Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
LuckyInOC
ParticipantAs for Shadow Inventory, I believe the FDIC numbers tell a lot of the story. For Past Due and Nonaccrual Assets here are some of the numbers for “1-4 family residential properties” only, unless noted otherwise.
As of 6/30/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $68.2 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $64.8 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $83.5 Billion
Total: $216.5 BillionAs of 3/31/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $74.8 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $56.3 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $78.3 Billion
Total: $209.4 BillionAs of 12/31/08:
Past Due < 90 days: $79.2 Billion (Peak) Past Due > 90 days: $44.9 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $59.6 Billion
Total: $183.7 BillionIt appears banks have added $32.8 Billion in distressed properties. The Past Due > 90 days and Nonaccrual Status has greatly increased in two quarters. One might call that Shadow Inventory. Especially, those shown as Nonaccrual Status.
As for Shadow Sales, in order to sell properties at a discount, I would think you would have an charge-off for those properties.
As of 6/30/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $24.3 BillionAs of 3/31/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $10.7 BillionAs of 12/31/08 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $26.4 BillionIn six months, the banks have matched last year’s charge-offs. The question of shadow sales would be how much of these properties sold other than thru MLS. Banks have $57.1 Billion in distressed or charge-off’s. Total loans as of 6/30/09 is $2,685 Billion or 2.13% of all loan value.
One thing I did find new and interesting. FDIC has started to track restuctured loans. As of 6/30/09, $28.9 Billion of the loans were restructured. Principle reductions may have been shown in the charge offs.
Noncurent Loans to Loans:
As of 6/30/09: 5.52%
As of 3/31/09: 4.87%
As of 12/31/09: 3.8%The Nonaccrual Status was 9.3 Billion when is started being tracked in 2001. It has grown to $83.5 Billion or 9 times. This is what I would consider as the definition ‘Shadow Inventory’.
Source: http://www2.fdic.gov/SDI/SOB/
And, yes, that is the data link… ‘SOB’
Statistics On Banking…
I prefer the other well know term.Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantAs for Shadow Inventory, I believe the FDIC numbers tell a lot of the story. For Past Due and Nonaccrual Assets here are some of the numbers for “1-4 family residential properties” only, unless noted otherwise.
As of 6/30/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $68.2 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $64.8 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $83.5 Billion
Total: $216.5 BillionAs of 3/31/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $74.8 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $56.3 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $78.3 Billion
Total: $209.4 BillionAs of 12/31/08:
Past Due < 90 days: $79.2 Billion (Peak) Past Due > 90 days: $44.9 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $59.6 Billion
Total: $183.7 BillionIt appears banks have added $32.8 Billion in distressed properties. The Past Due > 90 days and Nonaccrual Status has greatly increased in two quarters. One might call that Shadow Inventory. Especially, those shown as Nonaccrual Status.
As for Shadow Sales, in order to sell properties at a discount, I would think you would have an charge-off for those properties.
As of 6/30/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $24.3 BillionAs of 3/31/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $10.7 BillionAs of 12/31/08 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $26.4 BillionIn six months, the banks have matched last year’s charge-offs. The question of shadow sales would be how much of these properties sold other than thru MLS. Banks have $57.1 Billion in distressed or charge-off’s. Total loans as of 6/30/09 is $2,685 Billion or 2.13% of all loan value.
One thing I did find new and interesting. FDIC has started to track restuctured loans. As of 6/30/09, $28.9 Billion of the loans were restructured. Principle reductions may have been shown in the charge offs.
Noncurent Loans to Loans:
As of 6/30/09: 5.52%
As of 3/31/09: 4.87%
As of 12/31/09: 3.8%The Nonaccrual Status was 9.3 Billion when is started being tracked in 2001. It has grown to $83.5 Billion or 9 times. This is what I would consider as the definition ‘Shadow Inventory’.
Source: http://www2.fdic.gov/SDI/SOB/
And, yes, that is the data link… ‘SOB’
Statistics On Banking…
I prefer the other well know term.Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantAs for Shadow Inventory, I believe the FDIC numbers tell a lot of the story. For Past Due and Nonaccrual Assets here are some of the numbers for “1-4 family residential properties” only, unless noted otherwise.
As of 6/30/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $68.2 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $64.8 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $83.5 Billion
Total: $216.5 BillionAs of 3/31/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $74.8 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $56.3 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $78.3 Billion
Total: $209.4 BillionAs of 12/31/08:
Past Due < 90 days: $79.2 Billion (Peak) Past Due > 90 days: $44.9 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $59.6 Billion
Total: $183.7 BillionIt appears banks have added $32.8 Billion in distressed properties. The Past Due > 90 days and Nonaccrual Status has greatly increased in two quarters. One might call that Shadow Inventory. Especially, those shown as Nonaccrual Status.
As for Shadow Sales, in order to sell properties at a discount, I would think you would have an charge-off for those properties.
As of 6/30/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $24.3 BillionAs of 3/31/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $10.7 BillionAs of 12/31/08 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $26.4 BillionIn six months, the banks have matched last year’s charge-offs. The question of shadow sales would be how much of these properties sold other than thru MLS. Banks have $57.1 Billion in distressed or charge-off’s. Total loans as of 6/30/09 is $2,685 Billion or 2.13% of all loan value.
One thing I did find new and interesting. FDIC has started to track restuctured loans. As of 6/30/09, $28.9 Billion of the loans were restructured. Principle reductions may have been shown in the charge offs.
Noncurent Loans to Loans:
As of 6/30/09: 5.52%
As of 3/31/09: 4.87%
As of 12/31/09: 3.8%The Nonaccrual Status was 9.3 Billion when is started being tracked in 2001. It has grown to $83.5 Billion or 9 times. This is what I would consider as the definition ‘Shadow Inventory’.
Source: http://www2.fdic.gov/SDI/SOB/
And, yes, that is the data link… ‘SOB’
Statistics On Banking…
I prefer the other well know term.Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantAs for Shadow Inventory, I believe the FDIC numbers tell a lot of the story. For Past Due and Nonaccrual Assets here are some of the numbers for “1-4 family residential properties” only, unless noted otherwise.
As of 6/30/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $68.2 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $64.8 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $83.5 Billion
Total: $216.5 BillionAs of 3/31/09:
Past Due < 90 days: $74.8 Billion Past Due > 90 days: $56.3 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $78.3 Billion
Total: $209.4 BillionAs of 12/31/08:
Past Due < 90 days: $79.2 Billion (Peak) Past Due > 90 days: $44.9 Billion
Nonaccrual Status: $59.6 Billion
Total: $183.7 BillionIt appears banks have added $32.8 Billion in distressed properties. The Past Due > 90 days and Nonaccrual Status has greatly increased in two quarters. One might call that Shadow Inventory. Especially, those shown as Nonaccrual Status.
As for Shadow Sales, in order to sell properties at a discount, I would think you would have an charge-off for those properties.
As of 6/30/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $24.3 BillionAs of 3/31/09 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $10.7 BillionAs of 12/31/08 (Year to Date):
Net Charge Offs: $26.4 BillionIn six months, the banks have matched last year’s charge-offs. The question of shadow sales would be how much of these properties sold other than thru MLS. Banks have $57.1 Billion in distressed or charge-off’s. Total loans as of 6/30/09 is $2,685 Billion or 2.13% of all loan value.
One thing I did find new and interesting. FDIC has started to track restuctured loans. As of 6/30/09, $28.9 Billion of the loans were restructured. Principle reductions may have been shown in the charge offs.
Noncurent Loans to Loans:
As of 6/30/09: 5.52%
As of 3/31/09: 4.87%
As of 12/31/09: 3.8%The Nonaccrual Status was 9.3 Billion when is started being tracked in 2001. It has grown to $83.5 Billion or 9 times. This is what I would consider as the definition ‘Shadow Inventory’.
Source: http://www2.fdic.gov/SDI/SOB/
And, yes, that is the data link… ‘SOB’
Statistics On Banking…
I prefer the other well know term.Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantParamount,
[quote=paramount]I was also considering the foothills of the Sierra’s as well.[/quote]
Check out Groveland, CA or Pine Mountain Lake.
http://www.sierragatewaymap.com/groveland.html
30 miles west of Yosemite, PML is a private community with lake, airport, golf course. 3000 ft elev. with low precipitation. It is a mixed ranch/pine environment. I don’t own any property there. Rented a 3b/2b 2000 sf. home for $1200 for 7 days. The only problem is the drive. Highly considering a purchase there, wife and kids love it.
Next time you want to go to Yosemite, stay there. We drove from Groveland to Mono Lake and back thru Yosemite in one day.
Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantParamount,
[quote=paramount]I was also considering the foothills of the Sierra’s as well.[/quote]
Check out Groveland, CA or Pine Mountain Lake.
http://www.sierragatewaymap.com/groveland.html
30 miles west of Yosemite, PML is a private community with lake, airport, golf course. 3000 ft elev. with low precipitation. It is a mixed ranch/pine environment. I don’t own any property there. Rented a 3b/2b 2000 sf. home for $1200 for 7 days. The only problem is the drive. Highly considering a purchase there, wife and kids love it.
Next time you want to go to Yosemite, stay there. We drove from Groveland to Mono Lake and back thru Yosemite in one day.
Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantParamount,
[quote=paramount]I was also considering the foothills of the Sierra’s as well.[/quote]
Check out Groveland, CA or Pine Mountain Lake.
http://www.sierragatewaymap.com/groveland.html
30 miles west of Yosemite, PML is a private community with lake, airport, golf course. 3000 ft elev. with low precipitation. It is a mixed ranch/pine environment. I don’t own any property there. Rented a 3b/2b 2000 sf. home for $1200 for 7 days. The only problem is the drive. Highly considering a purchase there, wife and kids love it.
Next time you want to go to Yosemite, stay there. We drove from Groveland to Mono Lake and back thru Yosemite in one day.
Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantParamount,
[quote=paramount]I was also considering the foothills of the Sierra’s as well.[/quote]
Check out Groveland, CA or Pine Mountain Lake.
http://www.sierragatewaymap.com/groveland.html
30 miles west of Yosemite, PML is a private community with lake, airport, golf course. 3000 ft elev. with low precipitation. It is a mixed ranch/pine environment. I don’t own any property there. Rented a 3b/2b 2000 sf. home for $1200 for 7 days. The only problem is the drive. Highly considering a purchase there, wife and kids love it.
Next time you want to go to Yosemite, stay there. We drove from Groveland to Mono Lake and back thru Yosemite in one day.
Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
ParticipantParamount,
[quote=paramount]I was also considering the foothills of the Sierra’s as well.[/quote]
Check out Groveland, CA or Pine Mountain Lake.
http://www.sierragatewaymap.com/groveland.html
30 miles west of Yosemite, PML is a private community with lake, airport, golf course. 3000 ft elev. with low precipitation. It is a mixed ranch/pine environment. I don’t own any property there. Rented a 3b/2b 2000 sf. home for $1200 for 7 days. The only problem is the drive. Highly considering a purchase there, wife and kids love it.
Next time you want to go to Yosemite, stay there. We drove from Groveland to Mono Lake and back thru Yosemite in one day.
Lucky In OC
LuckyInOC
Participant[quote=mwtosd]Check out the carpet!!! the stylish appliances are not bad either! π
http://www.sdlookup.com/Pictures-090043617%5B/quote%5D
The carpet looks like remnants from a cheap vegas casino…
Luck In OC
LuckyInOC
Participant[quote=mwtosd]Check out the carpet!!! the stylish appliances are not bad either! π
http://www.sdlookup.com/Pictures-090043617%5B/quote%5D
The carpet looks like remnants from a cheap vegas casino…
Luck In OC
LuckyInOC
Participant[quote=mwtosd]Check out the carpet!!! the stylish appliances are not bad either! π
http://www.sdlookup.com/Pictures-090043617%5B/quote%5D
The carpet looks like remnants from a cheap vegas casino…
Luck In OC
LuckyInOC
Participant[quote=mwtosd]Check out the carpet!!! the stylish appliances are not bad either! π
http://www.sdlookup.com/Pictures-090043617%5B/quote%5D
The carpet looks like remnants from a cheap vegas casino…
Luck In OC
LuckyInOC
Participant[quote=mwtosd]Check out the carpet!!! the stylish appliances are not bad either! π
http://www.sdlookup.com/Pictures-090043617%5B/quote%5D
The carpet looks like remnants from a cheap vegas casino…
Luck In OC
-
AuthorPosts
