Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226285June 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226394
jficquette
Participant[quote=Casca]America has not faced the prospect of such incredible folly since the election of one James Earl Carter. One hopes that there truly are the number of white racists in this country that the very racist Wright and Obama think there are. The joke on them is that they’ll be found in the blue collar ranks of their own party.[/quote]
Yes only Asians are as racist as Blacks.
Which makes me wonder if McCain can win California simply because the older Asians, the 50+ crowd will not vote for a Black.
Irony is Obama is as much white as black. His black side were never slaves since his father was from Africa plus his mother’s families ancestors use to be slave owners LOL.
Obama is a big lie.
June 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226413jficquette
Participant[quote=Casca]America has not faced the prospect of such incredible folly since the election of one James Earl Carter. One hopes that there truly are the number of white racists in this country that the very racist Wright and Obama think there are. The joke on them is that they’ll be found in the blue collar ranks of their own party.[/quote]
Yes only Asians are as racist as Blacks.
Which makes me wonder if McCain can win California simply because the older Asians, the 50+ crowd will not vote for a Black.
Irony is Obama is as much white as black. His black side were never slaves since his father was from Africa plus his mother’s families ancestors use to be slave owners LOL.
Obama is a big lie.
June 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226443jficquette
Participant[quote=Casca]America has not faced the prospect of such incredible folly since the election of one James Earl Carter. One hopes that there truly are the number of white racists in this country that the very racist Wright and Obama think there are. The joke on them is that they’ll be found in the blue collar ranks of their own party.[/quote]
Yes only Asians are as racist as Blacks.
Which makes me wonder if McCain can win California simply because the older Asians, the 50+ crowd will not vote for a Black.
Irony is Obama is as much white as black. His black side were never slaves since his father was from Africa plus his mother’s families ancestors use to be slave owners LOL.
Obama is a big lie.
June 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226457jficquette
Participant[quote=Casca]America has not faced the prospect of such incredible folly since the election of one James Earl Carter. One hopes that there truly are the number of white racists in this country that the very racist Wright and Obama think there are. The joke on them is that they’ll be found in the blue collar ranks of their own party.[/quote]
Yes only Asians are as racist as Blacks.
Which makes me wonder if McCain can win California simply because the older Asians, the 50+ crowd will not vote for a Black.
Irony is Obama is as much white as black. His black side were never slaves since his father was from Africa plus his mother’s families ancestors use to be slave owners LOL.
Obama is a big lie.
June 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226245jficquette
ParticipantJohn McCain: I Will Deliver Justice
Senator Obama is obviously confused about what the United States Supreme Court decided and what he is calling for. After enthusiastically embracing the Supreme Court decision granting habeas in U.S. civilian courts to dangerous terrorist detainees, he is now running away from the consequences of that decision and what it would mean if Osama bin Laden were captured. Senator Obama refuses to clarify whether he believes habeas should be granted to Osama bin Laden, and instead cites the precedent of the Nuremburg war trials. Unfortunately, it is clear Senator Obama does not understand what happened at the Nuremburg trials and what procedures were followed. There was no habeas at Nuremburg and there should be no habeas for Osama bin Laden. Senator Obama cannot have it both ways. In one breath he endorses habeas for terrorists like 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and in the next he denies its logical conclusion of habeas for Osama bin Laden. By citing a historical precedent that does not include habeas, he sends a signal of confusion and indecision to our allies and adversaries and the American people.
Let me be clear, under my administration Osama bin Laden will either be killed on the battlefield or executed. Senator Obama’s failure to comprehend the implication of the Supreme Court decision he embraced and the historical precedent of Nuremberg raise serious questions about judgment and experience and whether Senator Obama is ready to assume the awesome responsibilities of commander in chief.
Obama pwned again.
June 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226354jficquette
ParticipantJohn McCain: I Will Deliver Justice
Senator Obama is obviously confused about what the United States Supreme Court decided and what he is calling for. After enthusiastically embracing the Supreme Court decision granting habeas in U.S. civilian courts to dangerous terrorist detainees, he is now running away from the consequences of that decision and what it would mean if Osama bin Laden were captured. Senator Obama refuses to clarify whether he believes habeas should be granted to Osama bin Laden, and instead cites the precedent of the Nuremburg war trials. Unfortunately, it is clear Senator Obama does not understand what happened at the Nuremburg trials and what procedures were followed. There was no habeas at Nuremburg and there should be no habeas for Osama bin Laden. Senator Obama cannot have it both ways. In one breath he endorses habeas for terrorists like 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and in the next he denies its logical conclusion of habeas for Osama bin Laden. By citing a historical precedent that does not include habeas, he sends a signal of confusion and indecision to our allies and adversaries and the American people.
Let me be clear, under my administration Osama bin Laden will either be killed on the battlefield or executed. Senator Obama’s failure to comprehend the implication of the Supreme Court decision he embraced and the historical precedent of Nuremberg raise serious questions about judgment and experience and whether Senator Obama is ready to assume the awesome responsibilities of commander in chief.
Obama pwned again.
June 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226373jficquette
ParticipantJohn McCain: I Will Deliver Justice
Senator Obama is obviously confused about what the United States Supreme Court decided and what he is calling for. After enthusiastically embracing the Supreme Court decision granting habeas in U.S. civilian courts to dangerous terrorist detainees, he is now running away from the consequences of that decision and what it would mean if Osama bin Laden were captured. Senator Obama refuses to clarify whether he believes habeas should be granted to Osama bin Laden, and instead cites the precedent of the Nuremburg war trials. Unfortunately, it is clear Senator Obama does not understand what happened at the Nuremburg trials and what procedures were followed. There was no habeas at Nuremburg and there should be no habeas for Osama bin Laden. Senator Obama cannot have it both ways. In one breath he endorses habeas for terrorists like 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and in the next he denies its logical conclusion of habeas for Osama bin Laden. By citing a historical precedent that does not include habeas, he sends a signal of confusion and indecision to our allies and adversaries and the American people.
Let me be clear, under my administration Osama bin Laden will either be killed on the battlefield or executed. Senator Obama’s failure to comprehend the implication of the Supreme Court decision he embraced and the historical precedent of Nuremberg raise serious questions about judgment and experience and whether Senator Obama is ready to assume the awesome responsibilities of commander in chief.
Obama pwned again.
June 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226403jficquette
ParticipantJohn McCain: I Will Deliver Justice
Senator Obama is obviously confused about what the United States Supreme Court decided and what he is calling for. After enthusiastically embracing the Supreme Court decision granting habeas in U.S. civilian courts to dangerous terrorist detainees, he is now running away from the consequences of that decision and what it would mean if Osama bin Laden were captured. Senator Obama refuses to clarify whether he believes habeas should be granted to Osama bin Laden, and instead cites the precedent of the Nuremburg war trials. Unfortunately, it is clear Senator Obama does not understand what happened at the Nuremburg trials and what procedures were followed. There was no habeas at Nuremburg and there should be no habeas for Osama bin Laden. Senator Obama cannot have it both ways. In one breath he endorses habeas for terrorists like 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and in the next he denies its logical conclusion of habeas for Osama bin Laden. By citing a historical precedent that does not include habeas, he sends a signal of confusion and indecision to our allies and adversaries and the American people.
Let me be clear, under my administration Osama bin Laden will either be killed on the battlefield or executed. Senator Obama’s failure to comprehend the implication of the Supreme Court decision he embraced and the historical precedent of Nuremberg raise serious questions about judgment and experience and whether Senator Obama is ready to assume the awesome responsibilities of commander in chief.
Obama pwned again.
June 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #226415jficquette
ParticipantJohn McCain: I Will Deliver Justice
Senator Obama is obviously confused about what the United States Supreme Court decided and what he is calling for. After enthusiastically embracing the Supreme Court decision granting habeas in U.S. civilian courts to dangerous terrorist detainees, he is now running away from the consequences of that decision and what it would mean if Osama bin Laden were captured. Senator Obama refuses to clarify whether he believes habeas should be granted to Osama bin Laden, and instead cites the precedent of the Nuremburg war trials. Unfortunately, it is clear Senator Obama does not understand what happened at the Nuremburg trials and what procedures were followed. There was no habeas at Nuremburg and there should be no habeas for Osama bin Laden. Senator Obama cannot have it both ways. In one breath he endorses habeas for terrorists like 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and in the next he denies its logical conclusion of habeas for Osama bin Laden. By citing a historical precedent that does not include habeas, he sends a signal of confusion and indecision to our allies and adversaries and the American people.
Let me be clear, under my administration Osama bin Laden will either be killed on the battlefield or executed. Senator Obama’s failure to comprehend the implication of the Supreme Court decision he embraced and the historical precedent of Nuremberg raise serious questions about judgment and experience and whether Senator Obama is ready to assume the awesome responsibilities of commander in chief.
Obama pwned again.
jficquette
ParticipantPoor people can’t afford new electric cars. Besides, where do you think the energy to charge the car comes from?? The wall? LOL.
It has to be generated and that takes energy. As a matter of fact, more energy is wasted in distribution from the power plant to the end user to use in electric cars then would be used in transporting gasoline.
Electric cars are a joke. Also thank congress for not having the refineries we need.
Build as many refineries as we need. Start now. By the time they are finished the new found oil it will be ready to process.
John
jficquette
ParticipantPoor people can’t afford new electric cars. Besides, where do you think the energy to charge the car comes from?? The wall? LOL.
It has to be generated and that takes energy. As a matter of fact, more energy is wasted in distribution from the power plant to the end user to use in electric cars then would be used in transporting gasoline.
Electric cars are a joke. Also thank congress for not having the refineries we need.
Build as many refineries as we need. Start now. By the time they are finished the new found oil it will be ready to process.
John
jficquette
ParticipantPoor people can’t afford new electric cars. Besides, where do you think the energy to charge the car comes from?? The wall? LOL.
It has to be generated and that takes energy. As a matter of fact, more energy is wasted in distribution from the power plant to the end user to use in electric cars then would be used in transporting gasoline.
Electric cars are a joke. Also thank congress for not having the refineries we need.
Build as many refineries as we need. Start now. By the time they are finished the new found oil it will be ready to process.
John
jficquette
ParticipantPoor people can’t afford new electric cars. Besides, where do you think the energy to charge the car comes from?? The wall? LOL.
It has to be generated and that takes energy. As a matter of fact, more energy is wasted in distribution from the power plant to the end user to use in electric cars then would be used in transporting gasoline.
Electric cars are a joke. Also thank congress for not having the refineries we need.
Build as many refineries as we need. Start now. By the time they are finished the new found oil it will be ready to process.
John
jficquette
ParticipantPoor people can’t afford new electric cars. Besides, where do you think the energy to charge the car comes from?? The wall? LOL.
It has to be generated and that takes energy. As a matter of fact, more energy is wasted in distribution from the power plant to the end user to use in electric cars then would be used in transporting gasoline.
Electric cars are a joke. Also thank congress for not having the refineries we need.
Build as many refineries as we need. Start now. By the time they are finished the new found oil it will be ready to process.
John
-
AuthorPosts
