Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ocrenter
Participantthe rise of Jim
the fall of Gary
the world may just be on the right track once again.
Participantbring it on. that would seal the death of the Republican party as a party ran by the religious right. The moderate fiscal conservative wing of the party can finally take the party back after that.
a lot of time something has to truly hit rock bottom before it can be reformed and changed for the better.
Participantbring it on. that would seal the death of the Republican party as a party ran by the religious right. The moderate fiscal conservative wing of the party can finally take the party back after that.
a lot of time something has to truly hit rock bottom before it can be reformed and changed for the better.
Participantbring it on. that would seal the death of the Republican party as a party ran by the religious right. The moderate fiscal conservative wing of the party can finally take the party back after that.
a lot of time something has to truly hit rock bottom before it can be reformed and changed for the better.
Participantbring it on. that would seal the death of the Republican party as a party ran by the religious right. The moderate fiscal conservative wing of the party can finally take the party back after that.
a lot of time something has to truly hit rock bottom before it can be reformed and changed for the better.
Participantbring it on. that would seal the death of the Republican party as a party ran by the religious right. The moderate fiscal conservative wing of the party can finally take the party back after that.
a lot of time something has to truly hit rock bottom before it can be reformed and changed for the better.
March 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM in reply to: Slow decline or is a big chunk about to be ripped out? #367576Participantthanks Russell for ‘accidentally’ bumping this up, I would have missed it otherwise.
I was one of those that doubted powayseller when she claimed 50% off peak back in the days. since then I’ve jumped on to her bandwagon and am very glad I did.
we ended up buying at 45% off peak, and I suspect a lot of folks out there will have a hard time justifying additional waiting time by the time they get to 40-45% off peak. this is why the last 5-10% of the decline is going to be dragged out significantly longer than expected. in other word, the pragmatics are going to ruin it for the diehards.
btw, 50% only applies for SD/OC/LA in general, the IE is another animal and I suspect 66% off peak to be true bottom.
March 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM in reply to: Slow decline or is a big chunk about to be ripped out? #367863Participantthanks Russell for ‘accidentally’ bumping this up, I would have missed it otherwise.
I was one of those that doubted powayseller when she claimed 50% off peak back in the days. since then I’ve jumped on to her bandwagon and am very glad I did.
we ended up buying at 45% off peak, and I suspect a lot of folks out there will have a hard time justifying additional waiting time by the time they get to 40-45% off peak. this is why the last 5-10% of the decline is going to be dragged out significantly longer than expected. in other word, the pragmatics are going to ruin it for the diehards.
btw, 50% only applies for SD/OC/LA in general, the IE is another animal and I suspect 66% off peak to be true bottom.
March 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM in reply to: Slow decline or is a big chunk about to be ripped out? #368032Participantthanks Russell for ‘accidentally’ bumping this up, I would have missed it otherwise.
I was one of those that doubted powayseller when she claimed 50% off peak back in the days. since then I’ve jumped on to her bandwagon and am very glad I did.
we ended up buying at 45% off peak, and I suspect a lot of folks out there will have a hard time justifying additional waiting time by the time they get to 40-45% off peak. this is why the last 5-10% of the decline is going to be dragged out significantly longer than expected. in other word, the pragmatics are going to ruin it for the diehards.
btw, 50% only applies for SD/OC/LA in general, the IE is another animal and I suspect 66% off peak to be true bottom.
March 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM in reply to: Slow decline or is a big chunk about to be ripped out? #368068Participantthanks Russell for ‘accidentally’ bumping this up, I would have missed it otherwise.
I was one of those that doubted powayseller when she claimed 50% off peak back in the days. since then I’ve jumped on to her bandwagon and am very glad I did.
we ended up buying at 45% off peak, and I suspect a lot of folks out there will have a hard time justifying additional waiting time by the time they get to 40-45% off peak. this is why the last 5-10% of the decline is going to be dragged out significantly longer than expected. in other word, the pragmatics are going to ruin it for the diehards.
btw, 50% only applies for SD/OC/LA in general, the IE is another animal and I suspect 66% off peak to be true bottom.
March 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM in reply to: Slow decline or is a big chunk about to be ripped out? #368185Participantthanks Russell for ‘accidentally’ bumping this up, I would have missed it otherwise.
I was one of those that doubted powayseller when she claimed 50% off peak back in the days. since then I’ve jumped on to her bandwagon and am very glad I did.
we ended up buying at 45% off peak, and I suspect a lot of folks out there will have a hard time justifying additional waiting time by the time they get to 40-45% off peak. this is why the last 5-10% of the decline is going to be dragged out significantly longer than expected. in other word, the pragmatics are going to ruin it for the diehards.
btw, 50% only applies for SD/OC/LA in general, the IE is another animal and I suspect 66% off peak to be true bottom.
Participantgood question sunny88
he financed at 90% back in 8/2007, monthly carrying cost (not deductible due to not primary resident) is $8200/month.
so far he has held on for 18 months, so that’ll be $147600, $5400 to keep the utility on, water the lawn, and have a gardener come monthly, and assuming $40k for landscaping, that’ll be $193,000 down.
let’s assume $100/back cracked, that’ll be 1930 back cracking sessions.
this is of course provided that he is able to sell at $1.08 million, which is doubtful at this point.
Participantgood question sunny88
he financed at 90% back in 8/2007, monthly carrying cost (not deductible due to not primary resident) is $8200/month.
so far he has held on for 18 months, so that’ll be $147600, $5400 to keep the utility on, water the lawn, and have a gardener come monthly, and assuming $40k for landscaping, that’ll be $193,000 down.
let’s assume $100/back cracked, that’ll be 1930 back cracking sessions.
this is of course provided that he is able to sell at $1.08 million, which is doubtful at this point.
Participantgood question sunny88
he financed at 90% back in 8/2007, monthly carrying cost (not deductible due to not primary resident) is $8200/month.
so far he has held on for 18 months, so that’ll be $147600, $5400 to keep the utility on, water the lawn, and have a gardener come monthly, and assuming $40k for landscaping, that’ll be $193,000 down.
let’s assume $100/back cracked, that’ll be 1930 back cracking sessions.
this is of course provided that he is able to sell at $1.08 million, which is doubtful at this point.
-
AuthorPosts
