Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
pencilneck
ParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
pencilneck
ParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
pencilneck
ParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM in reply to: Boil and bubble, double the trouble! Commercial RE #154177pencilneck
ParticipantOn a national level, I’ve seen compelling evidence that commercial real estate construction spending trails residential real estate spending by about 3 years.
Commercial real estate is probably headed for the same cliff.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM in reply to: Boil and bubble, double the trouble! Commercial RE #154451pencilneck
ParticipantOn a national level, I’ve seen compelling evidence that commercial real estate construction spending trails residential real estate spending by about 3 years.
Commercial real estate is probably headed for the same cliff.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM in reply to: Boil and bubble, double the trouble! Commercial RE #154464pencilneck
ParticipantOn a national level, I’ve seen compelling evidence that commercial real estate construction spending trails residential real estate spending by about 3 years.
Commercial real estate is probably headed for the same cliff.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM in reply to: Boil and bubble, double the trouble! Commercial RE #154475pencilneck
ParticipantOn a national level, I’ve seen compelling evidence that commercial real estate construction spending trails residential real estate spending by about 3 years.
Commercial real estate is probably headed for the same cliff.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM in reply to: Boil and bubble, double the trouble! Commercial RE #154553pencilneck
ParticipantOn a national level, I’ve seen compelling evidence that commercial real estate construction spending trails residential real estate spending by about 3 years.
Commercial real estate is probably headed for the same cliff.
pencilneck
ParticipantThis probably isn’t free money, since this stimulus package sounds a lot like the one Bush did earlier in his presidency. These “tax rebates” only appear to be early tax refunds on the following year’s taxes.
If thats the case these rebates are just short term, interest free loans.
(This is what the original poster said as well-but its a good point. This isn’t free money and yes, you could give it to charity. But do you normally borrow money to give to charity?)
pencilneck
ParticipantThis probably isn’t free money, since this stimulus package sounds a lot like the one Bush did earlier in his presidency. These “tax rebates” only appear to be early tax refunds on the following year’s taxes.
If thats the case these rebates are just short term, interest free loans.
(This is what the original poster said as well-but its a good point. This isn’t free money and yes, you could give it to charity. But do you normally borrow money to give to charity?)
pencilneck
ParticipantThis probably isn’t free money, since this stimulus package sounds a lot like the one Bush did earlier in his presidency. These “tax rebates” only appear to be early tax refunds on the following year’s taxes.
If thats the case these rebates are just short term, interest free loans.
(This is what the original poster said as well-but its a good point. This isn’t free money and yes, you could give it to charity. But do you normally borrow money to give to charity?)
pencilneck
ParticipantThis probably isn’t free money, since this stimulus package sounds a lot like the one Bush did earlier in his presidency. These “tax rebates” only appear to be early tax refunds on the following year’s taxes.
If thats the case these rebates are just short term, interest free loans.
(This is what the original poster said as well-but its a good point. This isn’t free money and yes, you could give it to charity. But do you normally borrow money to give to charity?)
pencilneck
ParticipantThis probably isn’t free money, since this stimulus package sounds a lot like the one Bush did earlier in his presidency. These “tax rebates” only appear to be early tax refunds on the following year’s taxes.
If thats the case these rebates are just short term, interest free loans.
(This is what the original poster said as well-but its a good point. This isn’t free money and yes, you could give it to charity. But do you normally borrow money to give to charity?)
pencilneck
Participantthe National Association of Realtors is fun:
http://www.realtor.org/press_room/index.htmlI almost posted this link by mistake:
http://www.nar.org/(edit: and neither links are blogs. My bad)
-
AuthorPosts
