[jficquette]

[quote=afx114][quote=jficquette]I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.[/quote]

What administrative experience does McCain have?
[/quote]

He had adminstrative experience in the Navy. In fact he was offered the rank of Admiral if he would have stayed on rather then retire.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=afx114][quote=jficquette]I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.[/quote]

What administrative experience does McCain have?
[/quote]

He had adminstrative experience in the Navy. In fact he was offered the rank of Admiral if he would have stayed on rather then retire.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=afx114][quote=jficquette]I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.[/quote]

What administrative experience does McCain have?
[/quote]

He had adminstrative experience in the Navy. In fact he was offered the rank of Admiral if he would have stayed on rather then retire.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=afx114][quote=jficquette]I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.[/quote]

What administrative experience does McCain have?
[/quote]

He had adminstrative experience in the Navy. In fact he was offered the rank of Admiral if he would have stayed on rather then retire.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=afx114][quote=jficquette]I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.[/quote]

What administrative experience does McCain have?
[/quote]

He had adminstrative experience in the Navy. In fact he was offered the rank of Admiral if he would have stayed on rather then retire.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=renterclint][quote=jficquette]
I just hope naked pictures of her don’t show up on the internet.

John[/quote]

Mr Ficquette, you are too funny. Could it be possible that naked photos would gather more votes?

Can anyone really say how important executive or foreign policy experience is for a person to perform the duties of president?

I remember reading a passage in one of the Kennedy biographies about his first days in the whitehouse. It sounded like nothing short of chaos as this new young inexperienced group took over the executive branch, but didn’t Kennedy eventually get the hang of it? Now we hear a lot of comments about how inexperienced Lincoln was, and I think history shows he did a fair job.

Which experience is better?
1)several years on a small town council, small town mayor, then a few years governor of a state w/ a population smaller than most US cities.

or

2)several years in a state senate and a couple years as US Senator.

They seem about even to me. Oh yeah, each ticket also has an old dude w/decades of senate experience too.

I know, I know… the rookie has a different position on each party’s ticket, but the GOP has a 72 year old, cancer recovering guy on the top.[/quote]

Hi,

I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=renterclint][quote=jficquette]
I just hope naked pictures of her don’t show up on the internet.

John[/quote]

Mr Ficquette, you are too funny. Could it be possible that naked photos would gather more votes?

Can anyone really say how important executive or foreign policy experience is for a person to perform the duties of president?

I remember reading a passage in one of the Kennedy biographies about his first days in the whitehouse. It sounded like nothing short of chaos as this new young inexperienced group took over the executive branch, but didn’t Kennedy eventually get the hang of it? Now we hear a lot of comments about how inexperienced Lincoln was, and I think history shows he did a fair job.

Which experience is better?
1)several years on a small town council, small town mayor, then a few years governor of a state w/ a population smaller than most US cities.

or

2)several years in a state senate and a couple years as US Senator.

They seem about even to me. Oh yeah, each ticket also has an old dude w/decades of senate experience too.

I know, I know… the rookie has a different position on each party’s ticket, but the GOP has a 72 year old, cancer recovering guy on the top.[/quote]

Hi,

I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=renterclint][quote=jficquette]
I just hope naked pictures of her don’t show up on the internet.

John[/quote]

Mr Ficquette, you are too funny. Could it be possible that naked photos would gather more votes?

Can anyone really say how important executive or foreign policy experience is for a person to perform the duties of president?

I remember reading a passage in one of the Kennedy biographies about his first days in the whitehouse. It sounded like nothing short of chaos as this new young inexperienced group took over the executive branch, but didn’t Kennedy eventually get the hang of it? Now we hear a lot of comments about how inexperienced Lincoln was, and I think history shows he did a fair job.

Which experience is better?
1)several years on a small town council, small town mayor, then a few years governor of a state w/ a population smaller than most US cities.

or

2)several years in a state senate and a couple years as US Senator.

They seem about even to me. Oh yeah, each ticket also has an old dude w/decades of senate experience too.

I know, I know… the rookie has a different position on each party’s ticket, but the GOP has a 72 year old, cancer recovering guy on the top.[/quote]

Hi,

I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=renterclint][quote=jficquette]
I just hope naked pictures of her don’t show up on the internet.

John[/quote]

Mr Ficquette, you are too funny. Could it be possible that naked photos would gather more votes?

Can anyone really say how important executive or foreign policy experience is for a person to perform the duties of president?

I remember reading a passage in one of the Kennedy biographies about his first days in the whitehouse. It sounded like nothing short of chaos as this new young inexperienced group took over the executive branch, but didn’t Kennedy eventually get the hang of it? Now we hear a lot of comments about how inexperienced Lincoln was, and I think history shows he did a fair job.

Which experience is better?
1)several years on a small town council, small town mayor, then a few years governor of a state w/ a population smaller than most US cities.

or

2)several years in a state senate and a couple years as US Senator.

They seem about even to me. Oh yeah, each ticket also has an old dude w/decades of senate experience too.

I know, I know… the rookie has a different position on each party’s ticket, but the GOP has a 72 year old, cancer recovering guy on the top.[/quote]

Hi,

I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=renterclint][quote=jficquette]
I just hope naked pictures of her don’t show up on the internet.

John[/quote]

Mr Ficquette, you are too funny. Could it be possible that naked photos would gather more votes?

Can anyone really say how important executive or foreign policy experience is for a person to perform the duties of president?

I remember reading a passage in one of the Kennedy biographies about his first days in the whitehouse. It sounded like nothing short of chaos as this new young inexperienced group took over the executive branch, but didn’t Kennedy eventually get the hang of it? Now we hear a lot of comments about how inexperienced Lincoln was, and I think history shows he did a fair job.

Which experience is better?
1)several years on a small town council, small town mayor, then a few years governor of a state w/ a population smaller than most US cities.

or

2)several years in a state senate and a couple years as US Senator.

They seem about even to me. Oh yeah, each ticket also has an old dude w/decades of senate experience too.

I know, I know… the rookie has a different position on each party’s ticket, but the GOP has a 72 year old, cancer recovering guy on the top.[/quote]

Hi,

I rather have #1 for the administrative experience.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

Female hysteria was a once-common medical diagnosis, made exclusively in women, which is no longer recognized by modern medical authorities. It was a popular diagnosis in Western nations, during the Victorian era, for women who exhibited a wide array of symptoms including faintness, nervousness, insomnia, fluid retention, heaviness in abdomen, muscle spasm, shortness of breath, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and a “tendency to cause trouble”.[1]
Patients diagnosed with female hysteria would sometimes undergo “pelvic massage” — manual stimulation of the woman’s genitals by the doctor to “hysterical paroxysm”, which is now recognized as orgasm.[1][/quote]

Curing female hysteria seems like it would be a fun business to get into.

John

[Author]

Posts