[jficquette]

Wealth can not be built without credit expanding.

If you base the amount of money available on gold so that credit growth is based on Gold then you limit how fast you can expand credit since Gold would have to be acquired to support the debt.

All currencies are fiat now. Its doesn’t matter if it is fiat because its the governments that have been so reckless over the last 50 years spending it. Our spending is out of control due to the leaders we have elected not on the currency.

A country with a flat tax or a consumption tax and a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget would do great with fiat money.

John

[jficquette]

Wealth can not be built without credit expanding.

If you base the amount of money available on gold so that credit growth is based on Gold then you limit how fast you can expand credit since Gold would have to be acquired to support the debt.

All currencies are fiat now. Its doesn’t matter if it is fiat because its the governments that have been so reckless over the last 50 years spending it. Our spending is out of control due to the leaders we have elected not on the currency.

A country with a flat tax or a consumption tax and a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget would do great with fiat money.

John

[jficquette]

Wealth can not be built without credit expanding.

If you base the amount of money available on gold so that credit growth is based on Gold then you limit how fast you can expand credit since Gold would have to be acquired to support the debt.

All currencies are fiat now. Its doesn’t matter if it is fiat because its the governments that have been so reckless over the last 50 years spending it. Our spending is out of control due to the leaders we have elected not on the currency.

A country with a flat tax or a consumption tax and a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget would do great with fiat money.

John

[jficquette]

Wealth can not be built without credit expanding.

If you base the amount of money available on gold so that credit growth is based on Gold then you limit how fast you can expand credit since Gold would have to be acquired to support the debt.

All currencies are fiat now. Its doesn’t matter if it is fiat because its the governments that have been so reckless over the last 50 years spending it. Our spending is out of control due to the leaders we have elected not on the currency.

A country with a flat tax or a consumption tax and a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget would do great with fiat money.

John

[jficquette]

Wealth can not be built without credit expanding.

If you base the amount of money available on gold so that credit growth is based on Gold then you limit how fast you can expand credit since Gold would have to be acquired to support the debt.

All currencies are fiat now. Its doesn’t matter if it is fiat because its the governments that have been so reckless over the last 50 years spending it. Our spending is out of control due to the leaders we have elected not on the currency.

A country with a flat tax or a consumption tax and a constitutional amendment to require a balanced budget would do great with fiat money.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=lajolla-pig]I find it sad when someone as shockingly unqualified as Obama manages to skate into the nomination of a major US political party. The fact he did it before anyone even knew anything about him (other than his skin color) demonstrates conclusively that affirmative action and tokenism is a very dangerous thing.

Now we have a VP candidate under McCain who is only moderately more qualified than Obama. She was chosen primarily because she is as she.

This will be the first affirmative action election. Our leader will be chosen not based on merit, qualifications, capability, or talent…but on blind tokenism. The leftists must be very proud…they should be ashamed.[/quote]

There is no question that McCain is qualified for the Presidency.

Palin is much more qualifed the Obama. Palin has actually done something productive in her public life. We know nothing about Obama other then he can’t talk without a teleprompter.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=lajolla-pig]I find it sad when someone as shockingly unqualified as Obama manages to skate into the nomination of a major US political party. The fact he did it before anyone even knew anything about him (other than his skin color) demonstrates conclusively that affirmative action and tokenism is a very dangerous thing.

Now we have a VP candidate under McCain who is only moderately more qualified than Obama. She was chosen primarily because she is as she.

This will be the first affirmative action election. Our leader will be chosen not based on merit, qualifications, capability, or talent…but on blind tokenism. The leftists must be very proud…they should be ashamed.[/quote]

There is no question that McCain is qualified for the Presidency.

Palin is much more qualifed the Obama. Palin has actually done something productive in her public life. We know nothing about Obama other then he can’t talk without a teleprompter.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=lajolla-pig]I find it sad when someone as shockingly unqualified as Obama manages to skate into the nomination of a major US political party. The fact he did it before anyone even knew anything about him (other than his skin color) demonstrates conclusively that affirmative action and tokenism is a very dangerous thing.

Now we have a VP candidate under McCain who is only moderately more qualified than Obama. She was chosen primarily because she is as she.

This will be the first affirmative action election. Our leader will be chosen not based on merit, qualifications, capability, or talent…but on blind tokenism. The leftists must be very proud…they should be ashamed.[/quote]

There is no question that McCain is qualified for the Presidency.

Palin is much more qualifed the Obama. Palin has actually done something productive in her public life. We know nothing about Obama other then he can’t talk without a teleprompter.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=lajolla-pig]I find it sad when someone as shockingly unqualified as Obama manages to skate into the nomination of a major US political party. The fact he did it before anyone even knew anything about him (other than his skin color) demonstrates conclusively that affirmative action and tokenism is a very dangerous thing.

Now we have a VP candidate under McCain who is only moderately more qualified than Obama. She was chosen primarily because she is as she.

This will be the first affirmative action election. Our leader will be chosen not based on merit, qualifications, capability, or talent…but on blind tokenism. The leftists must be very proud…they should be ashamed.[/quote]

There is no question that McCain is qualified for the Presidency.

Palin is much more qualifed the Obama. Palin has actually done something productive in her public life. We know nothing about Obama other then he can’t talk without a teleprompter.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=lajolla-pig]I find it sad when someone as shockingly unqualified as Obama manages to skate into the nomination of a major US political party. The fact he did it before anyone even knew anything about him (other than his skin color) demonstrates conclusively that affirmative action and tokenism is a very dangerous thing.

Now we have a VP candidate under McCain who is only moderately more qualified than Obama. She was chosen primarily because she is as she.

This will be the first affirmative action election. Our leader will be chosen not based on merit, qualifications, capability, or talent…but on blind tokenism. The leftists must be very proud…they should be ashamed.[/quote]

There is no question that McCain is qualified for the Presidency.

Palin is much more qualifed the Obama. Palin has actually done something productive in her public life. We know nothing about Obama other then he can’t talk without a teleprompter.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=gandalf]Naw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…[/quote]

“Naw”?? You turned into a hick or something??

John

[jficquette]

[quote=gandalf]Naw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…[/quote]

“Naw”?? You turned into a hick or something??

John

[jficquette]

[quote=gandalf]Naw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…[/quote]

“Naw”?? You turned into a hick or something??

John

[jficquette]

[quote=gandalf]Naw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…[/quote]

“Naw”?? You turned into a hick or something??

John

[jficquette]

[quote=gandalf]Naw, it’s not from a publication. It’s coming from Fitch. From the models they use to rate the pools…[/quote]

“Naw”?? You turned into a hick or something??

John

[Author]

Posts