe at home.

[Scarlett]

I think the Feds should actually INCREASE the rate half point (temporary, while planning to bring it lower all along) and see how many get scared and jump from the fence and buy houses.

[Scarlett]

I think the Feds should actually INCREASE the rate half point (temporary, while planning to bring it lower all along) and see how many get scared and jump from the fence and buy houses.

[Scarlett]

I think the Feds should actually INCREASE the rate half point (temporary, while planning to bring it lower all along) and see how many get scared and jump from the fence and buy houses.

[Scarlett]

I think the Feds should actually INCREASE the rate half point (temporary, while planning to bring it lower all along) and see how many get scared and jump from the fence and buy houses.

[Scarlett]

I think the Feds should actually INCREASE the rate half point (temporary, while planning to bring it lower all along) and see how many get scared and jump from the fence and buy houses.

[Scarlett]

[quote=flu] what if rates are so low, that monthly payments (…) lower than your typical rent prices? I think that would bring out some sideline folks…[/quote]
But the rents are or could be falling too, maintaining (in SoCal at least) the renter’s advantage?

[quote=flu]The next thing though, is what about down payment? Well, what if that was somehow subsidized? Seems like a win win win situation to me for fed/state/banks at the expense of the rest of the folks paying for such subsidies.[/quote]

I am not sure I understand – how would that be different, or “better” than your previously common 0-5% down?

[Scarlett]

[quote=flu] what if rates are so low, that monthly payments (…) lower than your typical rent prices? I think that would bring out some sideline folks…[/quote]
But the rents are or could be falling too, maintaining (in SoCal at least) the renter’s advantage?

[quote=flu]The next thing though, is what about down payment? Well, what if that was somehow subsidized? Seems like a win win win situation to me for fed/state/banks at the expense of the rest of the folks paying for such subsidies.[/quote]

I am not sure I understand – how would that be different, or “better” than your previously common 0-5% down?

[Scarlett]

[quote=flu] what if rates are so low, that monthly payments (…) lower than your typical rent prices? I think that would bring out some sideline folks…[/quote]
But the rents are or could be falling too, maintaining (in SoCal at least) the renter’s advantage?

[quote=flu]The next thing though, is what about down payment? Well, what if that was somehow subsidized? Seems like a win win win situation to me for fed/state/banks at the expense of the rest of the folks paying for such subsidies.[/quote]

I am not sure I understand – how would that be different, or “better” than your previously common 0-5% down?

[Scarlett]

[quote=flu] what if rates are so low, that monthly payments (…) lower than your typical rent prices? I think that would bring out some sideline folks…[/quote]
But the rents are or could be falling too, maintaining (in SoCal at least) the renter’s advantage?

[quote=flu]The next thing though, is what about down payment? Well, what if that was somehow subsidized? Seems like a win win win situation to me for fed/state/banks at the expense of the rest of the folks paying for such subsidies.[/quote]

I am not sure I understand – how would that be different, or “better” than your previously common 0-5% down?

[Scarlett]

[quote=flu] what if rates are so low, that monthly payments (…) lower than your typical rent prices? I think that would bring out some sideline folks…[/quote]
But the rents are or could be falling too, maintaining (in SoCal at least) the renter’s advantage?

[quote=flu]The next thing though, is what about down payment? Well, what if that was somehow subsidized? Seems like a win win win situation to me for fed/state/banks at the expense of the rest of the folks paying for such subsidies.[/quote]

I am not sure I understand – how would that be different, or “better” than your previously common 0-5% down?

[Scarlett]

Plan 4 needs to be into the low to mid 500s to be a steal, IMHO. And the others plans accordingly into high 400s…Remember, NO yard.

[Scarlett]

Plan 4 needs to be into the low to mid 500s to be a steal, IMHO. And the others plans accordingly into high 400s…Remember, NO yard.

[Scarlett]

Plan 4 needs to be into the low to mid 500s to be a steal, IMHO. And the others plans accordingly into high 400s…Remember, NO yard.

[Scarlett]

Plan 4 needs to be into the low to mid 500s to be a steal, IMHO. And the others plans accordingly into high 400s…Remember, NO yard.

[Author]

Posts