[jficquette]

Arraya,

Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.

John

[jficquette]

Arraya,

Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:

Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.

It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]

I think if you were to go and find the complete article about it and read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge. Obama also did not comply with the order to produce documents to the court within the 30 days.

Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.

His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.

But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.

I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:

Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.

It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]

I think if you were to go and find the complete article about it and read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge. Obama also did not comply with the order to produce documents to the court within the 30 days.

Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.

His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.

But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.

I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:

Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.

It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]

I think if you were to go and find the complete article about it and read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge. Obama also did not comply with the order to produce documents to the court within the 30 days.

Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.

His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.

But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.

I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:

Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.

It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]

I think if you were to go and find the complete article about it and read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge. Obama also did not comply with the order to produce documents to the court within the 30 days.

Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.

His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.

But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.

I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:

Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.

It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]

I think if you were to go and find the complete article about it and read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge. Obama also did not comply with the order to produce documents to the court within the 30 days.

Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.

His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.

But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.

I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=peterb]Near a bottom? Tsunami’s coming. Maybe when CA unemployment is at 12% at the end of 2009 or in 2010.
Check all stats about CA home prices and unemployment above 7%. I think this may prove valuable to everyone who’s concerned about price movements in the housing market. The correlation is astoundingly high.

Check with SDCIA and see when Bruce Norris is going to be speaking again. Then take your wife to this meeting. Last a couple of hours.[/quote]

Plus rates are going to have to go up to restore the mortgage back securities markets.

[jficquette]

[quote=peterb]Near a bottom? Tsunami’s coming. Maybe when CA unemployment is at 12% at the end of 2009 or in 2010.
Check all stats about CA home prices and unemployment above 7%. I think this may prove valuable to everyone who’s concerned about price movements in the housing market. The correlation is astoundingly high.

Check with SDCIA and see when Bruce Norris is going to be speaking again. Then take your wife to this meeting. Last a couple of hours.[/quote]

Plus rates are going to have to go up to restore the mortgage back securities markets.

[jficquette]

[quote=peterb]Near a bottom? Tsunami’s coming. Maybe when CA unemployment is at 12% at the end of 2009 or in 2010.
Check all stats about CA home prices and unemployment above 7%. I think this may prove valuable to everyone who’s concerned about price movements in the housing market. The correlation is astoundingly high.

Check with SDCIA and see when Bruce Norris is going to be speaking again. Then take your wife to this meeting. Last a couple of hours.[/quote]

Plus rates are going to have to go up to restore the mortgage back securities markets.

[jficquette]

[quote=peterb]Near a bottom? Tsunami’s coming. Maybe when CA unemployment is at 12% at the end of 2009 or in 2010.
Check all stats about CA home prices and unemployment above 7%. I think this may prove valuable to everyone who’s concerned about price movements in the housing market. The correlation is astoundingly high.

Check with SDCIA and see when Bruce Norris is going to be speaking again. Then take your wife to this meeting. Last a couple of hours.[/quote]

Plus rates are going to have to go up to restore the mortgage back securities markets.

[jficquette]

[quote=peterb]Near a bottom? Tsunami’s coming. Maybe when CA unemployment is at 12% at the end of 2009 or in 2010.
Check all stats about CA home prices and unemployment above 7%. I think this may prove valuable to everyone who’s concerned about price movements in the housing market. The correlation is astoundingly high.

Check with SDCIA and see when Bruce Norris is going to be speaking again. Then take your wife to this meeting. Last a couple of hours.[/quote]

Plus rates are going to have to go up to restore the mortgage back securities markets.

[Author]

Posts