Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientrenter
Participant[quote=BadSquirrel]….It’s not about respect, it’s about market realities.[/quote]
If the market reality is that the 3% is too high, and they try to push it on you anyway, then they really don’t respect you.
Participant[quote=BadSquirrel]….It’s not about respect, it’s about market realities.[/quote]
If the market reality is that the 3% is too high, and they try to push it on you anyway, then they really don’t respect you.
Participant[quote=BadSquirrel]….It’s not about respect, it’s about market realities.[/quote]
If the market reality is that the 3% is too high, and they try to push it on you anyway, then they really don’t respect you.
ParticipantWell the latest CPI-U (for October) is 1% higher than it was 2 years earlier (October 2008). So their increase is 3 times the rate of inflation.
I’d say that is too high for a good tenant in the current economic environment. If they push that on you anyway, they don’t respect you, or reality.
ParticipantWell the latest CPI-U (for October) is 1% higher than it was 2 years earlier (October 2008). So their increase is 3 times the rate of inflation.
I’d say that is too high for a good tenant in the current economic environment. If they push that on you anyway, they don’t respect you, or reality.
ParticipantWell the latest CPI-U (for October) is 1% higher than it was 2 years earlier (October 2008). So their increase is 3 times the rate of inflation.
I’d say that is too high for a good tenant in the current economic environment. If they push that on you anyway, they don’t respect you, or reality.
ParticipantWell the latest CPI-U (for October) is 1% higher than it was 2 years earlier (October 2008). So their increase is 3 times the rate of inflation.
I’d say that is too high for a good tenant in the current economic environment. If they push that on you anyway, they don’t respect you, or reality.
ParticipantWell the latest CPI-U (for October) is 1% higher than it was 2 years earlier (October 2008). So their increase is 3 times the rate of inflation.
I’d say that is too high for a good tenant in the current economic environment. If they push that on you anyway, they don’t respect you, or reality.
Participant[quote=CA renter] …..various bailouts and programs that were meant to keep asset prices artificially inflated (not really what most would call a “liberal” cause).
Mind you, I think we needed to spend some public money, mostly to keep people fed and clothed — unemployment insurance was reasonable, IMHO — but the financial/housing/mortgage sector has sucked up trillions of dollars.[/quote]
Spot-on, on all points. And the desire to avoid fundamental restructuring that would make our economy healthier in the long term is completely bipartisan.
Participant[quote=CA renter] …..various bailouts and programs that were meant to keep asset prices artificially inflated (not really what most would call a “liberal” cause).
Mind you, I think we needed to spend some public money, mostly to keep people fed and clothed — unemployment insurance was reasonable, IMHO — but the financial/housing/mortgage sector has sucked up trillions of dollars.[/quote]
Spot-on, on all points. And the desire to avoid fundamental restructuring that would make our economy healthier in the long term is completely bipartisan.
Participant[quote=CA renter] …..various bailouts and programs that were meant to keep asset prices artificially inflated (not really what most would call a “liberal” cause).
Mind you, I think we needed to spend some public money, mostly to keep people fed and clothed — unemployment insurance was reasonable, IMHO — but the financial/housing/mortgage sector has sucked up trillions of dollars.[/quote]
Spot-on, on all points. And the desire to avoid fundamental restructuring that would make our economy healthier in the long term is completely bipartisan.
Participant[quote=CA renter] …..various bailouts and programs that were meant to keep asset prices artificially inflated (not really what most would call a “liberal” cause).
Mind you, I think we needed to spend some public money, mostly to keep people fed and clothed — unemployment insurance was reasonable, IMHO — but the financial/housing/mortgage sector has sucked up trillions of dollars.[/quote]
Spot-on, on all points. And the desire to avoid fundamental restructuring that would make our economy healthier in the long term is completely bipartisan.
Participant[quote=CA renter] …..various bailouts and programs that were meant to keep asset prices artificially inflated (not really what most would call a “liberal” cause).
Mind you, I think we needed to spend some public money, mostly to keep people fed and clothed — unemployment insurance was reasonable, IMHO — but the financial/housing/mortgage sector has sucked up trillions of dollars.[/quote]
Spot-on, on all points. And the desire to avoid fundamental restructuring that would make our economy healthier in the long term is completely bipartisan.
ParticipantDoes this mean you can go back to being who you really are – scaredycat?
-
AuthorPosts
