Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
paramount
ParticipantFor those of you concerned about housing if a depression really kicks in, the Gov’t has you covered under HR 645 (January 22, 2009), a summary from the gov’t web site (govtrack.us):
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Don’t worry, you’ll get fed and they even have medical care for their guests, wow this is great. I’ll rest much better now…
paramount
ParticipantFor those of you concerned about housing if a depression really kicks in, the Gov’t has you covered under HR 645 (January 22, 2009), a summary from the gov’t web site (govtrack.us):
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Don’t worry, you’ll get fed and they even have medical care for their guests, wow this is great. I’ll rest much better now…
paramount
ParticipantFor those of you concerned about housing if a depression really kicks in, the Gov’t has you covered under HR 645 (January 22, 2009), a summary from the gov’t web site (govtrack.us):
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Don’t worry, you’ll get fed and they even have medical care for their guests, wow this is great. I’ll rest much better now…
paramount
ParticipantFor those of you concerned about housing if a depression really kicks in, the Gov’t has you covered under HR 645 (January 22, 2009), a summary from the gov’t web site (govtrack.us):
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Don’t worry, you’ll get fed and they even have medical care for their guests, wow this is great. I’ll rest much better now…
paramount
ParticipantFor those of you concerned about housing if a depression really kicks in, the Gov’t has you covered under HR 645 (January 22, 2009), a summary from the gov’t web site (govtrack.us):
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Don’t worry, you’ll get fed and they even have medical care for their guests, wow this is great. I’ll rest much better now…
paramount
ParticipantI’ll tell you what’s happening: the Scabs over at FedEx are putting UPS out of business.
paramount
ParticipantI’ll tell you what’s happening: the Scabs over at FedEx are putting UPS out of business.
paramount
ParticipantI’ll tell you what’s happening: the Scabs over at FedEx are putting UPS out of business.
paramount
ParticipantI’ll tell you what’s happening: the Scabs over at FedEx are putting UPS out of business.
paramount
ParticipantI’ll tell you what’s happening: the Scabs over at FedEx are putting UPS out of business.
January 27, 2009 at 10:54 PM in reply to: RUMOR: Buying another house while you currently own one… #337452paramount
ParticipantI asked Wells Fargo Mortgage about this 30% rule and I was told it was not a requirement.
Maybe that rule is for Fannie Mae backed loans only.
The larger problem is renting out your current house – there are already an inordinate amount of scoundrels in California without a bad economy.
In a bad economy, the likelihood of getting screwed by a tenant is very high IMO.
For most, buying a 2nd home will lead to financial disaster.
January 27, 2009 at 10:54 PM in reply to: RUMOR: Buying another house while you currently own one… #337783paramount
ParticipantI asked Wells Fargo Mortgage about this 30% rule and I was told it was not a requirement.
Maybe that rule is for Fannie Mae backed loans only.
The larger problem is renting out your current house – there are already an inordinate amount of scoundrels in California without a bad economy.
In a bad economy, the likelihood of getting screwed by a tenant is very high IMO.
For most, buying a 2nd home will lead to financial disaster.
January 27, 2009 at 10:54 PM in reply to: RUMOR: Buying another house while you currently own one… #337874paramount
ParticipantI asked Wells Fargo Mortgage about this 30% rule and I was told it was not a requirement.
Maybe that rule is for Fannie Mae backed loans only.
The larger problem is renting out your current house – there are already an inordinate amount of scoundrels in California without a bad economy.
In a bad economy, the likelihood of getting screwed by a tenant is very high IMO.
For most, buying a 2nd home will lead to financial disaster.
January 27, 2009 at 10:54 PM in reply to: RUMOR: Buying another house while you currently own one… #337900paramount
ParticipantI asked Wells Fargo Mortgage about this 30% rule and I was told it was not a requirement.
Maybe that rule is for Fannie Mae backed loans only.
The larger problem is renting out your current house – there are already an inordinate amount of scoundrels in California without a bad economy.
In a bad economy, the likelihood of getting screwed by a tenant is very high IMO.
For most, buying a 2nd home will lead to financial disaster.
-
AuthorPosts
