Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM in reply to: OT Anyone knows when the new budget’s license fee increase and sale tax increase will kick in??? #349989February 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM in reply to: OT Anyone knows when the new budget’s license fee increase and sale tax increase will kick in??? #350307
jennyo
ParticipantIn the Tuesday version of the tax bill, the VLF takes effect May 19, 2009 and the sales tax takes effect April 1, 2009.
That version of the bill also contained the fuel tax, which has been removed, but I don’t think there were any changes to effective dates for the VLF and sales tax.
February 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM in reply to: OT Anyone knows when the new budget’s license fee increase and sale tax increase will kick in??? #350434ParticipantIn the Tuesday version of the tax bill, the VLF takes effect May 19, 2009 and the sales tax takes effect April 1, 2009.
That version of the bill also contained the fuel tax, which has been removed, but I don’t think there were any changes to effective dates for the VLF and sales tax.
February 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM in reply to: OT Anyone knows when the new budget’s license fee increase and sale tax increase will kick in??? #350470ParticipantIn the Tuesday version of the tax bill, the VLF takes effect May 19, 2009 and the sales tax takes effect April 1, 2009.
That version of the bill also contained the fuel tax, which has been removed, but I don’t think there were any changes to effective dates for the VLF and sales tax.
February 19, 2009 at 4:10 PM in reply to: OT Anyone knows when the new budget’s license fee increase and sale tax increase will kick in??? #350569ParticipantIn the Tuesday version of the tax bill, the VLF takes effect May 19, 2009 and the sales tax takes effect April 1, 2009.
That version of the bill also contained the fuel tax, which has been removed, but I don’t think there were any changes to effective dates for the VLF and sales tax.
ParticipantHow about every suit brought by the Prison Law Office (PLO) representing CDCR inmates, which eventually resulted in the prison health care receivership? At least a couple billion over the past 5 years. Also, the Williams suit which required the state to pay for schools that haven’t done basic maintenance for years? Not trying to argue, but I have been doing this for quite awhile and the state does not win, especially when represented by the state’s attorneys.
Note that the “furlough” win did not address the question of constitutional officers, like the AG, who normally represents the state in legal challenges. When the Governor’s office hires outside counsel at $400/hour, it wins. But most of the time, the state “hires” the AG, as required by law, and doesn’t win.
ParticipantHow about every suit brought by the Prison Law Office (PLO) representing CDCR inmates, which eventually resulted in the prison health care receivership? At least a couple billion over the past 5 years. Also, the Williams suit which required the state to pay for schools that haven’t done basic maintenance for years? Not trying to argue, but I have been doing this for quite awhile and the state does not win, especially when represented by the state’s attorneys.
Note that the “furlough” win did not address the question of constitutional officers, like the AG, who normally represents the state in legal challenges. When the Governor’s office hires outside counsel at $400/hour, it wins. But most of the time, the state “hires” the AG, as required by law, and doesn’t win.
ParticipantHow about every suit brought by the Prison Law Office (PLO) representing CDCR inmates, which eventually resulted in the prison health care receivership? At least a couple billion over the past 5 years. Also, the Williams suit which required the state to pay for schools that haven’t done basic maintenance for years? Not trying to argue, but I have been doing this for quite awhile and the state does not win, especially when represented by the state’s attorneys.
Note that the “furlough” win did not address the question of constitutional officers, like the AG, who normally represents the state in legal challenges. When the Governor’s office hires outside counsel at $400/hour, it wins. But most of the time, the state “hires” the AG, as required by law, and doesn’t win.
ParticipantHow about every suit brought by the Prison Law Office (PLO) representing CDCR inmates, which eventually resulted in the prison health care receivership? At least a couple billion over the past 5 years. Also, the Williams suit which required the state to pay for schools that haven’t done basic maintenance for years? Not trying to argue, but I have been doing this for quite awhile and the state does not win, especially when represented by the state’s attorneys.
Note that the “furlough” win did not address the question of constitutional officers, like the AG, who normally represents the state in legal challenges. When the Governor’s office hires outside counsel at $400/hour, it wins. But most of the time, the state “hires” the AG, as required by law, and doesn’t win.
ParticipantHow about every suit brought by the Prison Law Office (PLO) representing CDCR inmates, which eventually resulted in the prison health care receivership? At least a couple billion over the past 5 years. Also, the Williams suit which required the state to pay for schools that haven’t done basic maintenance for years? Not trying to argue, but I have been doing this for quite awhile and the state does not win, especially when represented by the state’s attorneys.
Note that the “furlough” win did not address the question of constitutional officers, like the AG, who normally represents the state in legal challenges. When the Governor’s office hires outside counsel at $400/hour, it wins. But most of the time, the state “hires” the AG, as required by law, and doesn’t win.
ParticipantWhat the state is doing is questionably legal and will probably result in another huge lawsuit that we end up forking over hundreds of millions for. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it, but when is the last time you heard of the state of CA winning a lawsuit? It doesn’t happen.
ParticipantWhat the state is doing is questionably legal and will probably result in another huge lawsuit that we end up forking over hundreds of millions for. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it, but when is the last time you heard of the state of CA winning a lawsuit? It doesn’t happen.
ParticipantWhat the state is doing is questionably legal and will probably result in another huge lawsuit that we end up forking over hundreds of millions for. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it, but when is the last time you heard of the state of CA winning a lawsuit? It doesn’t happen.
ParticipantWhat the state is doing is questionably legal and will probably result in another huge lawsuit that we end up forking over hundreds of millions for. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it, but when is the last time you heard of the state of CA winning a lawsuit? It doesn’t happen.
ParticipantWhat the state is doing is questionably legal and will probably result in another huge lawsuit that we end up forking over hundreds of millions for. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it, but when is the last time you heard of the state of CA winning a lawsuit? It doesn’t happen.
-
AuthorPosts