[investor]

I guess not. It is a book by an economics Ph.D. whio predicted the current crisis back in 2005, published in 2006. He predicts two more bubbles to pop. A dollar bubble in probably 2013/2014 and then an american debt bubble after that. How does that effect housing in SD? He predicts that housing will fall 90% from peak with un-employment to 40-60%. Before davefromfallbrook/ SvfromCV and others jump all over me, this is not what I am saying but I do think that he may be more right than wrong. There are alot of authors saying similar things. you tube the subject to find others. Go ahead, fire away.

[investor]

I guess not. It is a book by an economics Ph.D. whio predicted the current crisis back in 2005, published in 2006. He predicts two more bubbles to pop. A dollar bubble in probably 2013/2014 and then an american debt bubble after that. How does that effect housing in SD? He predicts that housing will fall 90% from peak with un-employment to 40-60%. Before davefromfallbrook/ SvfromCV and others jump all over me, this is not what I am saying but I do think that he may be more right than wrong. There are alot of authors saying similar things. you tube the subject to find others. Go ahead, fire away.

[investor]

I guess not. It is a book by an economics Ph.D. whio predicted the current crisis back in 2005, published in 2006. He predicts two more bubbles to pop. A dollar bubble in probably 2013/2014 and then an american debt bubble after that. How does that effect housing in SD? He predicts that housing will fall 90% from peak with un-employment to 40-60%. Before davefromfallbrook/ SvfromCV and others jump all over me, this is not what I am saying but I do think that he may be more right than wrong. There are alot of authors saying similar things. you tube the subject to find others. Go ahead, fire away.

[investor]

I guess not. It is a book by an economics Ph.D. whio predicted the current crisis back in 2005, published in 2006. He predicts two more bubbles to pop. A dollar bubble in probably 2013/2014 and then an american debt bubble after that. How does that effect housing in SD? He predicts that housing will fall 90% from peak with un-employment to 40-60%. Before davefromfallbrook/ SvfromCV and others jump all over me, this is not what I am saying but I do think that he may be more right than wrong. There are alot of authors saying similar things. you tube the subject to find others. Go ahead, fire away.

[investor]

I guess not. It is a book by an economics Ph.D. whio predicted the current crisis back in 2005, published in 2006. He predicts two more bubbles to pop. A dollar bubble in probably 2013/2014 and then an american debt bubble after that. How does that effect housing in SD? He predicts that housing will fall 90% from peak with un-employment to 40-60%. Before davefromfallbrook/ SvfromCV and others jump all over me, this is not what I am saying but I do think that he may be more right than wrong. There are alot of authors saying similar things. you tube the subject to find others. Go ahead, fire away.

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor] What is interesting is that no one had any info better than what griffin had on pages 195 to 201 of his book.

[snip]

I repeat, not one post offered any new information on the money flow through the fed. I find that very illuminating.[/quote]

First of all, I doubt anyone here but yourself has bothered to read Griffin’s book (correct me if I’m wrong, “anyone”). Secondly, even if they had, I doubt anyone’s going to spend thousands of words rebutting SIX pages of points made by Griffin regarding the money flow through the Fed.

I could point to some obscure book on finance that spends six pages making some obscure point and then say, “See? No one is willing to refute the author’s point, therefore it must be correct!!”

Speaking for myself – I just don’t care enough what you think or why you think it to bother. And I doubt anyone else here does either. That should not be particularly illuminating.[/quote]
Davelj. Thank you for your reply. If you had read those 6 pages, you would find that they offer a detailed look at how the money flows into and out of the fed. Information that is hard to find and the fact that it is hard to find is what is illuminating about this subject, that no-one knows this information. Information about the entire money supply of the USA. You don’t know this information, don’t even care to read it, ridicule the source and then insult me by saying that no-one here cares what I think. I usually ignore ignorant statements like these but in your case, I will respond. Please do not respond to any further posts that I make as your input is not positive and tends to stop intelligent discourse on any subject. I hope that your posts are not a reflection of the rest of your life because if it is, you are probably one angry, un-happy individual. good luck.

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor] What is interesting is that no one had any info better than what griffin had on pages 195 to 201 of his book.

[snip]

I repeat, not one post offered any new information on the money flow through the fed. I find that very illuminating.[/quote]

First of all, I doubt anyone here but yourself has bothered to read Griffin’s book (correct me if I’m wrong, “anyone”). Secondly, even if they had, I doubt anyone’s going to spend thousands of words rebutting SIX pages of points made by Griffin regarding the money flow through the Fed.

I could point to some obscure book on finance that spends six pages making some obscure point and then say, “See? No one is willing to refute the author’s point, therefore it must be correct!!”

Speaking for myself – I just don’t care enough what you think or why you think it to bother. And I doubt anyone else here does either. That should not be particularly illuminating.[/quote]
Davelj. Thank you for your reply. If you had read those 6 pages, you would find that they offer a detailed look at how the money flows into and out of the fed. Information that is hard to find and the fact that it is hard to find is what is illuminating about this subject, that no-one knows this information. Information about the entire money supply of the USA. You don’t know this information, don’t even care to read it, ridicule the source and then insult me by saying that no-one here cares what I think. I usually ignore ignorant statements like these but in your case, I will respond. Please do not respond to any further posts that I make as your input is not positive and tends to stop intelligent discourse on any subject. I hope that your posts are not a reflection of the rest of your life because if it is, you are probably one angry, un-happy individual. good luck.

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor] What is interesting is that no one had any info better than what griffin had on pages 195 to 201 of his book.

[snip]

I repeat, not one post offered any new information on the money flow through the fed. I find that very illuminating.[/quote]

First of all, I doubt anyone here but yourself has bothered to read Griffin’s book (correct me if I’m wrong, “anyone”). Secondly, even if they had, I doubt anyone’s going to spend thousands of words rebutting SIX pages of points made by Griffin regarding the money flow through the Fed.

I could point to some obscure book on finance that spends six pages making some obscure point and then say, “See? No one is willing to refute the author’s point, therefore it must be correct!!”

Speaking for myself – I just don’t care enough what you think or why you think it to bother. And I doubt anyone else here does either. That should not be particularly illuminating.[/quote]
Davelj. Thank you for your reply. If you had read those 6 pages, you would find that they offer a detailed look at how the money flows into and out of the fed. Information that is hard to find and the fact that it is hard to find is what is illuminating about this subject, that no-one knows this information. Information about the entire money supply of the USA. You don’t know this information, don’t even care to read it, ridicule the source and then insult me by saying that no-one here cares what I think. I usually ignore ignorant statements like these but in your case, I will respond. Please do not respond to any further posts that I make as your input is not positive and tends to stop intelligent discourse on any subject. I hope that your posts are not a reflection of the rest of your life because if it is, you are probably one angry, un-happy individual. good luck.

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor] What is interesting is that no one had any info better than what griffin had on pages 195 to 201 of his book.

[snip]

I repeat, not one post offered any new information on the money flow through the fed. I find that very illuminating.[/quote]

First of all, I doubt anyone here but yourself has bothered to read Griffin’s book (correct me if I’m wrong, “anyone”). Secondly, even if they had, I doubt anyone’s going to spend thousands of words rebutting SIX pages of points made by Griffin regarding the money flow through the Fed.

I could point to some obscure book on finance that spends six pages making some obscure point and then say, “See? No one is willing to refute the author’s point, therefore it must be correct!!”

Speaking for myself – I just don’t care enough what you think or why you think it to bother. And I doubt anyone else here does either. That should not be particularly illuminating.[/quote]
Davelj. Thank you for your reply. If you had read those 6 pages, you would find that they offer a detailed look at how the money flows into and out of the fed. Information that is hard to find and the fact that it is hard to find is what is illuminating about this subject, that no-one knows this information. Information about the entire money supply of the USA. You don’t know this information, don’t even care to read it, ridicule the source and then insult me by saying that no-one here cares what I think. I usually ignore ignorant statements like these but in your case, I will respond. Please do not respond to any further posts that I make as your input is not positive and tends to stop intelligent discourse on any subject. I hope that your posts are not a reflection of the rest of your life because if it is, you are probably one angry, un-happy individual. good luck.

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor] What is interesting is that no one had any info better than what griffin had on pages 195 to 201 of his book.

[snip]

I repeat, not one post offered any new information on the money flow through the fed. I find that very illuminating.[/quote]

First of all, I doubt anyone here but yourself has bothered to read Griffin’s book (correct me if I’m wrong, “anyone”). Secondly, even if they had, I doubt anyone’s going to spend thousands of words rebutting SIX pages of points made by Griffin regarding the money flow through the Fed.

I could point to some obscure book on finance that spends six pages making some obscure point and then say, “See? No one is willing to refute the author’s point, therefore it must be correct!!”

Speaking for myself – I just don’t care enough what you think or why you think it to bother. And I doubt anyone else here does either. That should not be particularly illuminating.[/quote]
Davelj. Thank you for your reply. If you had read those 6 pages, you would find that they offer a detailed look at how the money flows into and out of the fed. Information that is hard to find and the fact that it is hard to find is what is illuminating about this subject, that no-one knows this information. Information about the entire money supply of the USA. You don’t know this information, don’t even care to read it, ridicule the source and then insult me by saying that no-one here cares what I think. I usually ignore ignorant statements like these but in your case, I will respond. Please do not respond to any further posts that I make as your input is not positive and tends to stop intelligent discourse on any subject. I hope that your posts are not a reflection of the rest of your life because if it is, you are probably one angry, un-happy individual. good luck.

[investor]

[quote=jpinpb]investor – I have not read the book (and I’ve got too much going on to read it – maybe someday when/if I retire).

As I said way back, I did watch Money Masters. I found it an interesting take on history and economics and government. True or not. I tend to think it’s true.

Someone told me the general public can’t be told the truth. There would be anarchy. So I always think of that famous movie line, “You can’t handle the truth.” And some truths are just too horrible to believe it’s true. Much easier to think people are “conspiracy theorists.”

In any case, I have don’t have any better info, nor do I have answers. I only have questions, one which I posed earlier. What can we do about it?[/quote]
Have the fed completly audited through pressure on congress, to include ownership of all stock.

[investor]

[quote=jpinpb]investor – I have not read the book (and I’ve got too much going on to read it – maybe someday when/if I retire).

As I said way back, I did watch Money Masters. I found it an interesting take on history and economics and government. True or not. I tend to think it’s true.

Someone told me the general public can’t be told the truth. There would be anarchy. So I always think of that famous movie line, “You can’t handle the truth.” And some truths are just too horrible to believe it’s true. Much easier to think people are “conspiracy theorists.”

In any case, I have don’t have any better info, nor do I have answers. I only have questions, one which I posed earlier. What can we do about it?[/quote]
Have the fed completly audited through pressure on congress, to include ownership of all stock.

[investor]

[quote=jpinpb]investor – I have not read the book (and I’ve got too much going on to read it – maybe someday when/if I retire).

As I said way back, I did watch Money Masters. I found it an interesting take on history and economics and government. True or not. I tend to think it’s true.

Someone told me the general public can’t be told the truth. There would be anarchy. So I always think of that famous movie line, “You can’t handle the truth.” And some truths are just too horrible to believe it’s true. Much easier to think people are “conspiracy theorists.”

In any case, I have don’t have any better info, nor do I have answers. I only have questions, one which I posed earlier. What can we do about it?[/quote]
Have the fed completly audited through pressure on congress, to include ownership of all stock.

[investor]

[quote=jpinpb]investor – I have not read the book (and I’ve got too much going on to read it – maybe someday when/if I retire).

As I said way back, I did watch Money Masters. I found it an interesting take on history and economics and government. True or not. I tend to think it’s true.

Someone told me the general public can’t be told the truth. There would be anarchy. So I always think of that famous movie line, “You can’t handle the truth.” And some truths are just too horrible to believe it’s true. Much easier to think people are “conspiracy theorists.”

In any case, I have don’t have any better info, nor do I have answers. I only have questions, one which I posed earlier. What can we do about it?[/quote]
Have the fed completly audited through pressure on congress, to include ownership of all stock.

[investor]

[quote=jpinpb]investor – I have not read the book (and I’ve got too much going on to read it – maybe someday when/if I retire).

As I said way back, I did watch Money Masters. I found it an interesting take on history and economics and government. True or not. I tend to think it’s true.

Someone told me the general public can’t be told the truth. There would be anarchy. So I always think of that famous movie line, “You can’t handle the truth.” And some truths are just too horrible to believe it’s true. Much easier to think people are “conspiracy theorists.”

In any case, I have don’t have any better info, nor do I have answers. I only have questions, one which I posed earlier. What can we do about it?[/quote]
Have the fed completly audited through pressure on congress, to include ownership of all stock.

[Author]

Posts