Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
RockemsockParticipant
What makes those homes so unique that they would only go up 25% in the last 7 year boom? That is really surprising. Regardless, the fact that they are furnished makes them more marketable…albeit risky in my opinion. It still sounds like a “but this place is different” argument.
RockemsockParticipantSo over the weekend we revisited with some friends because we wanted to see these homes furnished. Guess what! They still aren’t furnished…AND…the realtor said they will probably NOT be furnished!
What’s the deal? I can’t imagine that the builders are trying to save the money on furnishing these homes (temporarily at that) at the cost of losing some appeal and sale-ability. Could it be that they actually have enough interest already?
RockemsockParticipantSo over the weekend we revisited with some friends because we wanted to see these homes furnished. Guess what! They still aren’t furnished…AND…the realtor said they will probably NOT be furnished!
What’s the deal? I can’t imagine that the builders are trying to save the money on furnishing these homes (temporarily at that) at the cost of losing some appeal and sale-ability. Could it be that they actually have enough interest already?
September 27, 2007 at 1:09 PM in reply to: Fairbanks Ranch vs. Santaluz vs. Cielo vs. rest of Rancho Santa Fe #86127RockemsockParticipant$4500 rent for 1800sf in 1997!
Googling ‘Toronto Raptors owner’
Googling ‘Anahiem Ducks owner’
———
anyhow, as far as the marine layer is concerned, i would assume it depends on the geography of the area. In Encinitas, I was 3 miles inland and we rarely had that marine layer around for long (burned off around 11am if not earlier). But we lived on the water for a year (546 4th St. in Encinitas) and the marine layer was with us for most of the day during May and June and a bit of July. But all the places you are looking at are much farther inland than that, obviously.
Also, another thing to think about, is the associations and their building commitees and all that goodness. I remember a thread from a few months back about Del Mar building commitee and people not wanting to live in the associated part of Del Mar because it was nearly impossible to make any significant changes to the house, etc. Perhaps someone remembers the thread.
RockemsockParticipantCould it be that the easy-money made in RE over the past 5 years and the subseqent drought has caused Rookie-RE agents to show some signs of frustration? That response is a classic. I’m sure that the orignal recipient, although currently represented, will consider that agents services in the future…and indeed recommend that agent…all because of the professional and curtious response. ;^)
September 26, 2007 at 11:40 AM in reply to: Fairbanks Ranch vs. Santaluz vs. Cielo vs. rest of Rancho Santa Fe #85983RockemsockParticipantMaybe it’s just because I was used to driving in LA traffic, but “Nightmare” traffic seems a bit extreme. I lived in Encinitas for 5 years (moved a few months ago) and commuted into Sorrento Valley daily. I typically left my house at 8:30 and arrived just after 9 (35 minutes), and I left at 7 and got home in just over 20 minutes. Driving home at that time was a bit easier because traffic north on the 5 at the merge (Racetrack) was lighter. Driving into work I tried multiple different routes and the one I enjoyed the most was taking side-streets through Rancho Santa Fe all the way to Via De La Valle (the racetrack). The 5 is rarely slow after Via De La Valle down into Sorrento Valley. The reason I liked going through RSF, is because there was NEVER any traffic…you drive slower, and have stop signs on occasion, or get behind someone that is checking out the scenery, but it’s still a much more enjoyable commute…even if it takes a few extra minutes.
Honestly, I now live much farther north in San Elijo Hills and I still prefer the drive through RSF…it takes me about 10-15 longer than it used to, depending on what time I leave, but there’s just something about the rural roads through beautiful countryside that makes commuting more enjoyable.
On a side note, is it too much of a hassle to rent in RSF? You could rent for a year and then really get a feel for the area. Not to mention the fact that just about every person on this site will suggest that holding out is a safe bet.
Good luck and welcome to Heaven on Earth (leave your rain-gear up north, you won’t need it).
September 12, 2007 at 9:48 AM in reply to: August numbers out. No impact of the credit crunch in San Diego… #84263RockemsockParticipantI’m not that surprised to see these numbers for August. The credit crunch really happened at the beginning of August, so all those homes that were in escrow prior to that had a decent chance of closing…i’m sure it takes a little time for all the banks to tighten their standards AND enforce them. People are still working off of commissions, so they are going to try and get those 100% NINJA loans through the pipe especially if they know that changes are coming down the road. So I bet that there was a conscious effort by all parties involved in closing, to dot their “eyes” and cross their “tees” as early as possible.
I know Piggs have a tendency to say “just wait, you’ll see” but I think that the numbers reported in early October will be much more telling of the real impact of the credit crunch. Don’t you agree?
RockemsockParticipantOn Monday there was a slight breeze, but I can see the flags from our home down the hill, and they are ALWAYS blowing…so yeah, I bet it get’s real windy on occasion. 3 of the models and the a handful of homes below it will have the spectacular view…no way it’s worth that price for me, but if they can get someone to pay that…more power to ’em. I’m all for the integrated sound system, but I just can’t believe that the only spot they could find in the ~5000 sq. ft. to house all the equipment, was in the master closet.
Recordsclerk hit the nail on the head with the description…these homes are definitely the best non-custom homes i’ve been in. Although I would have liked to have seen at least one single story plan in the mix, because I almost always like the floorplans of the single story homes the best. We mentioned to the realtor at the location that our favorite was the Michelangelo and she said that was everyone’s favorite…kinda’ surprising that out of 6 models there was a stand-out favorite.
August 16, 2007 at 3:12 PM in reply to: Can we have bigger font on the site ? Or maybe add the option to adjust the font ? #76603RockemsockParticipantI hear ya pepsi…and I agree that this site style isn’t a top choice of mine, but the content keeps me coming back. The style does fit the artwork and theme that Rich has chosen…and it comes across as being unique among the dozens of Bubble Bloggers on the web.
August 16, 2007 at 3:12 PM in reply to: Can we have bigger font on the site ? Or maybe add the option to adjust the font ? #76724RockemsockParticipantI hear ya pepsi…and I agree that this site style isn’t a top choice of mine, but the content keeps me coming back. The style does fit the artwork and theme that Rich has chosen…and it comes across as being unique among the dozens of Bubble Bloggers on the web.
August 16, 2007 at 3:12 PM in reply to: Can we have bigger font on the site ? Or maybe add the option to adjust the font ? #76752RockemsockParticipantI hear ya pepsi…and I agree that this site style isn’t a top choice of mine, but the content keeps me coming back. The style does fit the artwork and theme that Rich has chosen…and it comes across as being unique among the dozens of Bubble Bloggers on the web.
RockemsockParticipantRockemsockParticipantRockemsockParticipant -
AuthorPosts