Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
RenParticipant
That will yield about $100-200/month in profit = $1200-2400/year. That’s 6-12% profit from the $20k invested from the very first year. That sounds pretty decent to me considering rent will most likely go up over time, which will increase your ROI. The question is, can it really fetch $1800/month in rent?
And $1200-$2400 profit assumes you’ve got it rented 12 months/year. I think vacancies and maintenance are likely to wipe that profit out completely in the long term.
RenParticipantOil at any price meant from the middle east. I thought that was pretty obvious.
I gave you a chance to dispute it factualy but all you could do is take sentences out of context. I knew that you had no facts.
“It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program—declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.”
My facts were dead on. Maybe he meant the middle east – if so, he should have specified that. As it is, it’s just an inflammatory comment meant to rile up the right and scare the left. One out of two isn’t bad, I guess.
Don’t get me wrong, I agree with a lot of what’s said. I also think he’s going about it all wrong.
Farmington is the guy that is distributing the information, not the original author.
Nope. Farmington may have written an introduction to the editorial, but who knows when that was added. It was not in the original document. See below. It’s being distributed mostly via e-mail, by far-right conservatives with too much time on their hands.
I found the orginial source. Apparently the typos and misspacing were because the guy who pasted it to the forum I found it it tried to remove the record spacers.
No, you didn’t find the original source. This might be the original source, but who knows:
http://www.go-patriots.com/Jim%20Cash.htmPretty lame that you didn’t recognize that. Hey, this personal attack thing is fun. Keep ’em coming.
Enjoy yourself out there today as you take joy in others misery.
I had a great time wallowing in their misery, thanks! Seeing all those “bank owned” signs was like Christmas π
RenParticipantOil at any price meant from the middle east. I thought that was pretty obvious.
I gave you a chance to dispute it factualy but all you could do is take sentences out of context. I knew that you had no facts.
“It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program—declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.”
My facts were dead on. Maybe he meant the middle east – if so, he should have specified that. As it is, it’s just an inflammatory comment meant to rile up the right and scare the left. One out of two isn’t bad, I guess.
Don’t get me wrong, I agree with a lot of what’s said. I also think he’s going about it all wrong.
Farmington is the guy that is distributing the information, not the original author.
Nope. Farmington may have written an introduction to the editorial, but who knows when that was added. It was not in the original document. See below. It’s being distributed mostly via e-mail, by far-right conservatives with too much time on their hands.
I found the orginial source. Apparently the typos and misspacing were because the guy who pasted it to the forum I found it it tried to remove the record spacers.
No, you didn’t find the original source. This might be the original source, but who knows:
http://www.go-patriots.com/Jim%20Cash.htmPretty lame that you didn’t recognize that. Hey, this personal attack thing is fun. Keep ’em coming.
Enjoy yourself out there today as you take joy in others misery.
I had a great time wallowing in their misery, thanks! Seeing all those “bank owned” signs was like Christmas π
RenParticipantOil at any price meant from the middle east. I thought that was pretty obvious.
I gave you a chance to dispute it factualy but all you could do is take sentences out of context. I knew that you had no facts.
“It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program—declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.”
My facts were dead on. Maybe he meant the middle east – if so, he should have specified that. As it is, it’s just an inflammatory comment meant to rile up the right and scare the left. One out of two isn’t bad, I guess.
Don’t get me wrong, I agree with a lot of what’s said. I also think he’s going about it all wrong.
Farmington is the guy that is distributing the information, not the original author.
Nope. Farmington may have written an introduction to the editorial, but who knows when that was added. It was not in the original document. See below. It’s being distributed mostly via e-mail, by far-right conservatives with too much time on their hands.
I found the orginial source. Apparently the typos and misspacing were because the guy who pasted it to the forum I found it it tried to remove the record spacers.
No, you didn’t find the original source. This might be the original source, but who knows:
http://www.go-patriots.com/Jim%20Cash.htmPretty lame that you didn’t recognize that. Hey, this personal attack thing is fun. Keep ’em coming.
Enjoy yourself out there today as you take joy in others misery.
I had a great time wallowing in their misery, thanks! Seeing all those “bank owned” signs was like Christmas π
RenParticipantOil at any price meant from the middle east. I thought that was pretty obvious.
I gave you a chance to dispute it factualy but all you could do is take sentences out of context. I knew that you had no facts.
“It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program—declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.”
My facts were dead on. Maybe he meant the middle east – if so, he should have specified that. As it is, it’s just an inflammatory comment meant to rile up the right and scare the left. One out of two isn’t bad, I guess.
Don’t get me wrong, I agree with a lot of what’s said. I also think he’s going about it all wrong.
Farmington is the guy that is distributing the information, not the original author.
Nope. Farmington may have written an introduction to the editorial, but who knows when that was added. It was not in the original document. See below. It’s being distributed mostly via e-mail, by far-right conservatives with too much time on their hands.
I found the orginial source. Apparently the typos and misspacing were because the guy who pasted it to the forum I found it it tried to remove the record spacers.
No, you didn’t find the original source. This might be the original source, but who knows:
http://www.go-patriots.com/Jim%20Cash.htmPretty lame that you didn’t recognize that. Hey, this personal attack thing is fun. Keep ’em coming.
Enjoy yourself out there today as you take joy in others misery.
I had a great time wallowing in their misery, thanks! Seeing all those “bank owned” signs was like Christmas π
RenParticipantOil at any price meant from the middle east. I thought that was pretty obvious.
I gave you a chance to dispute it factualy but all you could do is take sentences out of context. I knew that you had no facts.
“It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program—declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.”
My facts were dead on. Maybe he meant the middle east – if so, he should have specified that. As it is, it’s just an inflammatory comment meant to rile up the right and scare the left. One out of two isn’t bad, I guess.
Don’t get me wrong, I agree with a lot of what’s said. I also think he’s going about it all wrong.
Farmington is the guy that is distributing the information, not the original author.
Nope. Farmington may have written an introduction to the editorial, but who knows when that was added. It was not in the original document. See below. It’s being distributed mostly via e-mail, by far-right conservatives with too much time on their hands.
I found the orginial source. Apparently the typos and misspacing were because the guy who pasted it to the forum I found it it tried to remove the record spacers.
No, you didn’t find the original source. This might be the original source, but who knows:
http://www.go-patriots.com/Jim%20Cash.htmPretty lame that you didn’t recognize that. Hey, this personal attack thing is fun. Keep ’em coming.
Enjoy yourself out there today as you take joy in others misery.
I had a great time wallowing in their misery, thanks! Seeing all those “bank owned” signs was like Christmas π
RenParticipantLOL, so a text written by a man in his 70’s with typo’s that doesn’t agree with your world view is not to be taken seriously??
Why would a retired general named Farmington go through so much trouble to put out something that is a fraud?? Why would he risk his reputation by pulling what would be a schoolboy prank?
First of all, the text was supposedly written by a Gen Cash, not Gen Farrington. Farrington (again, supposedly) wrote the introduction. Changes like this happen when something gets mass e-mailed, slightly changed, then e-mailed again. That’s mostly where you’ll find this document – pasted on blogs after people get it via e-mail.
The letter has the feel of something written by some bored far-right neo-nazi social misfit, taking a break from writing his manifesto and cleaning his assault rifle – not a retired general. Now I know why… after doing a little more research, it looks like the e-mail was from an editorial which has Gen Cash’s name on it. The grammatical errors were added, along with emphasis on certain words, because our bored social misfit, genius that he is, never learned how to copy and paste. He apparently took Cash’s original document, retyped it, and then started spamming people.
Which facts are in error and please give us the documentation that disputes them.
Even assuming Cash wrote it, I still have some problems with the content. For example – “Oil will not be available to this country at any price.”
Yeah, because the mid-east is the only region on Earth with oil. Last I heard, Canada was our number one supplier of oil. Venezuela and Mexico are number 3 and 4 on the list, after Saudi Arabia.
You can also count me as yet another person (registered non-partisan) who voted for Bush, now regrets that vote, and considers him to be a complete moron.
Feel free to escalate the personal attacks, if you like, and/or forward the spam letter to all your friends. Me, I’m going out to look at houses π
RenParticipantLOL, so a text written by a man in his 70’s with typo’s that doesn’t agree with your world view is not to be taken seriously??
Why would a retired general named Farmington go through so much trouble to put out something that is a fraud?? Why would he risk his reputation by pulling what would be a schoolboy prank?
First of all, the text was supposedly written by a Gen Cash, not Gen Farrington. Farrington (again, supposedly) wrote the introduction. Changes like this happen when something gets mass e-mailed, slightly changed, then e-mailed again. That’s mostly where you’ll find this document – pasted on blogs after people get it via e-mail.
The letter has the feel of something written by some bored far-right neo-nazi social misfit, taking a break from writing his manifesto and cleaning his assault rifle – not a retired general. Now I know why… after doing a little more research, it looks like the e-mail was from an editorial which has Gen Cash’s name on it. The grammatical errors were added, along with emphasis on certain words, because our bored social misfit, genius that he is, never learned how to copy and paste. He apparently took Cash’s original document, retyped it, and then started spamming people.
Which facts are in error and please give us the documentation that disputes them.
Even assuming Cash wrote it, I still have some problems with the content. For example – “Oil will not be available to this country at any price.”
Yeah, because the mid-east is the only region on Earth with oil. Last I heard, Canada was our number one supplier of oil. Venezuela and Mexico are number 3 and 4 on the list, after Saudi Arabia.
You can also count me as yet another person (registered non-partisan) who voted for Bush, now regrets that vote, and considers him to be a complete moron.
Feel free to escalate the personal attacks, if you like, and/or forward the spam letter to all your friends. Me, I’m going out to look at houses π
RenParticipantLOL, so a text written by a man in his 70’s with typo’s that doesn’t agree with your world view is not to be taken seriously??
Why would a retired general named Farmington go through so much trouble to put out something that is a fraud?? Why would he risk his reputation by pulling what would be a schoolboy prank?
First of all, the text was supposedly written by a Gen Cash, not Gen Farrington. Farrington (again, supposedly) wrote the introduction. Changes like this happen when something gets mass e-mailed, slightly changed, then e-mailed again. That’s mostly where you’ll find this document – pasted on blogs after people get it via e-mail.
The letter has the feel of something written by some bored far-right neo-nazi social misfit, taking a break from writing his manifesto and cleaning his assault rifle – not a retired general. Now I know why… after doing a little more research, it looks like the e-mail was from an editorial which has Gen Cash’s name on it. The grammatical errors were added, along with emphasis on certain words, because our bored social misfit, genius that he is, never learned how to copy and paste. He apparently took Cash’s original document, retyped it, and then started spamming people.
Which facts are in error and please give us the documentation that disputes them.
Even assuming Cash wrote it, I still have some problems with the content. For example – “Oil will not be available to this country at any price.”
Yeah, because the mid-east is the only region on Earth with oil. Last I heard, Canada was our number one supplier of oil. Venezuela and Mexico are number 3 and 4 on the list, after Saudi Arabia.
You can also count me as yet another person (registered non-partisan) who voted for Bush, now regrets that vote, and considers him to be a complete moron.
Feel free to escalate the personal attacks, if you like, and/or forward the spam letter to all your friends. Me, I’m going out to look at houses π
RenParticipantLOL, so a text written by a man in his 70’s with typo’s that doesn’t agree with your world view is not to be taken seriously??
Why would a retired general named Farmington go through so much trouble to put out something that is a fraud?? Why would he risk his reputation by pulling what would be a schoolboy prank?
First of all, the text was supposedly written by a Gen Cash, not Gen Farrington. Farrington (again, supposedly) wrote the introduction. Changes like this happen when something gets mass e-mailed, slightly changed, then e-mailed again. That’s mostly where you’ll find this document – pasted on blogs after people get it via e-mail.
The letter has the feel of something written by some bored far-right neo-nazi social misfit, taking a break from writing his manifesto and cleaning his assault rifle – not a retired general. Now I know why… after doing a little more research, it looks like the e-mail was from an editorial which has Gen Cash’s name on it. The grammatical errors were added, along with emphasis on certain words, because our bored social misfit, genius that he is, never learned how to copy and paste. He apparently took Cash’s original document, retyped it, and then started spamming people.
Which facts are in error and please give us the documentation that disputes them.
Even assuming Cash wrote it, I still have some problems with the content. For example – “Oil will not be available to this country at any price.”
Yeah, because the mid-east is the only region on Earth with oil. Last I heard, Canada was our number one supplier of oil. Venezuela and Mexico are number 3 and 4 on the list, after Saudi Arabia.
You can also count me as yet another person (registered non-partisan) who voted for Bush, now regrets that vote, and considers him to be a complete moron.
Feel free to escalate the personal attacks, if you like, and/or forward the spam letter to all your friends. Me, I’m going out to look at houses π
RenParticipantLOL, so a text written by a man in his 70’s with typo’s that doesn’t agree with your world view is not to be taken seriously??
Why would a retired general named Farmington go through so much trouble to put out something that is a fraud?? Why would he risk his reputation by pulling what would be a schoolboy prank?
First of all, the text was supposedly written by a Gen Cash, not Gen Farrington. Farrington (again, supposedly) wrote the introduction. Changes like this happen when something gets mass e-mailed, slightly changed, then e-mailed again. That’s mostly where you’ll find this document – pasted on blogs after people get it via e-mail.
The letter has the feel of something written by some bored far-right neo-nazi social misfit, taking a break from writing his manifesto and cleaning his assault rifle – not a retired general. Now I know why… after doing a little more research, it looks like the e-mail was from an editorial which has Gen Cash’s name on it. The grammatical errors were added, along with emphasis on certain words, because our bored social misfit, genius that he is, never learned how to copy and paste. He apparently took Cash’s original document, retyped it, and then started spamming people.
Which facts are in error and please give us the documentation that disputes them.
Even assuming Cash wrote it, I still have some problems with the content. For example – “Oil will not be available to this country at any price.”
Yeah, because the mid-east is the only region on Earth with oil. Last I heard, Canada was our number one supplier of oil. Venezuela and Mexico are number 3 and 4 on the list, after Saudi Arabia.
You can also count me as yet another person (registered non-partisan) who voted for Bush, now regrets that vote, and considers him to be a complete moron.
Feel free to escalate the personal attacks, if you like, and/or forward the spam letter to all your friends. Me, I’m going out to look at houses π
RenParticipant“Middle East Imperative”
That letter just screams “Internet chain e-mail hoax”. There are way too many grammatical and factual errors in it.
Don’t take it seriously.
RenParticipant“Middle East Imperative”
That letter just screams “Internet chain e-mail hoax”. There are way too many grammatical and factual errors in it.
Don’t take it seriously.
RenParticipant“Middle East Imperative”
That letter just screams “Internet chain e-mail hoax”. There are way too many grammatical and factual errors in it.
Don’t take it seriously.
-
AuthorPosts