Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jficquette
ParticipantI may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.
Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.
They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.
In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.
John
ParticipantI may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.
Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.
They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.
In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.
John
ParticipantI may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.
Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.
They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.
In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.
John
ParticipantI may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.
Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.
They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.
In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.
John
ParticipantEsmith,
In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.
Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.
John
ParticipantEsmith,
In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.
Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.
John
ParticipantEsmith,
In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.
Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.
John
ParticipantEsmith,
In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.
Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.
John
ParticipantEsmith,
In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.
Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.
John
ParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
ParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
ParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
ParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
ParticipantSvelte
The exit polls show McCain leading in Florida 49-45 amongst early voters.
“A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.”
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20081029/BREAKINGNEWS/81029048/1006/news01“October 31, 2008 by PUMA Pundit
99% of Democrats support Obama right? Wrong. Take a look at this snippet coming out of Florida:Democrats are beaming that their party is outperforming the Republicans in early voting, releasing numbers Wednesday that show registrants of their party ahead 54 percent to 30 percent among the 1.4 million voters who have gone to the polls early.
but guess what the same article goes on to state?
A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll gave McCain a 49-45 lead over Democrat Barack Obama among Floridians who have already voted.
So Obama has a 6.4% advantage in turnout , yet is losing by 4%. Who could these democrats who are not voting for Obama possibly be?
Hmmm. Does the word “PUMA” ring a bell?e
If I say “PUMA” you say “Pounce”… PUMA… Pounce… PUMA… Pounce!”
John
-
AuthorPosts
