Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM in reply to: When does it make financial sense to just dump your house??? #484752
Ricechex
ParticipantRt66: To be fair, I have read sdrealtor and Russell’s posts over the years, and have found them to be well balanced without the hype. SDrealtor has a full time job as an Engineer, so I think he is not so desperate to make a dollar to sacrifice his integrity and reputation.
To the OP: As the sole breadwinner of the family, I am hoping that your wife would be grateful for her good fortune and your committment. A bigger house will not happiness make. It is all just stuff. When you go to your grave, will your eulogy consist of what a great house you had? Or what kind of person you were?
November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM in reply to: When does it make financial sense to just dump your house??? #484921ParticipantRt66: To be fair, I have read sdrealtor and Russell’s posts over the years, and have found them to be well balanced without the hype. SDrealtor has a full time job as an Engineer, so I think he is not so desperate to make a dollar to sacrifice his integrity and reputation.
To the OP: As the sole breadwinner of the family, I am hoping that your wife would be grateful for her good fortune and your committment. A bigger house will not happiness make. It is all just stuff. When you go to your grave, will your eulogy consist of what a great house you had? Or what kind of person you were?
November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM in reply to: When does it make financial sense to just dump your house??? #485293ParticipantRt66: To be fair, I have read sdrealtor and Russell’s posts over the years, and have found them to be well balanced without the hype. SDrealtor has a full time job as an Engineer, so I think he is not so desperate to make a dollar to sacrifice his integrity and reputation.
To the OP: As the sole breadwinner of the family, I am hoping that your wife would be grateful for her good fortune and your committment. A bigger house will not happiness make. It is all just stuff. When you go to your grave, will your eulogy consist of what a great house you had? Or what kind of person you were?
November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM in reply to: When does it make financial sense to just dump your house??? #485378ParticipantRt66: To be fair, I have read sdrealtor and Russell’s posts over the years, and have found them to be well balanced without the hype. SDrealtor has a full time job as an Engineer, so I think he is not so desperate to make a dollar to sacrifice his integrity and reputation.
To the OP: As the sole breadwinner of the family, I am hoping that your wife would be grateful for her good fortune and your committment. A bigger house will not happiness make. It is all just stuff. When you go to your grave, will your eulogy consist of what a great house you had? Or what kind of person you were?
November 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM in reply to: When does it make financial sense to just dump your house??? #485609ParticipantRt66: To be fair, I have read sdrealtor and Russell’s posts over the years, and have found them to be well balanced without the hype. SDrealtor has a full time job as an Engineer, so I think he is not so desperate to make a dollar to sacrifice his integrity and reputation.
To the OP: As the sole breadwinner of the family, I am hoping that your wife would be grateful for her good fortune and your committment. A bigger house will not happiness make. It is all just stuff. When you go to your grave, will your eulogy consist of what a great house you had? Or what kind of person you were?
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM in reply to: House crams healthcare bill down the countries throat. #480852ParticipantHealth insurance needs to be REGULATED, rather than entire “reform.” What is the point of creating a new program? Fix what we have.
The “public option” will increase revenues for private parties, and we will pay for it. Here is my take on how it will play out:
Government will outsource the “public option” to private company of its choice. Usually, the lowest bidder or a “known” party, such as Halliburton/KBR.
If it is a “fee for service” contract, then the company will employ as little laborers/medical professionals as possible, because the company owners are in it for profit. Thus, if the job calls for 10 M.D.s, only 6 will actually be employed. Of those 6, 5 will be interns, new to the field, and/or stormy and unstable job history. Why? Because the company wants profit, so people of these backgrounds will take a low salary.
The management positions will be government, and those chosen will have little knowledge about medical care and few qualifications, other than to respond to the higher ranking government employees trying to build their empire.
Medical treatment decisions will be decided by a “committee” of people that know little about health care. If any of you are government employees, I correlate this to NSPS “pay pool” and their mission will be to deny care.
As far as the folks getting booted from insurance due to disability, pre-existing conditions, they will take the “public option” for care. Thus, “Halliburton/KBR” will demand more money from the government/taxpayers to pay for long term and or chronic illnesses. However, that will be small potatoes compared with amount of disenfranchised people receiving benefits. That is going to cost us big.
This is just another entitlement program, disguised as “helping everyone”. This is creation of another monster that will spiral out of control. Politicians will herald its success.
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM in reply to: House crams healthcare bill down the countries throat. #481018ParticipantHealth insurance needs to be REGULATED, rather than entire “reform.” What is the point of creating a new program? Fix what we have.
The “public option” will increase revenues for private parties, and we will pay for it. Here is my take on how it will play out:
Government will outsource the “public option” to private company of its choice. Usually, the lowest bidder or a “known” party, such as Halliburton/KBR.
If it is a “fee for service” contract, then the company will employ as little laborers/medical professionals as possible, because the company owners are in it for profit. Thus, if the job calls for 10 M.D.s, only 6 will actually be employed. Of those 6, 5 will be interns, new to the field, and/or stormy and unstable job history. Why? Because the company wants profit, so people of these backgrounds will take a low salary.
The management positions will be government, and those chosen will have little knowledge about medical care and few qualifications, other than to respond to the higher ranking government employees trying to build their empire.
Medical treatment decisions will be decided by a “committee” of people that know little about health care. If any of you are government employees, I correlate this to NSPS “pay pool” and their mission will be to deny care.
As far as the folks getting booted from insurance due to disability, pre-existing conditions, they will take the “public option” for care. Thus, “Halliburton/KBR” will demand more money from the government/taxpayers to pay for long term and or chronic illnesses. However, that will be small potatoes compared with amount of disenfranchised people receiving benefits. That is going to cost us big.
This is just another entitlement program, disguised as “helping everyone”. This is creation of another monster that will spiral out of control. Politicians will herald its success.
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM in reply to: House crams healthcare bill down the countries throat. #481383ParticipantHealth insurance needs to be REGULATED, rather than entire “reform.” What is the point of creating a new program? Fix what we have.
The “public option” will increase revenues for private parties, and we will pay for it. Here is my take on how it will play out:
Government will outsource the “public option” to private company of its choice. Usually, the lowest bidder or a “known” party, such as Halliburton/KBR.
If it is a “fee for service” contract, then the company will employ as little laborers/medical professionals as possible, because the company owners are in it for profit. Thus, if the job calls for 10 M.D.s, only 6 will actually be employed. Of those 6, 5 will be interns, new to the field, and/or stormy and unstable job history. Why? Because the company wants profit, so people of these backgrounds will take a low salary.
The management positions will be government, and those chosen will have little knowledge about medical care and few qualifications, other than to respond to the higher ranking government employees trying to build their empire.
Medical treatment decisions will be decided by a “committee” of people that know little about health care. If any of you are government employees, I correlate this to NSPS “pay pool” and their mission will be to deny care.
As far as the folks getting booted from insurance due to disability, pre-existing conditions, they will take the “public option” for care. Thus, “Halliburton/KBR” will demand more money from the government/taxpayers to pay for long term and or chronic illnesses. However, that will be small potatoes compared with amount of disenfranchised people receiving benefits. That is going to cost us big.
This is just another entitlement program, disguised as “helping everyone”. This is creation of another monster that will spiral out of control. Politicians will herald its success.
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM in reply to: House crams healthcare bill down the countries throat. #481464ParticipantHealth insurance needs to be REGULATED, rather than entire “reform.” What is the point of creating a new program? Fix what we have.
The “public option” will increase revenues for private parties, and we will pay for it. Here is my take on how it will play out:
Government will outsource the “public option” to private company of its choice. Usually, the lowest bidder or a “known” party, such as Halliburton/KBR.
If it is a “fee for service” contract, then the company will employ as little laborers/medical professionals as possible, because the company owners are in it for profit. Thus, if the job calls for 10 M.D.s, only 6 will actually be employed. Of those 6, 5 will be interns, new to the field, and/or stormy and unstable job history. Why? Because the company wants profit, so people of these backgrounds will take a low salary.
The management positions will be government, and those chosen will have little knowledge about medical care and few qualifications, other than to respond to the higher ranking government employees trying to build their empire.
Medical treatment decisions will be decided by a “committee” of people that know little about health care. If any of you are government employees, I correlate this to NSPS “pay pool” and their mission will be to deny care.
As far as the folks getting booted from insurance due to disability, pre-existing conditions, they will take the “public option” for care. Thus, “Halliburton/KBR” will demand more money from the government/taxpayers to pay for long term and or chronic illnesses. However, that will be small potatoes compared with amount of disenfranchised people receiving benefits. That is going to cost us big.
This is just another entitlement program, disguised as “helping everyone”. This is creation of another monster that will spiral out of control. Politicians will herald its success.
November 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM in reply to: House crams healthcare bill down the countries throat. #481683ParticipantHealth insurance needs to be REGULATED, rather than entire “reform.” What is the point of creating a new program? Fix what we have.
The “public option” will increase revenues for private parties, and we will pay for it. Here is my take on how it will play out:
Government will outsource the “public option” to private company of its choice. Usually, the lowest bidder or a “known” party, such as Halliburton/KBR.
If it is a “fee for service” contract, then the company will employ as little laborers/medical professionals as possible, because the company owners are in it for profit. Thus, if the job calls for 10 M.D.s, only 6 will actually be employed. Of those 6, 5 will be interns, new to the field, and/or stormy and unstable job history. Why? Because the company wants profit, so people of these backgrounds will take a low salary.
The management positions will be government, and those chosen will have little knowledge about medical care and few qualifications, other than to respond to the higher ranking government employees trying to build their empire.
Medical treatment decisions will be decided by a “committee” of people that know little about health care. If any of you are government employees, I correlate this to NSPS “pay pool” and their mission will be to deny care.
As far as the folks getting booted from insurance due to disability, pre-existing conditions, they will take the “public option” for care. Thus, “Halliburton/KBR” will demand more money from the government/taxpayers to pay for long term and or chronic illnesses. However, that will be small potatoes compared with amount of disenfranchised people receiving benefits. That is going to cost us big.
This is just another entitlement program, disguised as “helping everyone”. This is creation of another monster that will spiral out of control. Politicians will herald its success.
ParticipantTG: You are hilarious as usual!
I agree with the addendums to the lease. I have a tenant (3+ years) and her friends keep telling her to move to a better neighborhood. She states that she has no plans for this because she knows lots of people getting their rent raised, and getting booted due to short sale and foreclosure. She states she would rather be renting in a stable situation (we also take care of the property) then move and deal with the unknown.
ParticipantTG: You are hilarious as usual!
I agree with the addendums to the lease. I have a tenant (3+ years) and her friends keep telling her to move to a better neighborhood. She states that she has no plans for this because she knows lots of people getting their rent raised, and getting booted due to short sale and foreclosure. She states she would rather be renting in a stable situation (we also take care of the property) then move and deal with the unknown.
ParticipantTG: You are hilarious as usual!
I agree with the addendums to the lease. I have a tenant (3+ years) and her friends keep telling her to move to a better neighborhood. She states that she has no plans for this because she knows lots of people getting their rent raised, and getting booted due to short sale and foreclosure. She states she would rather be renting in a stable situation (we also take care of the property) then move and deal with the unknown.
ParticipantTG: You are hilarious as usual!
I agree with the addendums to the lease. I have a tenant (3+ years) and her friends keep telling her to move to a better neighborhood. She states that she has no plans for this because she knows lots of people getting their rent raised, and getting booted due to short sale and foreclosure. She states she would rather be renting in a stable situation (we also take care of the property) then move and deal with the unknown.
-
AuthorPosts
