Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
justme
ParticipantListen,
this whole “let us vote out the incumbents” campaign is just a ruse to install a republican majority in Congress.
Don’t fall for it.
Remember it is the republican “free market” philosophy that got us into all this trouble to begin with.
justme
ParticipantListen,
this whole “let us vote out the incumbents” campaign is just a ruse to install a republican majority in Congress.
Don’t fall for it.
Remember it is the republican “free market” philosophy that got us into all this trouble to begin with.
justme
ParticipantListen,
this whole “let us vote out the incumbents” campaign is just a ruse to install a republican majority in Congress.
Don’t fall for it.
Remember it is the republican “free market” philosophy that got us into all this trouble to begin with.
justme
ParticipantListen,
this whole “let us vote out the incumbents” campaign is just a ruse to install a republican majority in Congress.
Don’t fall for it.
Remember it is the republican “free market” philosophy that got us into all this trouble to begin with.
justme
ParticipantListen,
this whole “let us vote out the incumbents” campaign is just a ruse to install a republican majority in Congress.
Don’t fall for it.
Remember it is the republican “free market” philosophy that got us into all this trouble to begin with.
July 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM in reply to: Proposal to limit commissions of realtors and mortgage brokers #243383justme
ParticipantFunny stuff, equalizer.
I’d go with Version B. In Version C,you were kidding about the ratings agencies being worth anything, right ? 😉
July 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM in reply to: Proposal to limit commissions of realtors and mortgage brokers #243524justme
ParticipantFunny stuff, equalizer.
I’d go with Version B. In Version C,you were kidding about the ratings agencies being worth anything, right ? 😉
July 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM in reply to: Proposal to limit commissions of realtors and mortgage brokers #243531justme
ParticipantFunny stuff, equalizer.
I’d go with Version B. In Version C,you were kidding about the ratings agencies being worth anything, right ? 😉
July 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM in reply to: Proposal to limit commissions of realtors and mortgage brokers #243586justme
ParticipantFunny stuff, equalizer.
I’d go with Version B. In Version C,you were kidding about the ratings agencies being worth anything, right ? 😉
July 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM in reply to: Proposal to limit commissions of realtors and mortgage brokers #243594justme
ParticipantFunny stuff, equalizer.
I’d go with Version B. In Version C,you were kidding about the ratings agencies being worth anything, right ? 😉
July 18, 2008 at 1:21 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #241611justme
ParticipantOn another note: Someone higher up was advocating voting for 3d parties. I suppose most people understand that voting for a 3d party is a wasted vote, and in effect is a vote AGAINST the party that is closest to your ideals.
If you want a 3d party you have to work to change our election system. The reason we only have 2 parties in power is that we have single-person election districts and a winner-takes-all outcome. Duverger’s Law (see Wikipedia) all but ensures that single-person-districts will exclude anything more than 2 parties from power. So if you want change, work to change the election system to have large districts (20 representatives per district) and proportional representation. Then we will get somewhere. It is the only way, and I wholeheartedly support it. No more partisan gridlock and bipolar disorder!!
July 18, 2008 at 1:21 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #241749justme
ParticipantOn another note: Someone higher up was advocating voting for 3d parties. I suppose most people understand that voting for a 3d party is a wasted vote, and in effect is a vote AGAINST the party that is closest to your ideals.
If you want a 3d party you have to work to change our election system. The reason we only have 2 parties in power is that we have single-person election districts and a winner-takes-all outcome. Duverger’s Law (see Wikipedia) all but ensures that single-person-districts will exclude anything more than 2 parties from power. So if you want change, work to change the election system to have large districts (20 representatives per district) and proportional representation. Then we will get somewhere. It is the only way, and I wholeheartedly support it. No more partisan gridlock and bipolar disorder!!
July 18, 2008 at 1:21 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #241757justme
ParticipantOn another note: Someone higher up was advocating voting for 3d parties. I suppose most people understand that voting for a 3d party is a wasted vote, and in effect is a vote AGAINST the party that is closest to your ideals.
If you want a 3d party you have to work to change our election system. The reason we only have 2 parties in power is that we have single-person election districts and a winner-takes-all outcome. Duverger’s Law (see Wikipedia) all but ensures that single-person-districts will exclude anything more than 2 parties from power. So if you want change, work to change the election system to have large districts (20 representatives per district) and proportional representation. Then we will get somewhere. It is the only way, and I wholeheartedly support it. No more partisan gridlock and bipolar disorder!!
July 18, 2008 at 1:21 AM in reply to: McBama: The Long-Awaited Unveiling of The Official Establishment Tool #241811justme
ParticipantOn another note: Someone higher up was advocating voting for 3d parties. I suppose most people understand that voting for a 3d party is a wasted vote, and in effect is a vote AGAINST the party that is closest to your ideals.
If you want a 3d party you have to work to change our election system. The reason we only have 2 parties in power is that we have single-person election districts and a winner-takes-all outcome. Duverger’s Law (see Wikipedia) all but ensures that single-person-districts will exclude anything more than 2 parties from power. So if you want change, work to change the election system to have large districts (20 representatives per district) and proportional representation. Then we will get somewhere. It is the only way, and I wholeheartedly support it. No more partisan gridlock and bipolar disorder!!
-
AuthorPosts
