[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
[/quote]

Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

See:

http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
[/quote]

Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

See:

http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
[/quote]

Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

See:

http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
[/quote]

Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

See:

http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
[/quote]

Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

See:

http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
The difference that continues to elude you is that the money to pay those executives comes from the profit of actually making/selling a product in the private sector.
[/quote]

Uh, except these companies aren’t turning a profit. They are losing hundreds of billions of dollars. And the executives are still raking in multi-million dollar salaries courtesy of tax-payer funded bailouts.

Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
The difference that continues to elude you is that the money to pay those executives comes from the profit of actually making/selling a product in the private sector.
[/quote]

Uh, except these companies aren’t turning a profit. They are losing hundreds of billions of dollars. And the executives are still raking in multi-million dollar salaries courtesy of tax-payer funded bailouts.

Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
The difference that continues to elude you is that the money to pay those executives comes from the profit of actually making/selling a product in the private sector.
[/quote]

Uh, except these companies aren’t turning a profit. They are losing hundreds of billions of dollars. And the executives are still raking in multi-million dollar salaries courtesy of tax-payer funded bailouts.

Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
The difference that continues to elude you is that the money to pay those executives comes from the profit of actually making/selling a product in the private sector.
[/quote]

Uh, except these companies aren’t turning a profit. They are losing hundreds of billions of dollars. And the executives are still raking in multi-million dollar salaries courtesy of tax-payer funded bailouts.

Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]
The difference that continues to elude you is that the money to pay those executives comes from the profit of actually making/selling a product in the private sector.
[/quote]

Uh, except these companies aren’t turning a profit. They are losing hundreds of billions of dollars. And the executives are still raking in multi-million dollar salaries courtesy of tax-payer funded bailouts.

Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]Here you go kewp…Here’s your example of underpaid, efficient and honest government workers in your neck of the woods:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081212/news_lz1ed12top.html%5B/quote%5D

Again, those are all senior executives. Fire them all. Please.

Executive pay should be capped at 5X the lowest employee wage regardless of industry.

You really should compare apples to apples and their compensation packages to Wall Street, Detroit and Oil company execs. It’s not even close by many orders of magnitude.

And for the record, the entire UC endowment is less than 1% of the current Fed bailout of the supposedly ‘efficient’ free market!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]Here you go kewp…Here’s your example of underpaid, efficient and honest government workers in your neck of the woods:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081212/news_lz1ed12top.html%5B/quote%5D

Again, those are all senior executives. Fire them all. Please.

Executive pay should be capped at 5X the lowest employee wage regardless of industry.

You really should compare apples to apples and their compensation packages to Wall Street, Detroit and Oil company execs. It’s not even close by many orders of magnitude.

And for the record, the entire UC endowment is less than 1% of the current Fed bailout of the supposedly ‘efficient’ free market!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]Here you go kewp…Here’s your example of underpaid, efficient and honest government workers in your neck of the woods:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081212/news_lz1ed12top.html%5B/quote%5D

Again, those are all senior executives. Fire them all. Please.

Executive pay should be capped at 5X the lowest employee wage regardless of industry.

You really should compare apples to apples and their compensation packages to Wall Street, Detroit and Oil company execs. It’s not even close by many orders of magnitude.

And for the record, the entire UC endowment is less than 1% of the current Fed bailout of the supposedly ‘efficient’ free market!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]Here you go kewp…Here’s your example of underpaid, efficient and honest government workers in your neck of the woods:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081212/news_lz1ed12top.html%5B/quote%5D

Again, those are all senior executives. Fire them all. Please.

Executive pay should be capped at 5X the lowest employee wage regardless of industry.

You really should compare apples to apples and their compensation packages to Wall Street, Detroit and Oil company execs. It’s not even close by many orders of magnitude.

And for the record, the entire UC endowment is less than 1% of the current Fed bailout of the supposedly ‘efficient’ free market!

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]Here you go kewp…Here’s your example of underpaid, efficient and honest government workers in your neck of the woods:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081212/news_lz1ed12top.html%5B/quote%5D

Again, those are all senior executives. Fire them all. Please.

Executive pay should be capped at 5X the lowest employee wage regardless of industry.

You really should compare apples to apples and their compensation packages to Wall Street, Detroit and Oil company execs. It’s not even close by many orders of magnitude.

And for the record, the entire UC endowment is less than 1% of the current Fed bailout of the supposedly ‘efficient’ free market!

[Author]

Posts