Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
meadandale
ParticipantI have a funky kitchen (50 year old house). There originally was no range hood over my range, just a hole in the ceiling that allowed passive air flow.
I finally had a range hood installed over it last year.
This is the one I had installed:
http://www.kitchensource.com/range-hoods/mo-zv830sm.htm
I love it. I can finally cook meat on the stove or boil water without the whole kitchen getting smoky or steamy.
ParticipantI have a funky kitchen (50 year old house). There originally was no range hood over my range, just a hole in the ceiling that allowed passive air flow.
I finally had a range hood installed over it last year.
This is the one I had installed:
http://www.kitchensource.com/range-hoods/mo-zv830sm.htm
I love it. I can finally cook meat on the stove or boil water without the whole kitchen getting smoky or steamy.
ParticipantI have a funky kitchen (50 year old house). There originally was no range hood over my range, just a hole in the ceiling that allowed passive air flow.
I finally had a range hood installed over it last year.
This is the one I had installed:
http://www.kitchensource.com/range-hoods/mo-zv830sm.htm
I love it. I can finally cook meat on the stove or boil water without the whole kitchen getting smoky or steamy.
ParticipantMy combined effective tax rate for 2009 (state/federal/payroll) was over 38%.
Apparently Mark Twain was right…
ParticipantMy combined effective tax rate for 2009 (state/federal/payroll) was over 38%.
Apparently Mark Twain was right…
ParticipantMy combined effective tax rate for 2009 (state/federal/payroll) was over 38%.
Apparently Mark Twain was right…
ParticipantMy combined effective tax rate for 2009 (state/federal/payroll) was over 38%.
Apparently Mark Twain was right…
ParticipantMy combined effective tax rate for 2009 (state/federal/payroll) was over 38%.
Apparently Mark Twain was right…
ParticipantYeah but that 28% tax rate doesn’t include payroll taxes, which add another 7.6% for the individual and another 7.6% for the employer. That means that our tax rate is AS HIGH as the OECD average you posted.
As someone who sympathizes with the tea party point of view but hasn’t actually gone to any rallies: it is clear that based on the trillion dollar deficits that Obama is projecting for at least the next decade that taxes WILL have to go up…and substantially, to pay for all this borrowing and deficit spending at some point. I can’t get behind this kind of reckless governing.
If that makes me a ‘teabagger’ then so be it.
ParticipantYeah but that 28% tax rate doesn’t include payroll taxes, which add another 7.6% for the individual and another 7.6% for the employer. That means that our tax rate is AS HIGH as the OECD average you posted.
As someone who sympathizes with the tea party point of view but hasn’t actually gone to any rallies: it is clear that based on the trillion dollar deficits that Obama is projecting for at least the next decade that taxes WILL have to go up…and substantially, to pay for all this borrowing and deficit spending at some point. I can’t get behind this kind of reckless governing.
If that makes me a ‘teabagger’ then so be it.
ParticipantYeah but that 28% tax rate doesn’t include payroll taxes, which add another 7.6% for the individual and another 7.6% for the employer. That means that our tax rate is AS HIGH as the OECD average you posted.
As someone who sympathizes with the tea party point of view but hasn’t actually gone to any rallies: it is clear that based on the trillion dollar deficits that Obama is projecting for at least the next decade that taxes WILL have to go up…and substantially, to pay for all this borrowing and deficit spending at some point. I can’t get behind this kind of reckless governing.
If that makes me a ‘teabagger’ then so be it.
ParticipantYeah but that 28% tax rate doesn’t include payroll taxes, which add another 7.6% for the individual and another 7.6% for the employer. That means that our tax rate is AS HIGH as the OECD average you posted.
As someone who sympathizes with the tea party point of view but hasn’t actually gone to any rallies: it is clear that based on the trillion dollar deficits that Obama is projecting for at least the next decade that taxes WILL have to go up…and substantially, to pay for all this borrowing and deficit spending at some point. I can’t get behind this kind of reckless governing.
If that makes me a ‘teabagger’ then so be it.
ParticipantYeah but that 28% tax rate doesn’t include payroll taxes, which add another 7.6% for the individual and another 7.6% for the employer. That means that our tax rate is AS HIGH as the OECD average you posted.
As someone who sympathizes with the tea party point of view but hasn’t actually gone to any rallies: it is clear that based on the trillion dollar deficits that Obama is projecting for at least the next decade that taxes WILL have to go up…and substantially, to pay for all this borrowing and deficit spending at some point. I can’t get behind this kind of reckless governing.
If that makes me a ‘teabagger’ then so be it.
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=gandalf]
As a percentage of income / wealth gains, did you pay more or less tax than last year?
[/quote]Most Tea Partiers don’t know.
It’s the Joe-the-Plumber and Sarah Palin mentality, remember? The two of them are in bed together.[/quote]
I paid higher effective tax rates in 2009 than in 2008 to both the state and the federal government. It’s all there in black and white on my income tax returns.
So you can understand why I have to laugh every time a liberal, including Obama, asserts that I’m paying lower taxes since he took office.
-
AuthorPosts
