Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientrenter
ParticipantDon’t be so unsympathetic, snail. I am sure there are countries where an unlimited number of children is considered a good thing. This woman and her family should be flown to that country, first class.
ParticipantDon’t be so unsympathetic, snail. I am sure there are countries where an unlimited number of children is considered a good thing. This woman and her family should be flown to that country, first class.
ParticipantDon’t be so unsympathetic, snail. I am sure there are countries where an unlimited number of children is considered a good thing. This woman and her family should be flown to that country, first class.
ParticipantAgree with DataAgent
ParticipantAgree with DataAgent
ParticipantAgree with DataAgent
ParticipantAgree with DataAgent
ParticipantAgree with DataAgent
Participantchrisp, you should expect that there will be some skepticism about the wisdom of paying a very high price for a home, almost exclusively paid for using other people’s money. Almost all the money you are paying comes from your fellow taxpayers, via guarantees and implicit bailout promises from an arm of the federal govt.
In other words, you are paying $60,000 for your new home. The rest of the money is coming from people like me and other pigg bloggers. If you become a default in 3 years because the price you set for your home is way too high, then you will not be paying. I will. Hence the somewhat tetchy reaction to your proposal to set the price for your new home at a VERY, VERY large sum of money. I earn about half a million a year pre-tax, and my home budget is$300K. Are you stretching your price a little? Or getting taxpayers to stretch for you?
I hope this helps you to understand the reactions you’re seeing.
Participantchrisp, you should expect that there will be some skepticism about the wisdom of paying a very high price for a home, almost exclusively paid for using other people’s money. Almost all the money you are paying comes from your fellow taxpayers, via guarantees and implicit bailout promises from an arm of the federal govt.
In other words, you are paying $60,000 for your new home. The rest of the money is coming from people like me and other pigg bloggers. If you become a default in 3 years because the price you set for your home is way too high, then you will not be paying. I will. Hence the somewhat tetchy reaction to your proposal to set the price for your new home at a VERY, VERY large sum of money. I earn about half a million a year pre-tax, and my home budget is$300K. Are you stretching your price a little? Or getting taxpayers to stretch for you?
I hope this helps you to understand the reactions you’re seeing.
Participantchrisp, you should expect that there will be some skepticism about the wisdom of paying a very high price for a home, almost exclusively paid for using other people’s money. Almost all the money you are paying comes from your fellow taxpayers, via guarantees and implicit bailout promises from an arm of the federal govt.
In other words, you are paying $60,000 for your new home. The rest of the money is coming from people like me and other pigg bloggers. If you become a default in 3 years because the price you set for your home is way too high, then you will not be paying. I will. Hence the somewhat tetchy reaction to your proposal to set the price for your new home at a VERY, VERY large sum of money. I earn about half a million a year pre-tax, and my home budget is$300K. Are you stretching your price a little? Or getting taxpayers to stretch for you?
I hope this helps you to understand the reactions you’re seeing.
Participantchrisp, you should expect that there will be some skepticism about the wisdom of paying a very high price for a home, almost exclusively paid for using other people’s money. Almost all the money you are paying comes from your fellow taxpayers, via guarantees and implicit bailout promises from an arm of the federal govt.
In other words, you are paying $60,000 for your new home. The rest of the money is coming from people like me and other pigg bloggers. If you become a default in 3 years because the price you set for your home is way too high, then you will not be paying. I will. Hence the somewhat tetchy reaction to your proposal to set the price for your new home at a VERY, VERY large sum of money. I earn about half a million a year pre-tax, and my home budget is$300K. Are you stretching your price a little? Or getting taxpayers to stretch for you?
I hope this helps you to understand the reactions you’re seeing.
Participantchrisp, you should expect that there will be some skepticism about the wisdom of paying a very high price for a home, almost exclusively paid for using other people’s money. Almost all the money you are paying comes from your fellow taxpayers, via guarantees and implicit bailout promises from an arm of the federal govt.
In other words, you are paying $60,000 for your new home. The rest of the money is coming from people like me and other pigg bloggers. If you become a default in 3 years because the price you set for your home is way too high, then you will not be paying. I will. Hence the somewhat tetchy reaction to your proposal to set the price for your new home at a VERY, VERY large sum of money. I earn about half a million a year pre-tax, and my home budget is$300K. Are you stretching your price a little? Or getting taxpayers to stretch for you?
I hope this helps you to understand the reactions you’re seeing.
ParticipantGood prediction, sdr.
As long as the govt pumps unlimited amounts of money into housing, house prices will continue to levitate well above free market levels, with ups and downs occurring as the spigots are artifically opened more or less. Predicting the housing market now relies more on predicting govt intervention in our economy than understanding market fundamentals (meaning market behavior in the absence of concerted govt intervention in one direction or another).
-
AuthorPosts
