Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
RenParticipant
[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]
…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.
RenParticipant[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]
…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.
RenParticipant[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]
…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.
RenParticipant[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]
…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.
RenParticipantChristians are mostly harmless these days, dangerous only in the sense that some denominations keep a large portion of the population ignorant (there’s a reason Jehovah’s Witnesses are strongly discouraged from attending college), but that will never stop our progress as a species. For the most part, the smarter people (the ones that matter) eventually come to their senses. Most of these organizations are also slowly but surely changing in the face of the inexorable march of science, because the alternative is to cease to exist. For example, the Christians I know realize that evolution is reality, they no longer believe in the existence of Hell, and their leaders now look at it as more of a mental state than a physical place. They still have a long way to go, though.
I do laugh at the modern branding that has sprung up in the last few years (e.g., “NOTW”, and even better, “TRUTH – Soul Armor”) – desperate and failing attempts to make Christianity look cool and elite. It’s wildly undignified and embarrassing.
RenParticipantChristians are mostly harmless these days, dangerous only in the sense that some denominations keep a large portion of the population ignorant (there’s a reason Jehovah’s Witnesses are strongly discouraged from attending college), but that will never stop our progress as a species. For the most part, the smarter people (the ones that matter) eventually come to their senses. Most of these organizations are also slowly but surely changing in the face of the inexorable march of science, because the alternative is to cease to exist. For example, the Christians I know realize that evolution is reality, they no longer believe in the existence of Hell, and their leaders now look at it as more of a mental state than a physical place. They still have a long way to go, though.
I do laugh at the modern branding that has sprung up in the last few years (e.g., “NOTW”, and even better, “TRUTH – Soul Armor”) – desperate and failing attempts to make Christianity look cool and elite. It’s wildly undignified and embarrassing.
RenParticipantChristians are mostly harmless these days, dangerous only in the sense that some denominations keep a large portion of the population ignorant (there’s a reason Jehovah’s Witnesses are strongly discouraged from attending college), but that will never stop our progress as a species. For the most part, the smarter people (the ones that matter) eventually come to their senses. Most of these organizations are also slowly but surely changing in the face of the inexorable march of science, because the alternative is to cease to exist. For example, the Christians I know realize that evolution is reality, they no longer believe in the existence of Hell, and their leaders now look at it as more of a mental state than a physical place. They still have a long way to go, though.
I do laugh at the modern branding that has sprung up in the last few years (e.g., “NOTW”, and even better, “TRUTH – Soul Armor”) – desperate and failing attempts to make Christianity look cool and elite. It’s wildly undignified and embarrassing.
RenParticipantChristians are mostly harmless these days, dangerous only in the sense that some denominations keep a large portion of the population ignorant (there’s a reason Jehovah’s Witnesses are strongly discouraged from attending college), but that will never stop our progress as a species. For the most part, the smarter people (the ones that matter) eventually come to their senses. Most of these organizations are also slowly but surely changing in the face of the inexorable march of science, because the alternative is to cease to exist. For example, the Christians I know realize that evolution is reality, they no longer believe in the existence of Hell, and their leaders now look at it as more of a mental state than a physical place. They still have a long way to go, though.
I do laugh at the modern branding that has sprung up in the last few years (e.g., “NOTW”, and even better, “TRUTH – Soul Armor”) – desperate and failing attempts to make Christianity look cool and elite. It’s wildly undignified and embarrassing.
RenParticipantChristians are mostly harmless these days, dangerous only in the sense that some denominations keep a large portion of the population ignorant (there’s a reason Jehovah’s Witnesses are strongly discouraged from attending college), but that will never stop our progress as a species. For the most part, the smarter people (the ones that matter) eventually come to their senses. Most of these organizations are also slowly but surely changing in the face of the inexorable march of science, because the alternative is to cease to exist. For example, the Christians I know realize that evolution is reality, they no longer believe in the existence of Hell, and their leaders now look at it as more of a mental state than a physical place. They still have a long way to go, though.
I do laugh at the modern branding that has sprung up in the last few years (e.g., “NOTW”, and even better, “TRUTH – Soul Armor”) – desperate and failing attempts to make Christianity look cool and elite. It’s wildly undignified and embarrassing.
RenParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
RenParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
RenParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
RenParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
RenParticipant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
-
AuthorPosts