[kewp]

[quote=partypup]And you’re forgetting that when highly-compensated professionals lose their jobs, the ripple effect in the economy is greater because their salaries were expended on a greater volume of goods and services than, say, a mechanic at a Chrysler dealership. [/quote]

There is a finite supply of money.

If lawyers aren’t getting paid, someone else is. Which is fine by me.

Fire all the lawyers and pay everyone else twice as much. Sounds like a good deal to me!

[kewp]

[quote=partypup]And you’re forgetting that when highly-compensated professionals lose their jobs, the ripple effect in the economy is greater because their salaries were expended on a greater volume of goods and services than, say, a mechanic at a Chrysler dealership. [/quote]

There is a finite supply of money.

If lawyers aren’t getting paid, someone else is. Which is fine by me.

Fire all the lawyers and pay everyone else twice as much. Sounds like a good deal to me!

[kewp]

[quote=partypup]And you’re forgetting that when highly-compensated professionals lose their jobs, the ripple effect in the economy is greater because their salaries were expended on a greater volume of goods and services than, say, a mechanic at a Chrysler dealership. [/quote]

There is a finite supply of money.

If lawyers aren’t getting paid, someone else is. Which is fine by me.

Fire all the lawyers and pay everyone else twice as much. Sounds like a good deal to me!

[kewp]

[quote=partypup]And you’re forgetting that when highly-compensated professionals lose their jobs, the ripple effect in the economy is greater because their salaries were expended on a greater volume of goods and services than, say, a mechanic at a Chrysler dealership. [/quote]

There is a finite supply of money.

If lawyers aren’t getting paid, someone else is. Which is fine by me.

Fire all the lawyers and pay everyone else twice as much. Sounds like a good deal to me!

[kewp]

[quote=partypup]And you’re forgetting that when highly-compensated professionals lose their jobs, the ripple effect in the economy is greater because their salaries were expended on a greater volume of goods and services than, say, a mechanic at a Chrysler dealership. [/quote]

There is a finite supply of money.

If lawyers aren’t getting paid, someone else is. Which is fine by me.

Fire all the lawyers and pay everyone else twice as much. Sounds like a good deal to me!

[kewp]

[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”

Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]

I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!

[kewp]

[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”

Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]

I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!

[kewp]

[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”

Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]

I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!

[kewp]

[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”

Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]

I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!

[kewp]

[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”

Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]

I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!

[kewp]

[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
My two cents, (grab the bargains while they last) oh and I think I used to hear the same things in 1990 , you know Japan going to rule the world, U.S.A. to become Mexico. world to end in 2000 the list goes on.[/quote]

I hear that!

Whenever someone talks about China becoming our new overlords, I always remember that it was supposed to be the Japanese first.

Maybe its a cultural thing?

[kewp]

[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
My two cents, (grab the bargains while they last) oh and I think I used to hear the same things in 1990 , you know Japan going to rule the world, U.S.A. to become Mexico. world to end in 2000 the list goes on.[/quote]

I hear that!

Whenever someone talks about China becoming our new overlords, I always remember that it was supposed to be the Japanese first.

Maybe its a cultural thing?

[kewp]

[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
My two cents, (grab the bargains while they last) oh and I think I used to hear the same things in 1990 , you know Japan going to rule the world, U.S.A. to become Mexico. world to end in 2000 the list goes on.[/quote]

I hear that!

Whenever someone talks about China becoming our new overlords, I always remember that it was supposed to be the Japanese first.

Maybe its a cultural thing?

[kewp]

[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
My two cents, (grab the bargains while they last) oh and I think I used to hear the same things in 1990 , you know Japan going to rule the world, U.S.A. to become Mexico. world to end in 2000 the list goes on.[/quote]

I hear that!

Whenever someone talks about China becoming our new overlords, I always remember that it was supposed to be the Japanese first.

Maybe its a cultural thing?

[kewp]

[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
My two cents, (grab the bargains while they last) oh and I think I used to hear the same things in 1990 , you know Japan going to rule the world, U.S.A. to become Mexico. world to end in 2000 the list goes on.[/quote]

I hear that!

Whenever someone talks about China becoming our new overlords, I always remember that it was supposed to be the Japanese first.

Maybe its a cultural thing?

[Author]

Posts