Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Raybyrnes
Participantrocket science
“Next we will not want to take responsibility for pouring hot coffee in our laps and blame the seller of said coffee for making it hot.”Little off topic but I felt you might wnat to educate yourself before throwing out this statement. I assume you are referrign to Stellaa Stubeck from the McDonalds case.
McDonalds had over 1000 compliants about the coffee being excessively hot . There were other burn victims who ahd taken Mcdonalds to court and McDonalds had won the cases. Stella’s attorney had beaten McDonalds on one of the cases and offered to settle for around 20K . McDonalds refused to settle.
McDonalds had also recieved numerous requests from the Shriners in regards to the dangerous temperature of their coffee. They dismissed the complaints.
When McDonalds was ultimately found negligent the victim earned money for paind and suffereing and McDonalds had to pay punitive damages. The punitive damage equated to less than 1 day of coffee sales.
Additioanlly the dmaages were capped so the award was bogus.
Stella stuback suffered disfoming and permanent damage to her vaginal area becaese McDonalds negligence, After all the legal fees and negotiation she earned less than a couple hundred thousands.
Just thought you might want tto know the truth of the McDonalds myth.
Participantrocket science
“Next we will not want to take responsibility for pouring hot coffee in our laps and blame the seller of said coffee for making it hot.”Little off topic but I felt you might wnat to educate yourself before throwing out this statement. I assume you are referrign to Stellaa Stubeck from the McDonalds case.
McDonalds had over 1000 compliants about the coffee being excessively hot . There were other burn victims who ahd taken Mcdonalds to court and McDonalds had won the cases. Stella’s attorney had beaten McDonalds on one of the cases and offered to settle for around 20K . McDonalds refused to settle.
McDonalds had also recieved numerous requests from the Shriners in regards to the dangerous temperature of their coffee. They dismissed the complaints.
When McDonalds was ultimately found negligent the victim earned money for paind and suffereing and McDonalds had to pay punitive damages. The punitive damage equated to less than 1 day of coffee sales.
Additioanlly the dmaages were capped so the award was bogus.
Stella stuback suffered disfoming and permanent damage to her vaginal area becaese McDonalds negligence, After all the legal fees and negotiation she earned less than a couple hundred thousands.
Just thought you might want tto know the truth of the McDonalds myth.
Participantrocket science
“Next we will not want to take responsibility for pouring hot coffee in our laps and blame the seller of said coffee for making it hot.”Little off topic but I felt you might wnat to educate yourself before throwing out this statement. I assume you are referrign to Stellaa Stubeck from the McDonalds case.
McDonalds had over 1000 compliants about the coffee being excessively hot . There were other burn victims who ahd taken Mcdonalds to court and McDonalds had won the cases. Stella’s attorney had beaten McDonalds on one of the cases and offered to settle for around 20K . McDonalds refused to settle.
McDonalds had also recieved numerous requests from the Shriners in regards to the dangerous temperature of their coffee. They dismissed the complaints.
When McDonalds was ultimately found negligent the victim earned money for paind and suffereing and McDonalds had to pay punitive damages. The punitive damage equated to less than 1 day of coffee sales.
Additioanlly the dmaages were capped so the award was bogus.
Stella stuback suffered disfoming and permanent damage to her vaginal area becaese McDonalds negligence, After all the legal fees and negotiation she earned less than a couple hundred thousands.
Just thought you might want tto know the truth of the McDonalds myth.
Participantrocket science
“Next we will not want to take responsibility for pouring hot coffee in our laps and blame the seller of said coffee for making it hot.”Little off topic but I felt you might wnat to educate yourself before throwing out this statement. I assume you are referrign to Stellaa Stubeck from the McDonalds case.
McDonalds had over 1000 compliants about the coffee being excessively hot . There were other burn victims who ahd taken Mcdonalds to court and McDonalds had won the cases. Stella’s attorney had beaten McDonalds on one of the cases and offered to settle for around 20K . McDonalds refused to settle.
McDonalds had also recieved numerous requests from the Shriners in regards to the dangerous temperature of their coffee. They dismissed the complaints.
When McDonalds was ultimately found negligent the victim earned money for paind and suffereing and McDonalds had to pay punitive damages. The punitive damage equated to less than 1 day of coffee sales.
Additioanlly the dmaages were capped so the award was bogus.
Stella stuback suffered disfoming and permanent damage to her vaginal area becaese McDonalds negligence, After all the legal fees and negotiation she earned less than a couple hundred thousands.
Just thought you might want tto know the truth of the McDonalds myth.
Participantpabloesqobar
I looked at these program when I was a grad student and thought it wass very opportunistic because my income had dipped significantly to the point that I could qualify during that period of time that I was in school but would rise dramitically once I was out of school.
I believe the program is tied to your income only at the time of qualification. If you become a millionaire the day after you move in because you hit lotto, it has no bearing on you eligibility.
The downside to this program is you need to live in the home for 40 years before you can outright own it.
Secondly, it stipulates that you can not own the property as a rental.
Third you are not eligible to sell the property at a market rate if selling before the end of that 40 year period.
Lastly you need to find a qualified applicant who does not have too little in assets adn income or too much.
Mulberry in the Bressi ranch area was a similiar income conmtingent project with subordinate financing from the city of Carlsbad.
Not a bad deal for a family that is getting started.
Participantpabloesqobar
I looked at these program when I was a grad student and thought it wass very opportunistic because my income had dipped significantly to the point that I could qualify during that period of time that I was in school but would rise dramitically once I was out of school.
I believe the program is tied to your income only at the time of qualification. If you become a millionaire the day after you move in because you hit lotto, it has no bearing on you eligibility.
The downside to this program is you need to live in the home for 40 years before you can outright own it.
Secondly, it stipulates that you can not own the property as a rental.
Third you are not eligible to sell the property at a market rate if selling before the end of that 40 year period.
Lastly you need to find a qualified applicant who does not have too little in assets adn income or too much.
Mulberry in the Bressi ranch area was a similiar income conmtingent project with subordinate financing from the city of Carlsbad.
Not a bad deal for a family that is getting started.
Participantpabloesqobar
I looked at these program when I was a grad student and thought it wass very opportunistic because my income had dipped significantly to the point that I could qualify during that period of time that I was in school but would rise dramitically once I was out of school.
I believe the program is tied to your income only at the time of qualification. If you become a millionaire the day after you move in because you hit lotto, it has no bearing on you eligibility.
The downside to this program is you need to live in the home for 40 years before you can outright own it.
Secondly, it stipulates that you can not own the property as a rental.
Third you are not eligible to sell the property at a market rate if selling before the end of that 40 year period.
Lastly you need to find a qualified applicant who does not have too little in assets adn income or too much.
Mulberry in the Bressi ranch area was a similiar income conmtingent project with subordinate financing from the city of Carlsbad.
Not a bad deal for a family that is getting started.
Participantpabloesqobar
I looked at these program when I was a grad student and thought it wass very opportunistic because my income had dipped significantly to the point that I could qualify during that period of time that I was in school but would rise dramitically once I was out of school.
I believe the program is tied to your income only at the time of qualification. If you become a millionaire the day after you move in because you hit lotto, it has no bearing on you eligibility.
The downside to this program is you need to live in the home for 40 years before you can outright own it.
Secondly, it stipulates that you can not own the property as a rental.
Third you are not eligible to sell the property at a market rate if selling before the end of that 40 year period.
Lastly you need to find a qualified applicant who does not have too little in assets adn income or too much.
Mulberry in the Bressi ranch area was a similiar income conmtingent project with subordinate financing from the city of Carlsbad.
Not a bad deal for a family that is getting started.
Participantpabloesqobar
I looked at these program when I was a grad student and thought it wass very opportunistic because my income had dipped significantly to the point that I could qualify during that period of time that I was in school but would rise dramitically once I was out of school.
I believe the program is tied to your income only at the time of qualification. If you become a millionaire the day after you move in because you hit lotto, it has no bearing on you eligibility.
The downside to this program is you need to live in the home for 40 years before you can outright own it.
Secondly, it stipulates that you can not own the property as a rental.
Third you are not eligible to sell the property at a market rate if selling before the end of that 40 year period.
Lastly you need to find a qualified applicant who does not have too little in assets adn income or too much.
Mulberry in the Bressi ranch area was a similiar income conmtingent project with subordinate financing from the city of Carlsbad.
Not a bad deal for a family that is getting started.
ParticipantBetter off with a CHAFA loan and you can combine this with the CHDAP program. (California Housing Finance Authority) California Downpayment assistance program.
Make use of your California Tax dollars.
ParticipantBetter off with a CHAFA loan and you can combine this with the CHDAP program. (California Housing Finance Authority) California Downpayment assistance program.
Make use of your California Tax dollars.
ParticipantBetter off with a CHAFA loan and you can combine this with the CHDAP program. (California Housing Finance Authority) California Downpayment assistance program.
Make use of your California Tax dollars.
ParticipantBetter off with a CHAFA loan and you can combine this with the CHDAP program. (California Housing Finance Authority) California Downpayment assistance program.
Make use of your California Tax dollars.
ParticipantBetter off with a CHAFA loan and you can combine this with the CHDAP program. (California Housing Finance Authority) California Downpayment assistance program.
Make use of your California Tax dollars.
-
AuthorPosts
