[Raybyrnes]

“Looks like the peak year for violent crime and murder was in 1991 (assuming this chart is any good).”

Funny the author of Freakonimcs traces part of this reduced crime rates and reduction of violent back to Roe v Wade. As those potential would be criminals would be coming of age they are now gone. Not making any argument for abortion but it was an interesting point.

The same argument of too much information can be seen in sports. How would Babe ruth or Micky mantele been percieved in todays modern age of information.

[Raybyrnes]

“Looks like the peak year for violent crime and murder was in 1991 (assuming this chart is any good).”

Funny the author of Freakonimcs traces part of this reduced crime rates and reduction of violent back to Roe v Wade. As those potential would be criminals would be coming of age they are now gone. Not making any argument for abortion but it was an interesting point.

The same argument of too much information can be seen in sports. How would Babe ruth or Micky mantele been percieved in todays modern age of information.

[Raybyrnes]

“Looks like the peak year for violent crime and murder was in 1991 (assuming this chart is any good).”

Funny the author of Freakonimcs traces part of this reduced crime rates and reduction of violent back to Roe v Wade. As those potential would be criminals would be coming of age they are now gone. Not making any argument for abortion but it was an interesting point.

The same argument of too much information can be seen in sports. How would Babe ruth or Micky mantele been percieved in todays modern age of information.

[Raybyrnes]

“Looks like the peak year for violent crime and murder was in 1991 (assuming this chart is any good).”

Funny the author of Freakonimcs traces part of this reduced crime rates and reduction of violent back to Roe v Wade. As those potential would be criminals would be coming of age they are now gone. Not making any argument for abortion but it was an interesting point.

The same argument of too much information can be seen in sports. How would Babe ruth or Micky mantele been percieved in todays modern age of information.

[Raybyrnes]

“Looks like the peak year for violent crime and murder was in 1991 (assuming this chart is any good).”

Funny the author of Freakonimcs traces part of this reduced crime rates and reduction of violent back to Roe v Wade. As those potential would be criminals would be coming of age they are now gone. Not making any argument for abortion but it was an interesting point.

The same argument of too much information can be seen in sports. How would Babe ruth or Micky mantele been percieved in todays modern age of information.

[Raybyrnes]

Marion.

Your a loooser. Stop with your ridiculous argument. You made the same in another thread and it was equally as ridiculous. The bank can hold the landlord responsible for what he owes to them. That is for the bank to take up with your landlord. As long as he is providing shelter which is his agreement with you you are responsible for paying your rent or you can elect to move out. Stop with you nonsense.

[Raybyrnes]

Marion.

Your a loooser. Stop with your ridiculous argument. You made the same in another thread and it was equally as ridiculous. The bank can hold the landlord responsible for what he owes to them. That is for the bank to take up with your landlord. As long as he is providing shelter which is his agreement with you you are responsible for paying your rent or you can elect to move out. Stop with you nonsense.

[Raybyrnes]

Marion.

Your a loooser. Stop with your ridiculous argument. You made the same in another thread and it was equally as ridiculous. The bank can hold the landlord responsible for what he owes to them. That is for the bank to take up with your landlord. As long as he is providing shelter which is his agreement with you you are responsible for paying your rent or you can elect to move out. Stop with you nonsense.

[Raybyrnes]

Marion.

Your a loooser. Stop with your ridiculous argument. You made the same in another thread and it was equally as ridiculous. The bank can hold the landlord responsible for what he owes to them. That is for the bank to take up with your landlord. As long as he is providing shelter which is his agreement with you you are responsible for paying your rent or you can elect to move out. Stop with you nonsense.

[Raybyrnes]

Marion.

Your a loooser. Stop with your ridiculous argument. You made the same in another thread and it was equally as ridiculous. The bank can hold the landlord responsible for what he owes to them. That is for the bank to take up with your landlord. As long as he is providing shelter which is his agreement with you you are responsible for paying your rent or you can elect to move out. Stop with you nonsense.

[Raybyrnes]

marion
Nope Marion. What he does money is not your concern. Your contract with him is to provide shelter. He has met his duties to you as long as you are allowed to live under that roof. You are absurd and an absolute idiot not to realize this. If he loses his place prior to the end of your lease agreement then he should have an obligation to assist with your moving expenses at that point.

[Raybyrnes]

marion
Nope Marion. What he does money is not your concern. Your contract with him is to provide shelter. He has met his duties to you as long as you are allowed to live under that roof. You are absurd and an absolute idiot not to realize this. If he loses his place prior to the end of your lease agreement then he should have an obligation to assist with your moving expenses at that point.

[Raybyrnes]

marion
Nope Marion. What he does money is not your concern. Your contract with him is to provide shelter. He has met his duties to you as long as you are allowed to live under that roof. You are absurd and an absolute idiot not to realize this. If he loses his place prior to the end of your lease agreement then he should have an obligation to assist with your moving expenses at that point.

[Raybyrnes]

marion
Nope Marion. What he does money is not your concern. Your contract with him is to provide shelter. He has met his duties to you as long as you are allowed to live under that roof. You are absurd and an absolute idiot not to realize this. If he loses his place prior to the end of your lease agreement then he should have an obligation to assist with your moving expenses at that point.

[Raybyrnes]

marion
Nope Marion. What he does money is not your concern. Your contract with him is to provide shelter. He has met his duties to you as long as you are allowed to live under that roof. You are absurd and an absolute idiot not to realize this. If he loses his place prior to the end of your lease agreement then he should have an obligation to assist with your moving expenses at that point.

[Author]

Posts