Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
moneymaker
Participant[quote=ucodegen]Umm.. did you try this website?
http://www.searspartsdirect.com/partsdirect/index.action?psid=26128424&sid=PSx20071217x00001a
I have had no problems in the past getting parts for many of the Sears products.. What is the model number of the rototiller.
Note: In some cases, a bolt may be better than the normal sheer pin. Use a anti-vibration nut with a nylon end piece.
Depending upon type of tiller, model number may be between back wheels.[/quote]
Yes I did, and this is what I got http://www.searspartsdirect.com/partsdirect/getSubComp.pd?modelNumber=785+295021&productCategoryId=1508000&brandId=0247&modelName=NPA-SEARS-3.5-HP-ROTO-SPADER&diagramPageId=00001&documentId=P9120036&pop=flush
I think everyone is missing my point, perhaps I seemed self motivated. I’m just saying that when you take labor(free for my wife,I don’t charge her) and materials into consideration most people will just go buy a new one. The new one of course comes from overseas and if you think it’s hard to find parts now just wait till these imports start breaking down, if you can’t get the part then you buy a new one and the process just keeps repeating, and they’ve got us by the you know what.
moneymaker
Participant[quote=ucodegen]Umm.. did you try this website?
http://www.searspartsdirect.com/partsdirect/index.action?psid=26128424&sid=PSx20071217x00001a
I have had no problems in the past getting parts for many of the Sears products.. What is the model number of the rototiller.
Note: In some cases, a bolt may be better than the normal sheer pin. Use a anti-vibration nut with a nylon end piece.
Depending upon type of tiller, model number may be between back wheels.[/quote]
Yes I did, and this is what I got http://www.searspartsdirect.com/partsdirect/getSubComp.pd?modelNumber=785+295021&productCategoryId=1508000&brandId=0247&modelName=NPA-SEARS-3.5-HP-ROTO-SPADER&diagramPageId=00001&documentId=P9120036&pop=flush
I think everyone is missing my point, perhaps I seemed self motivated. I’m just saying that when you take labor(free for my wife,I don’t charge her) and materials into consideration most people will just go buy a new one. The new one of course comes from overseas and if you think it’s hard to find parts now just wait till these imports start breaking down, if you can’t get the part then you buy a new one and the process just keeps repeating, and they’ve got us by the you know what.
moneymaker
ParticipantOh that’s bad ! I’ll have to admit that that’s sometimes what it takes for some people.
moneymaker
ParticipantOh that’s bad ! I’ll have to admit that that’s sometimes what it takes for some people.
moneymaker
ParticipantOh that’s bad ! I’ll have to admit that that’s sometimes what it takes for some people.
moneymaker
ParticipantOh that’s bad ! I’ll have to admit that that’s sometimes what it takes for some people.
moneymaker
ParticipantOh that’s bad ! I’ll have to admit that that’s sometimes what it takes for some people.
September 22, 2009 at 9:30 PM in reply to: MERS “chain-of-custody” issues preventing foreclosures. #460372moneymaker
ParticipantSomebody or entity somewhere owns these houses. Ownership can’t change without a paper trail, that’s to protect against fraud. The right of redemption however I’m less clear on. What if someone gets foreclosed on and then before a year is up wins the lottery and wants their house back. You know it’s going to happen to someone in CA someday.I’m guessing all monies would have to retrace, no harm / no foul. The new buyers would just have to happy to get their money back?
September 22, 2009 at 9:30 PM in reply to: MERS “chain-of-custody” issues preventing foreclosures. #460563moneymaker
ParticipantSomebody or entity somewhere owns these houses. Ownership can’t change without a paper trail, that’s to protect against fraud. The right of redemption however I’m less clear on. What if someone gets foreclosed on and then before a year is up wins the lottery and wants their house back. You know it’s going to happen to someone in CA someday.I’m guessing all monies would have to retrace, no harm / no foul. The new buyers would just have to happy to get their money back?
September 22, 2009 at 9:30 PM in reply to: MERS “chain-of-custody” issues preventing foreclosures. #460905moneymaker
ParticipantSomebody or entity somewhere owns these houses. Ownership can’t change without a paper trail, that’s to protect against fraud. The right of redemption however I’m less clear on. What if someone gets foreclosed on and then before a year is up wins the lottery and wants their house back. You know it’s going to happen to someone in CA someday.I’m guessing all monies would have to retrace, no harm / no foul. The new buyers would just have to happy to get their money back?
September 22, 2009 at 9:30 PM in reply to: MERS “chain-of-custody” issues preventing foreclosures. #460977moneymaker
ParticipantSomebody or entity somewhere owns these houses. Ownership can’t change without a paper trail, that’s to protect against fraud. The right of redemption however I’m less clear on. What if someone gets foreclosed on and then before a year is up wins the lottery and wants their house back. You know it’s going to happen to someone in CA someday.I’m guessing all monies would have to retrace, no harm / no foul. The new buyers would just have to happy to get their money back?
September 22, 2009 at 9:30 PM in reply to: MERS “chain-of-custody” issues preventing foreclosures. #461179moneymaker
ParticipantSomebody or entity somewhere owns these houses. Ownership can’t change without a paper trail, that’s to protect against fraud. The right of redemption however I’m less clear on. What if someone gets foreclosed on and then before a year is up wins the lottery and wants their house back. You know it’s going to happen to someone in CA someday.I’m guessing all monies would have to retrace, no harm / no foul. The new buyers would just have to happy to get their money back?
moneymaker
ParticipantActually that house is really nice, I don’t have doors on my closets. As soon as I can rustle up 1.6 Million I’ll buy it and rent out the house I’m in. Seems like a bargain,of course I know how the internet can distort reality,so I’d have to see it in person.
moneymaker
ParticipantActually that house is really nice, I don’t have doors on my closets. As soon as I can rustle up 1.6 Million I’ll buy it and rent out the house I’m in. Seems like a bargain,of course I know how the internet can distort reality,so I’d have to see it in person.
-
AuthorPosts
