[jficquette]

Urban,

If you can’t balance your budget then eventually you will go bankrupt.

Since you don’t think a balanced budget matters then any reference to national debt is odd.

Democrats love to spend that money so they can hire more voters. Borrow from the unborn to stuff the ballot box. Gotta love the dems.

[jficquette]

Urban,

If you can’t balance your budget then eventually you will go bankrupt.

Since you don’t think a balanced budget matters then any reference to national debt is odd.

Democrats love to spend that money so they can hire more voters. Borrow from the unborn to stuff the ballot box. Gotta love the dems.

[jficquette]

Urban,

If you can’t balance your budget then eventually you will go bankrupt.

Since you don’t think a balanced budget matters then any reference to national debt is odd.

Democrats love to spend that money so they can hire more voters. Borrow from the unborn to stuff the ballot box. Gotta love the dems.

[jficquette]

Urban,

If you can’t balance your budget then eventually you will go bankrupt.

Since you don’t think a balanced budget matters then any reference to national debt is odd.

Democrats love to spend that money so they can hire more voters. Borrow from the unborn to stuff the ballot box. Gotta love the dems.

[jficquette]

Urban,

If you can’t balance your budget then eventually you will go bankrupt.

Since you don’t think a balanced budget matters then any reference to national debt is odd.

Democrats love to spend that money so they can hire more voters. Borrow from the unborn to stuff the ballot box. Gotta love the dems.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[Author]

Posts