Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Kingside
ParticipantAnother possible downside to giving personal guarantees is that true guarantors are not entitled to anti-deficiency protection in California, even if it is a non-judicial forclosure if the LLC defaults.
ParticipantAnother possible downside to giving personal guarantees is that true guarantors are not entitled to anti-deficiency protection in California, even if it is a non-judicial forclosure if the LLC defaults.
ParticipantAnother possible downside to giving personal guarantees is that true guarantors are not entitled to anti-deficiency protection in California, even if it is a non-judicial forclosure if the LLC defaults.
ParticipantWill the numbers still work if you get a hard money lender at higher rates and fees instead of conventional financing? If you have a hard money lender lined up who you develop a relationship with, you could approach sellers as effectively offering cash to get discounts, and then refinance to conventional when conditions permit. Obviously there are risks with assuming this will happen. So be sure of your numbers and assumptions.
As a practical matter, I think a hard money lender is the only hands on decision making lender you will find that will be there for final say on loan approvals for investment property in the current lending climate.
ParticipantWill the numbers still work if you get a hard money lender at higher rates and fees instead of conventional financing? If you have a hard money lender lined up who you develop a relationship with, you could approach sellers as effectively offering cash to get discounts, and then refinance to conventional when conditions permit. Obviously there are risks with assuming this will happen. So be sure of your numbers and assumptions.
As a practical matter, I think a hard money lender is the only hands on decision making lender you will find that will be there for final say on loan approvals for investment property in the current lending climate.
ParticipantWill the numbers still work if you get a hard money lender at higher rates and fees instead of conventional financing? If you have a hard money lender lined up who you develop a relationship with, you could approach sellers as effectively offering cash to get discounts, and then refinance to conventional when conditions permit. Obviously there are risks with assuming this will happen. So be sure of your numbers and assumptions.
As a practical matter, I think a hard money lender is the only hands on decision making lender you will find that will be there for final say on loan approvals for investment property in the current lending climate.
ParticipantWill the numbers still work if you get a hard money lender at higher rates and fees instead of conventional financing? If you have a hard money lender lined up who you develop a relationship with, you could approach sellers as effectively offering cash to get discounts, and then refinance to conventional when conditions permit. Obviously there are risks with assuming this will happen. So be sure of your numbers and assumptions.
As a practical matter, I think a hard money lender is the only hands on decision making lender you will find that will be there for final say on loan approvals for investment property in the current lending climate.
ParticipantWill the numbers still work if you get a hard money lender at higher rates and fees instead of conventional financing? If you have a hard money lender lined up who you develop a relationship with, you could approach sellers as effectively offering cash to get discounts, and then refinance to conventional when conditions permit. Obviously there are risks with assuming this will happen. So be sure of your numbers and assumptions.
As a practical matter, I think a hard money lender is the only hands on decision making lender you will find that will be there for final say on loan approvals for investment property in the current lending climate.
ParticipantI looked at this while it was still listed. It actually only has 3 bedrooms. I don’t know why they listed it as having 5.
And the front yard was a driveway to the next door house.
I am surprised they were able to get 1.05M.
ParticipantI looked at this while it was still listed. It actually only has 3 bedrooms. I don’t know why they listed it as having 5.
And the front yard was a driveway to the next door house.
I am surprised they were able to get 1.05M.
ParticipantI looked at this while it was still listed. It actually only has 3 bedrooms. I don’t know why they listed it as having 5.
And the front yard was a driveway to the next door house.
I am surprised they were able to get 1.05M.
ParticipantI looked at this while it was still listed. It actually only has 3 bedrooms. I don’t know why they listed it as having 5.
And the front yard was a driveway to the next door house.
I am surprised they were able to get 1.05M.
ParticipantI looked at this while it was still listed. It actually only has 3 bedrooms. I don’t know why they listed it as having 5.
And the front yard was a driveway to the next door house.
I am surprised they were able to get 1.05M.
May 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM in reply to: FDIC Chairman On the Great Credit Squeeze: How it Happened, How to Prevent Another; #206517ParticipantHLS, you seem pretty anti-investor. IMHO, investors will eventually be a big part of the solution, once fundamentals make sense for investors. The problem of speculators seeing housing as appreciating flipable equity was a few years ago. I don’t think it is how most investors view the situation today.
Why wouldn’t AITDs be acceptable in the right situation? you seem to suggest there is something wrong with them on principal. You think passing rules to discourage investors will get us through the train wreck quicker? I think the opposite is true.
Alienation of property should be encouraged, not restrained.
-
AuthorPosts
