Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Ricechex
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=briansd1]Congratulations for driving stick. Few women can drive stick.[/quote]
I am calling BS on this generalization… I hardly know anybody who doesn’t drive stick.
Glad you are ok JP.
Rich[/quote]
Concur. I didn’t like it when I read it.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=briansd1]Congratulations for driving stick. Few women can drive stick.[/quote]
I am calling BS on this generalization… I hardly know anybody who doesn’t drive stick.
Glad you are ok JP.
Rich[/quote]
Concur. I didn’t like it when I read it.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=briansd1]Congratulations for driving stick. Few women can drive stick.[/quote]
I am calling BS on this generalization… I hardly know anybody who doesn’t drive stick.
Glad you are ok JP.
Rich[/quote]
Concur. I didn’t like it when I read it.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=briansd1]Congratulations for driving stick. Few women can drive stick.[/quote]
I am calling BS on this generalization… I hardly know anybody who doesn’t drive stick.
Glad you are ok JP.
Rich[/quote]
Concur. I didn’t like it when I read it.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=briansd1]Congratulations for driving stick. Few women can drive stick.[/quote]
I am calling BS on this generalization… I hardly know anybody who doesn’t drive stick.
Glad you are ok JP.
Rich[/quote]
Concur. I didn’t like it when I read it.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=briansd1]flu, that $1 billion non-cash charge that AT&T is taking does not cost them anything right now. It’s actually an advantage because it’s saving them immediately $350 million in taxes (assume 35% tax rate).
It’s like depreciation on a rental property. You take a depreciation write-off to reduce your income this year. It’s not costing you any cash.
Sure, in the future you have to spend money to maintain your property, but immediately, that depreciation deduction has no real economic impact.[/quote]
Oh, Brian what are we to do with you? Living with rose colored glasses.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=briansd1]flu, that $1 billion non-cash charge that AT&T is taking does not cost them anything right now. It’s actually an advantage because it’s saving them immediately $350 million in taxes (assume 35% tax rate).
It’s like depreciation on a rental property. You take a depreciation write-off to reduce your income this year. It’s not costing you any cash.
Sure, in the future you have to spend money to maintain your property, but immediately, that depreciation deduction has no real economic impact.[/quote]
Oh, Brian what are we to do with you? Living with rose colored glasses.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=briansd1]flu, that $1 billion non-cash charge that AT&T is taking does not cost them anything right now. It’s actually an advantage because it’s saving them immediately $350 million in taxes (assume 35% tax rate).
It’s like depreciation on a rental property. You take a depreciation write-off to reduce your income this year. It’s not costing you any cash.
Sure, in the future you have to spend money to maintain your property, but immediately, that depreciation deduction has no real economic impact.[/quote]
Oh, Brian what are we to do with you? Living with rose colored glasses.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=briansd1]flu, that $1 billion non-cash charge that AT&T is taking does not cost them anything right now. It’s actually an advantage because it’s saving them immediately $350 million in taxes (assume 35% tax rate).
It’s like depreciation on a rental property. You take a depreciation write-off to reduce your income this year. It’s not costing you any cash.
Sure, in the future you have to spend money to maintain your property, but immediately, that depreciation deduction has no real economic impact.[/quote]
Oh, Brian what are we to do with you? Living with rose colored glasses.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=briansd1]flu, that $1 billion non-cash charge that AT&T is taking does not cost them anything right now. It’s actually an advantage because it’s saving them immediately $350 million in taxes (assume 35% tax rate).
It’s like depreciation on a rental property. You take a depreciation write-off to reduce your income this year. It’s not costing you any cash.
Sure, in the future you have to spend money to maintain your property, but immediately, that depreciation deduction has no real economic impact.[/quote]
Oh, Brian what are we to do with you? Living with rose colored glasses.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=taz]James Howard Kunstler has been writing about this for years…the “Long Emergency”…[/quote]
I read him too. He has a weekly blog, new entries on Mondays. Here is the link for anyone that is interested.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=taz]James Howard Kunstler has been writing about this for years…the “Long Emergency”…[/quote]
I read him too. He has a weekly blog, new entries on Mondays. Here is the link for anyone that is interested.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=taz]James Howard Kunstler has been writing about this for years…the “Long Emergency”…[/quote]
I read him too. He has a weekly blog, new entries on Mondays. Here is the link for anyone that is interested.
Ricechex
Participant[quote=taz]James Howard Kunstler has been writing about this for years…the “Long Emergency”…[/quote]
I read him too. He has a weekly blog, new entries on Mondays. Here is the link for anyone that is interested.
-
AuthorPosts
