Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
meadandale
ParticipantBeen with SDCCU for about 17 years. My how they’ve grown. Used to only be accessible to city/county employees and their family.
Highly recommended. Wouldn’t ever go back to a bank like WAMU or BofA.
ParticipantBeen with SDCCU for about 17 years. My how they’ve grown. Used to only be accessible to city/county employees and their family.
Highly recommended. Wouldn’t ever go back to a bank like WAMU or BofA.
ParticipantBeen with SDCCU for about 17 years. My how they’ve grown. Used to only be accessible to city/county employees and their family.
Highly recommended. Wouldn’t ever go back to a bank like WAMU or BofA.
ParticipantComparing Math/Probability with Real Estate…
Novel approach. However, Mathematicians hold themselves to a much higher standard of PROOF. It’s like Fermat’s Last Theorem. You may not understand Andrew Wiles math but the experts who have verified his proof do and they’ve said it is correct. Debating it is pointless.
Next thing you’ll be disputing 1+1=2
ParticipantComparing Math/Probability with Real Estate…
Novel approach. However, Mathematicians hold themselves to a much higher standard of PROOF. It’s like Fermat’s Last Theorem. You may not understand Andrew Wiles math but the experts who have verified his proof do and they’ve said it is correct. Debating it is pointless.
Next thing you’ll be disputing 1+1=2
ParticipantComparing Math/Probability with Real Estate…
Novel approach. However, Mathematicians hold themselves to a much higher standard of PROOF. It’s like Fermat’s Last Theorem. You may not understand Andrew Wiles math but the experts who have verified his proof do and they’ve said it is correct. Debating it is pointless.
Next thing you’ll be disputing 1+1=2
ParticipantComparing Math/Probability with Real Estate…
Novel approach. However, Mathematicians hold themselves to a much higher standard of PROOF. It’s like Fermat’s Last Theorem. You may not understand Andrew Wiles math but the experts who have verified his proof do and they’ve said it is correct. Debating it is pointless.
Next thing you’ll be disputing 1+1=2
ParticipantComparing Math/Probability with Real Estate…
Novel approach. However, Mathematicians hold themselves to a much higher standard of PROOF. It’s like Fermat’s Last Theorem. You may not understand Andrew Wiles math but the experts who have verified his proof do and they’ve said it is correct. Debating it is pointless.
Next thing you’ll be disputing 1+1=2
ParticipantYou mean the small POS next to the overbuilt gaudy monstrosity?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2227-Illion-St-92110/home/5217107
ParticipantYou mean the small POS next to the overbuilt gaudy monstrosity?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2227-Illion-St-92110/home/5217107
ParticipantYou mean the small POS next to the overbuilt gaudy monstrosity?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2227-Illion-St-92110/home/5217107
ParticipantYou mean the small POS next to the overbuilt gaudy monstrosity?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2227-Illion-St-92110/home/5217107
ParticipantYou mean the small POS next to the overbuilt gaudy monstrosity?
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2227-Illion-St-92110/home/5217107
ParticipantI don’t know why some of you people are arguing against the 2/3 answer. It IS the correct answer, whether you understand the logic or not.
People who study probabilities for a living have said this is the answer. All you amateur naysayers should just capitulate and move on…:-)
-
AuthorPosts
