Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jstoeszParticipant
[quote=briansd1]
Once someone commits a violent crazy act, to preempt future violence, we should ruthlessly sweep through and elimate all that motivated it or could have influenced. I believe that Bush would agree to that.[/quote]
[quote=pri_dk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]But let’s say it does. Now what? Legislation to limit such speech?[/quote]
Allan,
NO ONE here is proposing any constraints on civil liberties (and I think you know that, so quit trying to steer the conversation toward Orwell.)
[/quote]I think we just found someone…or maybe two if you count bush.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=jstoesz]
As a society we need to look past what “caused” someone to do something. Bad people do bad things, because they are bad people. They could become good people, but they choose to be bad. We should not care if some serial rapist was molested as a child. Or why some wife beaters actions are not so bad because, after all, his dad beat him too. Move past the vitriol rhetoric and place the blame solely and absolutely on the bad person…Stop looking for other people to ensnare who have nothing to do with it.
[/quote]Do you think that Muslim terrorists are not motivated by their imams?
Are the imams who preach jihad at fault at all?[/quote]
And Besides Brian, it is not even the imam’s fault. The Imams have all been raised by a overbearing and physically abusive fathers, and they never learned to read. As we all know, education is the religion of pious Pax.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=jstoesz]
As a society we need to look past what “caused” someone to do something. Bad people do bad things, because they are bad people. They could become good people, but they choose to be bad. We should not care if some serial rapist was molested as a child. Or why some wife beaters actions are not so bad because, after all, his dad beat him too. Move past the vitriol rhetoric and place the blame solely and absolutely on the bad person…Stop looking for other people to ensnare who have nothing to do with it.
[/quote]Do you think that Muslim terrorists are not motivated by their imams?
Are the imams who preach jihad at fault at all?[/quote]
And Besides Brian, it is not even the imam’s fault. The Imams have all been raised by a overbearing and physically abusive fathers, and they never learned to read. As we all know, education is the religion of pious Pax.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=jstoesz]
As a society we need to look past what “caused” someone to do something. Bad people do bad things, because they are bad people. They could become good people, but they choose to be bad. We should not care if some serial rapist was molested as a child. Or why some wife beaters actions are not so bad because, after all, his dad beat him too. Move past the vitriol rhetoric and place the blame solely and absolutely on the bad person…Stop looking for other people to ensnare who have nothing to do with it.
[/quote]Do you think that Muslim terrorists are not motivated by their imams?
Are the imams who preach jihad at fault at all?[/quote]
And Besides Brian, it is not even the imam’s fault. The Imams have all been raised by a overbearing and physically abusive fathers, and they never learned to read. As we all know, education is the religion of pious Pax.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=jstoesz]
As a society we need to look past what “caused” someone to do something. Bad people do bad things, because they are bad people. They could become good people, but they choose to be bad. We should not care if some serial rapist was molested as a child. Or why some wife beaters actions are not so bad because, after all, his dad beat him too. Move past the vitriol rhetoric and place the blame solely and absolutely on the bad person…Stop looking for other people to ensnare who have nothing to do with it.
[/quote]Do you think that Muslim terrorists are not motivated by their imams?
Are the imams who preach jihad at fault at all?[/quote]
And Besides Brian, it is not even the imam’s fault. The Imams have all been raised by a overbearing and physically abusive fathers, and they never learned to read. As we all know, education is the religion of pious Pax.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=briansd1][quote=jstoesz]
As a society we need to look past what “caused” someone to do something. Bad people do bad things, because they are bad people. They could become good people, but they choose to be bad. We should not care if some serial rapist was molested as a child. Or why some wife beaters actions are not so bad because, after all, his dad beat him too. Move past the vitriol rhetoric and place the blame solely and absolutely on the bad person…Stop looking for other people to ensnare who have nothing to do with it.
[/quote]Do you think that Muslim terrorists are not motivated by their imams?
Are the imams who preach jihad at fault at all?[/quote]
And Besides Brian, it is not even the imam’s fault. The Imams have all been raised by a overbearing and physically abusive fathers, and they never learned to read. As we all know, education is the religion of pious Pax.
jstoeszParticipantI think you miss the point with the estate tax. The Tea Party’s ethic is anti-class warfare. It is getting back to a government that administers justice blindly, getting away from the crony capitalist model of both parties protecting their favored class/business. The estate tax to tea partiers feels like an unjust confiscatory policy, and their disagreement has nothing to do with who benefits from it. I think most people (tea partiers included) would say rich people are too rich…tea partiers and liberals diverge on what to do (or not do) about that…
jstoeszParticipantI think you miss the point with the estate tax. The Tea Party’s ethic is anti-class warfare. It is getting back to a government that administers justice blindly, getting away from the crony capitalist model of both parties protecting their favored class/business. The estate tax to tea partiers feels like an unjust confiscatory policy, and their disagreement has nothing to do with who benefits from it. I think most people (tea partiers included) would say rich people are too rich…tea partiers and liberals diverge on what to do (or not do) about that…
jstoeszParticipantI think you miss the point with the estate tax. The Tea Party’s ethic is anti-class warfare. It is getting back to a government that administers justice blindly, getting away from the crony capitalist model of both parties protecting their favored class/business. The estate tax to tea partiers feels like an unjust confiscatory policy, and their disagreement has nothing to do with who benefits from it. I think most people (tea partiers included) would say rich people are too rich…tea partiers and liberals diverge on what to do (or not do) about that…
jstoeszParticipantI think you miss the point with the estate tax. The Tea Party’s ethic is anti-class warfare. It is getting back to a government that administers justice blindly, getting away from the crony capitalist model of both parties protecting their favored class/business. The estate tax to tea partiers feels like an unjust confiscatory policy, and their disagreement has nothing to do with who benefits from it. I think most people (tea partiers included) would say rich people are too rich…tea partiers and liberals diverge on what to do (or not do) about that…
jstoeszParticipantI think you miss the point with the estate tax. The Tea Party’s ethic is anti-class warfare. It is getting back to a government that administers justice blindly, getting away from the crony capitalist model of both parties protecting their favored class/business. The estate tax to tea partiers feels like an unjust confiscatory policy, and their disagreement has nothing to do with who benefits from it. I think most people (tea partiers included) would say rich people are too rich…tea partiers and liberals diverge on what to do (or not do) about that…
jstoeszParticipantLet me get this straight…your are making a link between cult leaders (extremist imams) and conservative talk chuckle heads? Seriously?
jstoeszParticipantLet me get this straight…your are making a link between cult leaders (extremist imams) and conservative talk chuckle heads? Seriously?
jstoeszParticipantLet me get this straight…your are making a link between cult leaders (extremist imams) and conservative talk chuckle heads? Seriously?
-
AuthorPosts