Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Portlock
ParticipantThe way this is written, the realtor is a used car salesperson, willing to say anything to get the sale – but how can she be blamed? She is trying to get as much money as possible out of the sale as instructed by her client – heck, she also gets a take of the final figure – so the more $$$ the better. The moment she agrees the market has not doubled in 5 years is the moment she justifies a price reduction, so no way is she going to admit that – I would be surprised if she did.
This is why I’m reluctant to deal with most realtors. Even if I become well versed in home buying to avoid being taken, an equally well or most likely better versed buying or selling agent will be getting a share of my money whether their information is true or not, withheld or exposed.
Buyer beware, in vain.
ParticipantThe way this is written, the realtor is a used car salesperson, willing to say anything to get the sale – but how can she be blamed? She is trying to get as much money as possible out of the sale as instructed by her client – heck, she also gets a take of the final figure – so the more $$$ the better. The moment she agrees the market has not doubled in 5 years is the moment she justifies a price reduction, so no way is she going to admit that – I would be surprised if she did.
This is why I’m reluctant to deal with most realtors. Even if I become well versed in home buying to avoid being taken, an equally well or most likely better versed buying or selling agent will be getting a share of my money whether their information is true or not, withheld or exposed.
Buyer beware, in vain.
ParticipantThe way this is written, the realtor is a used car salesperson, willing to say anything to get the sale – but how can she be blamed? She is trying to get as much money as possible out of the sale as instructed by her client – heck, she also gets a take of the final figure – so the more $$$ the better. The moment she agrees the market has not doubled in 5 years is the moment she justifies a price reduction, so no way is she going to admit that – I would be surprised if she did.
This is why I’m reluctant to deal with most realtors. Even if I become well versed in home buying to avoid being taken, an equally well or most likely better versed buying or selling agent will be getting a share of my money whether their information is true or not, withheld or exposed.
Buyer beware, in vain.
ParticipantThe way this is written, the realtor is a used car salesperson, willing to say anything to get the sale – but how can she be blamed? She is trying to get as much money as possible out of the sale as instructed by her client – heck, she also gets a take of the final figure – so the more $$$ the better. The moment she agrees the market has not doubled in 5 years is the moment she justifies a price reduction, so no way is she going to admit that – I would be surprised if she did.
This is why I’m reluctant to deal with most realtors. Even if I become well versed in home buying to avoid being taken, an equally well or most likely better versed buying or selling agent will be getting a share of my money whether their information is true or not, withheld or exposed.
Buyer beware, in vain.
ParticipantHow about a sub-set ‘OT:Politics’ forum? Or would that tangent too much from the purpose of this site?
ParticipantHow about a sub-set ‘OT:Politics’ forum? Or would that tangent too much from the purpose of this site?
ParticipantHow about a sub-set ‘OT:Politics’ forum? Or would that tangent too much from the purpose of this site?
ParticipantHow about a sub-set ‘OT:Politics’ forum? Or would that tangent too much from the purpose of this site?
ParticipantHow about a sub-set ‘OT:Politics’ forum? Or would that tangent too much from the purpose of this site?
July 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM in reply to: Democrats intent on destroying middle class with $11 gas #233223ParticipantIn combinatorial game theory, a game is partisan or partizan if it is not impartial. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other.
Most games are partisan; for example in chess, only one player can move the white pieces.
Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than impartial games, as the Sprague-Grundy theorem does not apply. However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of numbers as games to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.
July 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM in reply to: Democrats intent on destroying middle class with $11 gas #233350ParticipantIn combinatorial game theory, a game is partisan or partizan if it is not impartial. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other.
Most games are partisan; for example in chess, only one player can move the white pieces.
Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than impartial games, as the Sprague-Grundy theorem does not apply. However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of numbers as games to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.
July 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM in reply to: Democrats intent on destroying middle class with $11 gas #233359ParticipantIn combinatorial game theory, a game is partisan or partizan if it is not impartial. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other.
Most games are partisan; for example in chess, only one player can move the white pieces.
Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than impartial games, as the Sprague-Grundy theorem does not apply. However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of numbers as games to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.
July 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM in reply to: Democrats intent on destroying middle class with $11 gas #233402ParticipantIn combinatorial game theory, a game is partisan or partizan if it is not impartial. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other.
Most games are partisan; for example in chess, only one player can move the white pieces.
Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than impartial games, as the Sprague-Grundy theorem does not apply. However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of numbers as games to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.
July 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM in reply to: Democrats intent on destroying middle class with $11 gas #233412ParticipantIn combinatorial game theory, a game is partisan or partizan if it is not impartial. That is, some moves are available to one player and not to the other.
Most games are partisan; for example in chess, only one player can move the white pieces.
Partisan games are more difficult to analyze than impartial games, as the Sprague-Grundy theorem does not apply. However, the application of combinatorial game theory to partisan games allows the significance of numbers as games to be seen, in a way that is not possible with impartial games.
-
AuthorPosts
