Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 16, 2008 at 11:03 AM in reply to: Is an SFV purchase in South OC going to be ever possible again? #240560
kev374
ParticipantLOL! you guys are too funny! 😀
ParticipantLOL! you guys are too funny! 😀
ParticipantLOL! you guys are too funny! 😀
ParticipantLOL! you guys are too funny! 😀
ParticipantLOL! you guys are too funny! 😀
Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
Participant[quote=waiting for bottom]My wife and I have $150K with one bank. From what I read, as long as they are joint accounts we are covered to $200K. Is this correct? Any tips and how to make sure I am bulletproof (other than putting the cash in my mattress)?[/quote]
You better double and triple check that fact. Better to even get something in writing from the bank (or print from FDIC literature) rather than some verbal promises.
Participant[quote=waiting for bottom]My wife and I have $150K with one bank. From what I read, as long as they are joint accounts we are covered to $200K. Is this correct? Any tips and how to make sure I am bulletproof (other than putting the cash in my mattress)?[/quote]
You better double and triple check that fact. Better to even get something in writing from the bank (or print from FDIC literature) rather than some verbal promises.
Participant[quote=waiting for bottom]My wife and I have $150K with one bank. From what I read, as long as they are joint accounts we are covered to $200K. Is this correct? Any tips and how to make sure I am bulletproof (other than putting the cash in my mattress)?[/quote]
You better double and triple check that fact. Better to even get something in writing from the bank (or print from FDIC literature) rather than some verbal promises.
Participant[quote=waiting for bottom]My wife and I have $150K with one bank. From what I read, as long as they are joint accounts we are covered to $200K. Is this correct? Any tips and how to make sure I am bulletproof (other than putting the cash in my mattress)?[/quote]
You better double and triple check that fact. Better to even get something in writing from the bank (or print from FDIC literature) rather than some verbal promises.
-
AuthorPosts
