Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Raybyrnes
ParticipantSeems like your long term rate of borrowing is higher than short term borrowing. WOuld be logical to put more money down and find some tease equity lines to do the remodel. Probably could find 1% for 6 months and prime minus a point thereafter.
As income come in you can pay down the equity line as a hedge against rising interest rates.ParticipantSeems like your long term rate of borrowing is higher than short term borrowing. WOuld be logical to put more money down and find some tease equity lines to do the remodel. Probably could find 1% for 6 months and prime minus a point thereafter.
As income come in you can pay down the equity line as a hedge against rising interest rates.ParticipantSeems like your long term rate of borrowing is higher than short term borrowing. WOuld be logical to put more money down and find some tease equity lines to do the remodel. Probably could find 1% for 6 months and prime minus a point thereafter.
As income come in you can pay down the equity line as a hedge against rising interest rates.ParticipantSeems like your long term rate of borrowing is higher than short term borrowing. WOuld be logical to put more money down and find some tease equity lines to do the remodel. Probably could find 1% for 6 months and prime minus a point thereafter.
As income come in you can pay down the equity line as a hedge against rising interest rates.ParticipantStandard Deviations still have to begin with some point. We need to accept some sort of starting point for a conversation Even your example of a 740 credit score could be questioned. Is that Experian, Equifax, or Transunion or are you using a merged credit score? Do you need to qualify that statement?
ParticipantStandard Deviations still have to begin with some point. We need to accept some sort of starting point for a conversation Even your example of a 740 credit score could be questioned. Is that Experian, Equifax, or Transunion or are you using a merged credit score? Do you need to qualify that statement?
ParticipantStandard Deviations still have to begin with some point. We need to accept some sort of starting point for a conversation Even your example of a 740 credit score could be questioned. Is that Experian, Equifax, or Transunion or are you using a merged credit score? Do you need to qualify that statement?
ParticipantStandard Deviations still have to begin with some point. We need to accept some sort of starting point for a conversation Even your example of a 740 credit score could be questioned. Is that Experian, Equifax, or Transunion or are you using a merged credit score? Do you need to qualify that statement?
ParticipantStandard Deviations still have to begin with some point. We need to accept some sort of starting point for a conversation Even your example of a 740 credit score could be questioned. Is that Experian, Equifax, or Transunion or are you using a merged credit score? Do you need to qualify that statement?
ParticipantHLS
That article is from the Wall street Journal. There is nothing misleading about it. It says the average rates. If you are a 20% down 720+ person you can expect to do better. If not you may do worse.
I wouldn’t go around throwing every article out there under the water. You begin to lose credibility at that point. JMTC
ParticipantHLS
That article is from the Wall street Journal. There is nothing misleading about it. It says the average rates. If you are a 20% down 720+ person you can expect to do better. If not you may do worse.
I wouldn’t go around throwing every article out there under the water. You begin to lose credibility at that point. JMTC
ParticipantHLS
That article is from the Wall street Journal. There is nothing misleading about it. It says the average rates. If you are a 20% down 720+ person you can expect to do better. If not you may do worse.
I wouldn’t go around throwing every article out there under the water. You begin to lose credibility at that point. JMTC
ParticipantHLS
That article is from the Wall street Journal. There is nothing misleading about it. It says the average rates. If you are a 20% down 720+ person you can expect to do better. If not you may do worse.
I wouldn’t go around throwing every article out there under the water. You begin to lose credibility at that point. JMTC
ParticipantHLS
That article is from the Wall street Journal. There is nothing misleading about it. It says the average rates. If you are a 20% down 720+ person you can expect to do better. If not you may do worse.
I wouldn’t go around throwing every article out there under the water. You begin to lose credibility at that point. JMTC
-
AuthorPosts
