Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609733
Scarlett
ParticipantWhile the concept of Bubbles that the authors of Aftershock has a lot of merit, I don’t think the situation is going to be as bad as they describe it there. It’s a possibility certainly, but just because they were right once, shouldn’t be the main argument why we should listen to them.
September 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609821ParticipantWhile the concept of Bubbles that the authors of Aftershock has a lot of merit, I don’t think the situation is going to be as bad as they describe it there. It’s a possibility certainly, but just because they were right once, shouldn’t be the main argument why we should listen to them.
September 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610369ParticipantWhile the concept of Bubbles that the authors of Aftershock has a lot of merit, I don’t think the situation is going to be as bad as they describe it there. It’s a possibility certainly, but just because they were right once, shouldn’t be the main argument why we should listen to them.
September 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610481ParticipantWhile the concept of Bubbles that the authors of Aftershock has a lot of merit, I don’t think the situation is going to be as bad as they describe it there. It’s a possibility certainly, but just because they were right once, shouldn’t be the main argument why we should listen to them.
September 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610798ParticipantWhile the concept of Bubbles that the authors of Aftershock has a lot of merit, I don’t think the situation is going to be as bad as they describe it there. It’s a possibility certainly, but just because they were right once, shouldn’t be the main argument why we should listen to them.
September 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609708ParticipantMulti-nationals?
What do you mean? I have double citizenship and pay American taxes…
September 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609796ParticipantMulti-nationals?
What do you mean? I have double citizenship and pay American taxes…
September 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610344ParticipantMulti-nationals?
What do you mean? I have double citizenship and pay American taxes…
September 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610456ParticipantMulti-nationals?
What do you mean? I have double citizenship and pay American taxes…
September 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610773ParticipantMulti-nationals?
What do you mean? I have double citizenship and pay American taxes…
ParticipantThe noise from 56 is noticeable in the properties with even numbers – i.e.backing into 56. We went into one a while back.But only in the back yards. It wouldn’t bother us much because we’d commute at those rush hours when the noise is worse…Inside the house – noise from 56 wasn’t a problem. But perhaps we are more tolerant to white noise than others.
ParticipantThe noise from 56 is noticeable in the properties with even numbers – i.e.backing into 56. We went into one a while back.But only in the back yards. It wouldn’t bother us much because we’d commute at those rush hours when the noise is worse…Inside the house – noise from 56 wasn’t a problem. But perhaps we are more tolerant to white noise than others.
ParticipantThe noise from 56 is noticeable in the properties with even numbers – i.e.backing into 56. We went into one a while back.But only in the back yards. It wouldn’t bother us much because we’d commute at those rush hours when the noise is worse…Inside the house – noise from 56 wasn’t a problem. But perhaps we are more tolerant to white noise than others.
ParticipantThe noise from 56 is noticeable in the properties with even numbers – i.e.backing into 56. We went into one a while back.But only in the back yards. It wouldn’t bother us much because we’d commute at those rush hours when the noise is worse…Inside the house – noise from 56 wasn’t a problem. But perhaps we are more tolerant to white noise than others.
-
AuthorPosts
