Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
moneymakerParticipant
Interesting thread, hopefully I didn’t read it too fast. Let me coin a new term “Lien in Lieu”. This would be where the bank agrees to accept a Lien for the underwater amount or more. If I was the bank I would rather have a lien,someone paying something,and not have to pay for eviction/foreclosure/real estate fees. On the books it would appear essentially as an interest free loan I guess,payable upon sale of property. Thoughts? I know interest free loan is not in a bankers vocabulary,but these are dire times for many folks.
moneymakerParticipantInteresting thread, hopefully I didn’t read it too fast. Let me coin a new term “Lien in Lieu”. This would be where the bank agrees to accept a Lien for the underwater amount or more. If I was the bank I would rather have a lien,someone paying something,and not have to pay for eviction/foreclosure/real estate fees. On the books it would appear essentially as an interest free loan I guess,payable upon sale of property. Thoughts? I know interest free loan is not in a bankers vocabulary,but these are dire times for many folks.
moneymakerParticipantJust a short comment. La Mesa is nice! I would never move a business there though. The city seems to enjoy putting up medians with no u turn signs that impede access to businesses. The police like to harass(probably because they have nothing better to do ,as there is little crime in La Mesa). As a place to live however I would put it 1 notch above Lemon Grove(which I would put 1 notch above Spring Valley).
moneymakerParticipantJust a short comment. La Mesa is nice! I would never move a business there though. The city seems to enjoy putting up medians with no u turn signs that impede access to businesses. The police like to harass(probably because they have nothing better to do ,as there is little crime in La Mesa). As a place to live however I would put it 1 notch above Lemon Grove(which I would put 1 notch above Spring Valley).
moneymakerParticipantJust a short comment. La Mesa is nice! I would never move a business there though. The city seems to enjoy putting up medians with no u turn signs that impede access to businesses. The police like to harass(probably because they have nothing better to do ,as there is little crime in La Mesa). As a place to live however I would put it 1 notch above Lemon Grove(which I would put 1 notch above Spring Valley).
moneymakerParticipantJust a short comment. La Mesa is nice! I would never move a business there though. The city seems to enjoy putting up medians with no u turn signs that impede access to businesses. The police like to harass(probably because they have nothing better to do ,as there is little crime in La Mesa). As a place to live however I would put it 1 notch above Lemon Grove(which I would put 1 notch above Spring Valley).
moneymakerParticipantJust a short comment. La Mesa is nice! I would never move a business there though. The city seems to enjoy putting up medians with no u turn signs that impede access to businesses. The police like to harass(probably because they have nothing better to do ,as there is little crime in La Mesa). As a place to live however I would put it 1 notch above Lemon Grove(which I would put 1 notch above Spring Valley).
moneymakerParticipantSo that’s why I’ve always had a thing for waitresses,they represent the security of having food to eat. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/images/maslows_hierarchy2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/index.html&usg=__z-nMzxUrsSVBIWlEMiUzZaK_Jus=&h=359&w=400&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&sig2=izKjYwTk8e7w4mE_CRvXvA&um=1&tbnid=mjohlAB-hYk_WM:&tbnh=111&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbasic%2Bneeds%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1&ei=vDdKSszlA6PUlQehwtQl
moneymakerParticipantSo that’s why I’ve always had a thing for waitresses,they represent the security of having food to eat. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/images/maslows_hierarchy2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/index.html&usg=__z-nMzxUrsSVBIWlEMiUzZaK_Jus=&h=359&w=400&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&sig2=izKjYwTk8e7w4mE_CRvXvA&um=1&tbnid=mjohlAB-hYk_WM:&tbnh=111&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbasic%2Bneeds%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1&ei=vDdKSszlA6PUlQehwtQl
moneymakerParticipantSo that’s why I’ve always had a thing for waitresses,they represent the security of having food to eat. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/images/maslows_hierarchy2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/index.html&usg=__z-nMzxUrsSVBIWlEMiUzZaK_Jus=&h=359&w=400&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&sig2=izKjYwTk8e7w4mE_CRvXvA&um=1&tbnid=mjohlAB-hYk_WM:&tbnh=111&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbasic%2Bneeds%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1&ei=vDdKSszlA6PUlQehwtQl
moneymakerParticipantSo that’s why I’ve always had a thing for waitresses,they represent the security of having food to eat. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/images/maslows_hierarchy2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/index.html&usg=__z-nMzxUrsSVBIWlEMiUzZaK_Jus=&h=359&w=400&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&sig2=izKjYwTk8e7w4mE_CRvXvA&um=1&tbnid=mjohlAB-hYk_WM:&tbnh=111&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbasic%2Bneeds%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1&ei=vDdKSszlA6PUlQehwtQl
moneymakerParticipantSo that’s why I’ve always had a thing for waitresses,they represent the security of having food to eat. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/images/maslows_hierarchy2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.union.umd.edu/GH/basic_needs/index.html&usg=__z-nMzxUrsSVBIWlEMiUzZaK_Jus=&h=359&w=400&sz=13&hl=en&start=1&sig2=izKjYwTk8e7w4mE_CRvXvA&um=1&tbnid=mjohlAB-hYk_WM:&tbnh=111&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbasic%2Bneeds%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26um%3D1&ei=vDdKSszlA6PUlQehwtQl
moneymakerParticipantMany men marry for sex and women for security. If a man loses his job (no security for wife) and the wife refuses to have sex (with said husband),should they get a divorce? I say no, because no matter how bleak things seem they can always be worse. Man gets divorced,he’s still not getting any and may have to pay (even though he has no job)child support/alimony.
I think it is interesting that women typically file for divorce first and it’s usually men that stop paying bills first.Men that cheat on their wives are probably also the same ones that will cheat their fellow man out of money.Here;s the real question-Do women that shirk their debts often end up cheating on their husbands? Probably no relation, just food for thought.moneymakerParticipantMany men marry for sex and women for security. If a man loses his job (no security for wife) and the wife refuses to have sex (with said husband),should they get a divorce? I say no, because no matter how bleak things seem they can always be worse. Man gets divorced,he’s still not getting any and may have to pay (even though he has no job)child support/alimony.
I think it is interesting that women typically file for divorce first and it’s usually men that stop paying bills first.Men that cheat on their wives are probably also the same ones that will cheat their fellow man out of money.Here;s the real question-Do women that shirk their debts often end up cheating on their husbands? Probably no relation, just food for thought. -
AuthorPosts