Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 11, 2008 at 4:37 PM in reply to: Lehman Bailout this Weekend (Bear Stearns replay) #269424
patb
ParticipantHow about a profit sharing program,
if 12% of the profits went to the workforce, maybe they’d
actually be with the program.And as far as i can tell the management offer is pretty poor.
11% increase over three years plus COLA, given how piss poor
CPI is, i can see why they are striking.patb
ParticipantHow about a profit sharing program,
if 12% of the profits went to the workforce, maybe they’d
actually be with the program.And as far as i can tell the management offer is pretty poor.
11% increase over three years plus COLA, given how piss poor
CPI is, i can see why they are striking.patb
ParticipantHow about a profit sharing program,
if 12% of the profits went to the workforce, maybe they’d
actually be with the program.And as far as i can tell the management offer is pretty poor.
11% increase over three years plus COLA, given how piss poor
CPI is, i can see why they are striking.patb
ParticipantHow about a profit sharing program,
if 12% of the profits went to the workforce, maybe they’d
actually be with the program.And as far as i can tell the management offer is pretty poor.
11% increase over three years plus COLA, given how piss poor
CPI is, i can see why they are striking.patb
ParticipantHow about a profit sharing program,
if 12% of the profits went to the workforce, maybe they’d
actually be with the program.And as far as i can tell the management offer is pretty poor.
11% increase over three years plus COLA, given how piss poor
CPI is, i can see why they are striking.patb
Participantcommon is probably a buck but not much more.
patb
Participantcommon is probably a buck but not much more.
patb
Participantcommon is probably a buck but not much more.
patb
Participantcommon is probably a buck but not much more.
patb
Participantcommon is probably a buck but not much more.
patb
ParticipantCost per SF tends to drop as the fixed costs get spread over a larger
base, but, Price per SF tends to increase as more hiigher end
finish is applied.a small 1960’s house of 1200 SF, would have carpet or tile floors,
and plaster walls.a 2005 mcmansion will have spotted owl mosaic and giant crown molds.
at leas tthe corrleation is bigger house higer $/SF on price.
through about 1500 SF, then it starts to rise again on the small end.patb
ParticipantCost per SF tends to drop as the fixed costs get spread over a larger
base, but, Price per SF tends to increase as more hiigher end
finish is applied.a small 1960’s house of 1200 SF, would have carpet or tile floors,
and plaster walls.a 2005 mcmansion will have spotted owl mosaic and giant crown molds.
at leas tthe corrleation is bigger house higer $/SF on price.
through about 1500 SF, then it starts to rise again on the small end.patb
ParticipantCost per SF tends to drop as the fixed costs get spread over a larger
base, but, Price per SF tends to increase as more hiigher end
finish is applied.a small 1960’s house of 1200 SF, would have carpet or tile floors,
and plaster walls.a 2005 mcmansion will have spotted owl mosaic and giant crown molds.
at leas tthe corrleation is bigger house higer $/SF on price.
through about 1500 SF, then it starts to rise again on the small end.patb
ParticipantCost per SF tends to drop as the fixed costs get spread over a larger
base, but, Price per SF tends to increase as more hiigher end
finish is applied.a small 1960’s house of 1200 SF, would have carpet or tile floors,
and plaster walls.a 2005 mcmansion will have spotted owl mosaic and giant crown molds.
at leas tthe corrleation is bigger house higer $/SF on price.
through about 1500 SF, then it starts to rise again on the small end. -
AuthorPosts
